1 / 20

BLOSSOM Switzerland case study Owen White, Collingwood Environmental Planning Ltd.

BLOSSOM Switzerland case study Owen White, Collingwood Environmental Planning Ltd. Bern-Ittigen 9. September 2013. Abteilung Ökonomie und Umweltbeobachtung. BLOSSOM – what is it?.

mae
Download Presentation

BLOSSOM Switzerland case study Owen White, Collingwood Environmental Planning Ltd.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BLOSSOM Switzerland case studyOwen White, Collingwood Environmental Planning Ltd. Bern-Ittigen 9. September 2013 Abteilung Ökonomie und Umweltbeobachtung

  2. BLOSSOM – what is it? Research based analysis of the success factors andbarriers to a long-term perspective in public policymaking [with particular reference to environmental planning] BLOSSOM is the first systematic comparison at the European level of how futures studies are used to inform environmental policymaking

  3. Project: Execution of a BLOSSOM case-study for Switzerland • The objective of this project is for CEP to complete a BLOSSOM case study for Switzerland in accordance with the requirements and templates of the EEA • The case study is intended to help strengthen the institutionalisation of long-term thinking in environmental planning in Switzerland → The project is being completed by external consultants to help ensure an independent view and recommendations

  4. A BLOSSOM case-study for Switzerland

  5. PART I: OVERVIEW OF FINDINGS

  6. Responsibilities – legal and political mandate • No specific formal or legal requirement for long-term analysis / foresight • However clear political mandate in relation to: • Sustainable Development Strategy : Federal Resolution, 2008 • Outlook 2025 : Parliament Act (SR 171.10 Art 146) • DETEC strategy : sets frame for it’s Federal Offices • Legal obligation in some areas e.g. climate change, Basic Supplies Unit (FONES)

  7. Responsibilities – main actors and studies Sustainable Development Strategy Federal Council DETEC / UVEK ARE Coordinate Manage Link : Outlook 2025 ISDC SDS Leadership body Federal Cantons Cities ~30 federal agencies

  8. Responsibilities – main actors and studies Outlook 2025 Federal Council Representatives of 7 Federal Departments Federal Chancellery Hosted by Strategic Planning Unit Forward Planning Staff Link : SDS Outlook 2025 Legislature planning

  9. Responsibilities – main actors and studies • DETEC departmental strategy • Vision to 2030 / frame for its’ Federal Offices • FDF – perspectives in public finance • Federal Chancellery / BFS – scenarios for industrial sectors • BFS – population and demographics • FOAG – agriculture and food industry • FOEN – various environmental outlooks • SFOE – energy perspective 2035 and energy strategy 2050 • FONES – security of supply • See Table 1 in report for list identified in study

  10. Relationships – between departments / offices • Generally: • Ad-hoc, voluntary, informal – quite common but in context of specific studies or initiatives • No formalised, statutory internal advisory councils / bodies… • Apart from: • The ISDC brings ~30 agencies together • ISDC leadership body includes: ARE, FOPH, FOAG, FOEN, SDC • And: • Outlook 2025 the Forward Planning Staff made up of representatives of all 7 Federal Departments

  11. Relationships – external SDS 2012 - 2015 • Development: • Interviews as part of evaluation of previous SDS • Implementation: • Communication activities • Sustainable Development Forum (cantons and cities) – 2 plenary / year • Sustainable Development Dialogue (civil society and private sector) – 1 plenary / year

  12. Relationships – external Outlook 2025 • Participative methodology: • 5 phases, of which external experts and wider stakeholder included in 3 (validation of trends, scenario development, challenges and scope for action) • Method proposed likely to change in next Outlook study, with external stakeholders involved more in first phase: preparing the groundwork

  13. Relationships – external Other examples • External steering groups (Begleitgruppen) with representatives from civil society and others (energy perspectives) • Use of external experts – as consultants – although this is not really ‘consultation’ / participation • Overall: • No dedicated programme or office/s for external-looking stakeholder deliberation • Lack of formalisation or regular pattern of involvement

  14. Relationships - other findings and reflections • Subsidiarity as a tendency – departments and offices consider issues in their own context • Stronger coordination of the SDS and legislature planning process (Federal Council Resolution 2009) – possible frame for more coordinated activities • Interviewees felt there are a number of challenges: • Multiplicity • Different and inconsistent time-horizons

  15. Impact on policy making • Foresight and outlook projects and studies generally: • Strategic in nature • Intended to inform debate on options • Federal studies can have a ‘legitimising’ effect • Most are ‘exploratory’ rather than ‘normative’ • Sector specific studies can be more normative: • E.g. energy studies following Fukushima

  16. Discussion points... • Do you agree with the findings? • Are there any strong misinterpretations? • Any major gaps? • Any other comments or observations?

  17. PART II: REFLECTIONS AND NEXT STEPS

  18. Success factors and barriers

  19. Possible future options and next steps • Catalogue and formally document all future studies • Develop (and maintain) accessible database of studies • Establish a formal inter-departmental committee for the presentation and exchange of information • Formal, legal mandate for one government office to act as coordinator for futures activity • Build knowledge / capacity of bureaucrats / politicians • Stronger links between Federal Administration and Swiss academic institutions • Collaboration between FOEN and Federal Chancellery in context of environmental outlooks

  20. Discussion points... • Is change needed? • Reflections on the possible options • Are these realistic? • Are there other options to consider? • What are the practical next steps?

More Related