PDS4 Impact on Roses

1. PDS4 Impact on Roses • From response from PDS Nodes Number of Data Sets Ingested That Could Have Been Impacted Node 2011 2012 Small Bodies (Dust)*US Providers 10 10 Small Bodies (Dust)*International Providers 5 3 Small Bodies (comets) 3 Planetary Rings 1 3 PPI Imaging 6 6 Geosciences 3 1 Atmospheres 4 3 * Of these, most but not all submitted their data by OLAF, and thus don't have to learn to produce PDS3 (or in the future, PDS4). PDS MC Meeting, Columbia MD, Apr 2-3, 2013

2. Harvesting Roses This represents a good estimate of the level of interaction between PDS and R&A funded data providers. The number of providers could become higher 1. If the agency supporting peer reviews provides NASA personnel dealing with grant selection a summary sheet that contains a column indicating whether there is a proposed dataset associated with each proposal in their summary sheets? 2. If there were a systematic way of collecting the funded proposals planning to provide data set and developing a spread sheet that contains the proposal abstract and contact person. 3. If the PDS had this information, the appropriate node could contact the Grantee and, at an early date, provide support to allow efficient production of the data sets. Currently, individuals can propose data sets if they feel it enhances the chance of getting funded. There is no consistent follow-up. And communication usually occurs when the grantee needs to put in another proposal. PDS MC Meeting, Columbia MD, Apr 2-3, 2013

3. PDS4 Impact on Roses • From response from PDS Nodes Small Bodies / Dust -This is for the PSI branch of SBN, asteroids and dust.  (A number of these individuals or teams submitted multiple data sets.) Non-mission US individuals or teams submitting data -- 2011: 10 -- 2012: 10 Non-mission non-US individuals or teams submitting data --2011:  5 --in 2012:  3 Of these, most but not all submitted their data by OLAF, and thus don't have to learn to produce PDS3 (or in the future, PDS4). Small Bodies/Comets - we have received cometary data from 3 different data providers other than missions.  Two of those were done cooperatively with SBN staff to minimize the PDS learning and to ensure things came in the way we wanted them Rings - In 2011, Rings received one data set, 110 data products, funded by CDAP. In 2012 we received 3 data sets, a total of 475,784 products, funded by PMDAP.- PDS MC Meeting, Columbia MD, Apr 2-3, 2013

4. PDS4 Impact on Roses • From response from PDS Nodes Imaging --For R&A activities, Imaging is ingesting products from several LASER and/or DAP projects: --JSC/Apollo Rocks-Lofgren --ARC/Apollo Pan mosaics-Beyer --ASU/Apollo image scans-Robinson --ColumbiaUniv/Lunar Orbiter improved frame mosaics-Byrnes --LOIRP/LO magtape products-Wingo (no products yet, just guidance) For these projects combined, the product count is just under 60000 products in the past two years.  We also support DAP proposals from 4 to 8 people a year, but most are not funded (with the above exceptions, thus far). Geosciences PDS MC Meeting, Columbia MD, Apr 2-3, 2013

5. PDS4 Impact on Roses • From response from PDS Nodes Geosciences Atmospheres 2011 Karen Simmons submitted 3 data sets from data recovery funding (Mariner 6,7 &9) and Glen Orton submitted a partial IRTF data set that he has not completed. In 2012 Dave Hinson submitted 2 data sets of Martian atmospheric profiles and Glen Orton submitted another incomplete IRTF data set that requires action on his part. PDS MC Meeting, Columbia MD, Apr 2-3, 2013