1 / 23

Personality and Psychotherapy Outcome

Personality and Psychotherapy Outcome. Does Psychotherapy Work?. efficacy study contrasts some kind of therapy to a comparison group under well controlled conditions high internal validity (degree of confidence that IV caused change in DV) effectiveness study

lyndon
Download Presentation

Personality and Psychotherapy Outcome

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personality and Psychotherapy Outcome

  2. Does Psychotherapy Work? • efficacy study • contrasts some kind of therapy to a comparison group under well controlled conditions • high internal validity (degree of confidence that IV caused change in DV) • effectiveness study • how patients fare under the actual conditions of treatment in the field • high external validity (ability to generalize)

  3. Model Efficacy Study • patients are randomly assigned to treatment • existence of a control group • non treatment-seekers • wait list • placebo pill • clinical case management: controls for expectation of benefit, rapport, and sympathetic attention • treatments are manualized • highly scripted, fidelity is assessed using videotapes

  4. Model Efficacy Study (continued) • patients are seen for a fixed number of sessions • target outcomes (dependent variables) are well operationalized • self report • therapist report • independent evaluator report • significant other/peer report • multiple indicators are best

  5. Model Efficacy Study (continued) • raters and diagnosticians are blind to which group patient comes from • patients meet criteria for only one disorder • long-term follow-up • patients are followed for some fixed period of time after treatment ends

  6. Some Efficacy Study Findings: • depression • cognitive therapy, interpersonal therapy, and medications all provide moderate relief • psychotherapy more effective than meds at preventing relapse • obsessive-compulsive disorder • exposure with response prevention and medications both relieve symptoms • exposure with response prevention more effective than meds at preventing relapse

  7. Some Efficacy Study Findings: • panic disorder • cognitive therapy plus exposure to cues that trigger panic work well • psychotherapy more effective at preventing relapse than meds • phobia • exposure to feared stimulus plus response prevention works well • sexual offenses • aversion therapy produces only marginal improvements

  8. Some Efficacy Study Findings: • bulimia • cognitive therapy provides significant relief and outperforms medications

  9. Meta-analysis • Combines results across multiple studies • Strengths • Can detect average effect size • Can examine some variables systematically (e.g., duration of treatment, experience of therapist) • Potential problems • Apples and oranges • Garbage in; garbage out

  10. Smith, Glass, & Miller (1980) • Patients in treatment groups improved more than controls • Variables that didn’t affect outcome • duration of therapy • training/experience of therapist • type of therapy (dodo bird problem)

  11. Some Qualifications • Failure of some well-designed studies to show effects • NIMH collaborative study on tx of depression • CBT, IPT, drug, clinical management (placebo drug & support) • At end of tx, 3 active txs only marginally better than clinical management • At 6-mos f/u, no diffs

  12. Effectiveness Studies • investigates how patients fare under the actual conditions of treatment in the field • psychotherapy in the field • is often “eclectic” • is not of fixed duration • is self-correcting • patients get there by active shopping • patients have multiple problems

  13. An Example • Consumer Reports included survey about psychotherapy and drugs in its 1994 annual questionnaire • 22,000 responded to survey • 7,000 had experienced stress or emotional problem for which they had sought help in past 3 years • 4,100 saw mental health professional, family doctor, or support group

  14. Major Findings • Most people reported getting better • among 426 people who were feeling “very poor” when they began therapy, 87% were feeling very good, good, or at least so-so. • among 786 people who were feeing “fairly poor” at beginning of therapy, 92% were feeling very good, good, or at least so-so.

  15. Major Findings (continued) • the longer people were in therapy, the more improvement they reported • there was no difference between psychotherapy alone and psychotherapy plus medication for any disorder • psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers • did equally well • did better than marriage counselors and family doctors

  16. Major Findings (continued) • active shoppers did better than passive recipients • no specific type of psychotherapy did better than any other • respondents whose choice of therapist or duration of care was limited by their insurance coverage did worse

  17. A Few Caveats • Consumer Reports study found that • only 1/2 of the respondents thought that therapy “made things a lot better” regarding their presenting problem • only 1/3 of the respondents thought that therapy “made things a lot better” regarding overall functioning • Many other studies find that, even with treatment, the relapse rate for many disorders is high

  18. Seligman’s (1993) theory • What You Can Change and What You Can’t • responsiveness of a problem to therapy depends on the depth of the problem • biological: • to the extent that a psychological condition has biological underpinnings because it is evolutionarily prepared or heritable, it will be harder to change

  19. Seligman’s (1993) theory • evidence: • the easier a belief underlying a problem is to confirm, and the harder it is to disconfirm, the harder it will be to change • power • a theory has high power when it is general and explains many facts about the world • to the extent that a belief underlying a problem has high power, the harder it will be to change

  20. Some Examples • specific phobia • somewhat prepared: have been evolutionarily prepared to learn to fear some things more easily than others • easy to disconfirm: if you expose yourself to spiders • low power: belief that spiders are dangerous applies only to spiders

  21. sexual orientation • highly prepared: probably influenced by biological factors such as hormonal levels during gestation • hard to disconfirm: you enjoy sexual activity with one gender, but not the other • powerful: sexual orientation affects many spheres of life (political beliefs, religious beliefs, social circles)

  22. Problems ranked from easiest to most difficult to change • panic: curable • specific phobia: almost curable • sexual dysfunction: marked relief • social phobia: moderate relief • agoraphobia: moderate relief • depression: moderate relief • obsessive-compulsive disorder: moderate/mild relief

  23. Problems ranked from easiest to most difficult to change • paraphilia: moderate/mild relief • anger: mild/moderate relief • everyday anxiety: mild/moderate relief • alcoholism: mild relief • overweight: temporary change • posttraumatic stress disorder: marginal relief • sexual orientation: probably unchangeable

More Related