1 / 23

Hüseyin DEMİRBİLEK BRAF Permanent Secretariat Expert RTUK International Relations Expert

Hüseyin DEMİRBİLEK BRAF Permanent Secretariat Expert RTUK International Relations Expert Kyiv, Ukraine 06 September 2013. BRAF - Comparative Analysis of BRAF Member States ’ Regulatory Authorities based on TRAI Forms.

lynsey
Download Presentation

Hüseyin DEMİRBİLEK BRAF Permanent Secretariat Expert RTUK International Relations Expert

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hüseyin DEMİRBİLEK BRAF Permanent Secretariat Expert RTUK International Relations Expert Kyiv, Ukraine 06 September 2013 BRAF - Comparative Analysis of BRAF Member States’ Regulatory Authorities based on TRAI Forms

  2. Comparative Analysis of BRAF Member States’ Regulatory Authorities based on TRAI Forms The goals of the comparative analysis are : • toscrutinize the broadcasting landscape of theBRAF Member States. • to comparethestate of affairs of the BRAF MemberStates’ broadcasting regulation authorities 2

  3. Comparative Analysis of BRAF Member States Regulatory Authorities based on TRAI Forms Inordertoachievethesegoals: • Tirana Form of Regulatory Authorities’ Identity (TRAI Form)whichwasadopted in the 3rd Annual Meeting of BRAF in Albania in 2012 has beenutilized. • Atotal number of 10 countries; Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, Serbia, Turkey, Ukraine filled in the TRAI form out of 12 BRAF Member States. Russia and Greece have not provided any data. • TRAI Form contains 33 itemswhich can be categorized in threeareas. 3

  4. Comparative Analysis of BRAF Member States Regulatory Authorities based on TRAI Forms 4

  5. Comparative Analysis of BRAF Member States Regulatory Authorities based on TRAI Forms The categories of the TRAI Form are as follows: 1) The audiovisual landscape of the BRAF Member States • population, • gdp/per capita, • digitalization status, • total number of TV broadcasters; • satellite, • national, • local, • cable, IPTV broadcasters, • number of public service broadcasters) 5

  6. Comparative Analysis of BRAF Member States Regulatory Authorities based on TRAI Forms 2) The identity of the national regulatory authorities/councils; regulatory authority, • date of establishment, • broadcasting law and date of ratified, • election of members, • convergence status, • the scope of authority, • market analysis, • incomes) 6

  7. Comparative Analysis of BRAF Member States Regulatory Authorities based on TRAI Forms 3) Regulatory power of the national regulatory authorities/councils • regulations on obscenity and pornography; • protection of minors, • media ownership, • media literacy, • product placement, • commercial communication regulations, • basic sanctions,number of violation report, number of sanction report • broadcasting during election period, 7

  8. The audiovisual landscape of the BRAF Member States 8

  9. The audiovisual landscape of the BRAF Member States 9

  10. The audiovisual landscape of the BRAF Member States 10

  11. The identity of the national regulatory authorities/councils 11

  12. The identity of the national regulatory authorities/councils 12

  13. The identity of the national regulatory authorities/councils 13

  14. The identity of the national regulatory authorities/councils 14

  15. Regulatory power of the national regulatory authorities/councils 15

  16. Regulatory power of the national regulatory authorities/councils 16

  17. Regulatory power of the national regulatory authorities/councils 17

  18. Regulatory power of the national regulatory authorities/councils 18

  19. Regulatory power of the national regulatory authorities/councils 19

  20. Regulatory power of the national regulatory authorities/councils 20

  21. Regulatory power of the national regulatory authorities/councils 21

  22. Regulatory power of the national regulatory authorities/councils 22

  23. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Hüseyin DEMİRBİLEK BRAF Permanent Secretariat Expert RTUK International Relations Expert Kyiv, Ukraine 6 September 2013 BRAF - Comparative Analysis of BRAF Member States’ Regulatory Authorities based on TRAI Forms 23

More Related