1 / 39

Grazing

Grazing. Grazing:. A form of exploitation where the prey (primary producer) is not killed. Typically involves low vegetation (grasses, herbs, algal mats), not taller, woody plants (“browsing”). Global distribution of grazed land:.

Download Presentation

Grazing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Grazing

  2. Grazing: • A form of exploitation where the prey (primary producer) is not killed. • Typically involves low vegetation (grasses, herbs, algal mats), not taller, woody plants (“browsing”).

  3. Global distribution of grazed land: Grazed grasslands are the largest single component (25%) of the Earth's 117 million km2 of vegetated lands. In the last 300 years, managed grazing systems have increased 6fold by land cover, and they are rising still.

  4. Grazing by biome

  5. 1.53 billion (2001) cattle occupy nearly 24 percent of earth’s landmass. Add sheep & goat: 3.3 billion (2001) They weight more than the entire human population. • Forest converted to pasture or production of cattle feed. • Desertification of marginal rangelands in semi-arid and arid regions. • Production of greenhouse gases (CO2, methane, nitrous oxide) 18% of emissions. • Decreased water quality through runoff from fertilized fields and feed lots. • Introduction of invasive species.

  6. In the 17 Western States: 1870: 4.1 million beef cattle 4.8 million sheep 1900: 19.6 million beef cattle 25.1 million sheep 1930: great drought

  7. Overgrazing – a global issue Since 1945, 3.8% of Earth’s vegetated land have been seriously degraded by overgrazing. The rate of abandonment of dryland due to degradation is 1 million km2 per decade and this rate is probably accelerating.

  8. 18 years without cattle 30 years without cattle Overgrazing fundamentally changed the face of western states

  9. San Pedro River, AZ in 1984 San Pedro River in 1998 Cattle-free for 12 years

  10. Grazing in the Texas Hill Country

  11. 1932 2000

  12. Woody Encroachment linked to Grazing: • Grazing reduces grass biomass, so that seedlings of woody plants achieve higher growth rates. • Fire is suppressed on rangelands, so that seedlings and saplings suffer lower mortality. • Grazers compact soils and increase erosion by wind and water, all of which lower grass productivity. • Grazers often facilitate seed dispersal.

  13. Overgrazing Increased spatial heterogeneity Shrubs replace grasses Soil compaction, loss of soil stability Wind & Water erosion Nutrient loss Irreversible land degradation.

  14. Mechanics of grazing: • Cow has a specific bite width given by the size of the mouth • Cow takes off a fixed percentage of the height of the pasture • Cow takes a certain amount of time tearing off a bitefull of grass • Cow takes time chewing proportional to bite size

  15. Co-evolution of grass and grazer Many large grazers evolved after a global climate change which replaced forests with grasslands at mid-latitudes Grazers evolved several specialized organs to deal with low quality, abrasive food: high-crowned teeth to increase the ability to tear apart abrasive grass leaves Ruminant digestive system

  16. Co-evolution of grass and grazer Grasses evolved strategies to escape from grazers: Below-ground storage of carbohydrate to rapidly regrow after grazing Altered morphology under heavy grazing: highly branched and low canopy

  17. Red Queen Hypothesis (the evolutionary arms race between consumer and consumed) "It takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place." The Red Queen said in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass.

  18. Intake per bite Grass height (“prey density”) But there is an ungrazeable horizon. Intake as a function of pasture height: Cattle take about 50% of the standing biomass within the bite area in one bite.

  19. Handling time Taking a bite takes the same amount of time, independent of bite size. Bite size Handling time as a function of bite size: Chewing time is proportional to biomass per bite.

  20. Functional response curve for grazing: Reflects limits of grazing time (ca. 13 hours per day) and digestive capacity (ca. 8 kg dry matter) Grazing limited by digestive capacity Daily rate of consumption per animal Grazing limited by time Grass height Non-grazeable horizon

  21. Predator density Predator isocline: Victim density Isoclines for free-breeding grazers this is the effect of the ungrazeable horizon

  22. Predator density Predator isocline: Victim density Free-breeding grazers

  23. Predator density Predator isocline: Victim density Free-breeding grazers: the grass “refuge” stabilizes

  24. Taurine cattle (without hump) were domesticated twice: In the near-east, giving rise to all European breeds (humpless cattle) In India (zebu, humped cattle) Zebu cattle probably entered Africa from India. Old-world grasses co-evolved with domesticated cattle for about 7000- 8000 years. New-world grasses did not. This may explain the vulnerability of American prairies to domestic cattle.

  25. Alien plant origins: Bromus spec Europe (near-east) Botriochloa Europe (near-east) Salsola spec Eurasia Timothy Europe Wild oat Europe Lehman lovegrass South Africa Buffelgrass (India and Africa) Bermudagrass (Africa)

  26. How about captive animals with fixed stock density? Total daily rate of grass consumption Increasing stocking rates Grass height

  27. Grass growth or consumption rate one cow per acre Grass height Stable grass height for grazing at 1 animal per acre. grass growth function

  28. Grass growth or consumption rate Grass height two cows per acre

  29. Grass growth or consumption rate Grass height four cows per acre

  30. unstable equilibrium state stable equilibrium state Grass growth or consumption rate Grass height five cows per acre

  31. five cows per acre Grass growth or consumption rate Grass height • One and the same stocking rate can lead to two stable states: • the desired state, where the sward is fast-growing and the cows eat all they can every day, • the “overgrazed” state, where the sward is growing slowly and • the cows remain hungry. 1 2

  32. Theoretically maximal yield: not stable! Grass growth or consumption rate Grass height Less productive years can easily set the system into the overgrazed state: drier year

  33. Grass growth or consumption rate Grass height Recovery from overgrazing is achieved only by drastically reducing stock density:

  34. Grass growth or consumption rate Grass height A safe stocking density is well below the maximal sustainable yield for average conditions:

  35. Summary so far: • In natural grazing systems, grasses and grazers have co-evolved to sustain one another. Example: the ungrazeable horizon prevents grasses from being eaten to extinction. • Grazers are controlled by the state of the grassland and vice versa. For example, grazer numbers decline when there is not enough forage, either by death or migration. Grazers disappear before they irreversibly damage the grassland. • In managed grazing systems, grazer numbers (stocking rates) are controlled by the rancher, making it possible for grass and soil system to be damaged beyond repair. • Things that are harmful: • Supplementary feeding during drought. This maintains an unrealistically large herd. • Restocking too soon after drought. This subtracts time for grasses to repair and recover.

  36. Summary so far: • Theory suggests that harvesting a resource at the maximal rate maximizes the risk of over-exploitation. • The pre-cautionary principle therefore suggest to set stocking rate far below the value that would maximize production in an average year. • However, economic forces tend to work in the opposite direction.

  37. The Tragedy of the Commons Multiple individuals, acting independently and rationally in their own self-interest, will ultimately deplete a shared limited resource, even when it is not in anyone's long-term interest for this to happen. – Hardin 1968.

  38. The tragedy is the result of privatizing profits, while sharing the costs.

  39. Summary: • Co-evolution of grass and grazer produces stable grazing systems. • Lack of co-evolution often causes species extinctions and reorganization of biodiversity. • Overstocking causes irreversible loss of species diversity, soil quality and quantity. Unfortunately, there are economic incentives for overstocking. • This is what happened when cattle, sheep, goat were introduced to the Americas, Australia and the Pacific Islands. • Cattle production is still on the rise globally, at the cost of forest conversion to species-poor grasslands, the spread of exotic, invasive species (which often did co-evolve with cattle), methane production (a greenhouse gas), irreversible land degradation.

More Related