slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Available Model Runs 1) GMI aura2 combo chem, ASM winds, off line, 42 lev 2) CTM e701 (1 y) PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Available Model Runs 1) GMI aura2 combo chem, ASM winds, off line, 42 lev 2) CTM e701 (1 y)

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 11

Available Model Runs 1) GMI aura2 combo chem, ASM winds, off line, 42 lev 2) CTM e701 (1 y) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 60 Views
  • Uploaded on

Available Model Runs 1) GMI aura2 combo chem, ASM winds, off line, 42 lev 2) CTM e701 (1 y) GSFC chem, ASM winds, off line, 28 lev 3) CTM e619 (50-y run) GSFC chem, FVGCM winds, off line, 28 lev 4) CGCM ts2000 GSFC chem, interactive, on line, 55 lev 5) GMI FVGCM_9498

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Available Model Runs 1) GMI aura2 combo chem, ASM winds, off line, 42 lev 2) CTM e701 (1 y)' - mahon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
Available Model Runs

1) GMI aura2

combo chem, ASM winds, off line, 42 lev

2) CTM e701 (1 y)

GSFC chem, ASM winds, off line, 28 lev

3) CTM e619 (50-y run)

GSFC chem, FVGCM winds, off line, 28 lev

4) CGCM ts2000

GSFC chem, interactive, on line, 55 lev

5) GMI FVGCM_9498

combo chem, FVGCM winds, off line, 42 lev

All 2x2.5, within 1990-2006.

Compare to McPeters et al. climo, OMI.

slide2

Aura2

e701

Climo

Diff

asm simulation comparison
ASM Simulation Comparison
  • Meteorology (ASM vs GCM) dominates total O3 distribution, seasonal cycle.
  • Largest column O3 differences from climo are in SH mid latitudes with ASM winds and either chemistry.
  • ASM always too high at mid/high lats, but less so with combo-chem.
  • Tropics are close to observed.
slide5

e619

ts2000

Climo

diff

slide6

FVGCM Combo

Climo

diff

gcm simulation comparison
GCM Simulation Comparison
  • CGCM and 50-y GCM/CTM are generally similar to each other.
  • CGCM and 50-y CTM (GSFC chem) show significant O3 hole lag. Other simulations do not.
  • GCM simulations with GSFC chem show large excess column O3 at SH mid/high lats (similar to ASM). NH excess is not as large as ASM.
  • Tropics are close to observed.
slide10

Combo chem makes

less ozone globally.

Ozone hole appears a

little late.

NH lower strat is always

positive, but offset by

negative above in some

months.

chemistry comparison
Chemistry Comparison
  • Combo chem:
  • With GCM total O3 is too low almost everywhere.
  • Significantly low in SH high lats (except O3 hole) and between subtropics
  • Unusually good total O3 seasonal cycle at high lat NH
  • Why no delay in SH ozone hole break-up?