1 / 24

JAMES S. Bethel Wonjo Jung Geomatics Engineering School of Civil Engineering Purdue University

Sensor Modeling and Triangulation for an Airborne Three Line Scanner < 2008 ASPRS Annual Conference >. JAMES S. Bethel Wonjo Jung Geomatics Engineering School of Civil Engineering Purdue University APR-30-2008. Outline. Introduction Dataset Camera Design

lyn
Download Presentation

JAMES S. Bethel Wonjo Jung Geomatics Engineering School of Civil Engineering Purdue University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sensor Modeling and Triangulation for an Airborne Three Line Scanner < 2008 ASPRS Annual Conference > JAMES S. Bethel Wonjo Jung Geomatics Engineering School of Civil Engineering Purdue University APR-30-2008

  2. Outline • Introduction • Dataset • Camera Design • Flight and observations (3-OC Atlanta, GA) • Sensor Model • Trajectory Model • Pseudo Observation Equations • Data Ajustment • Implementation • Results • Conclusions • Future plans

  3. 1. Introduction MAIN OBJECTIVE Developing an algorithm to recover orientation parameters for an airborne three line scanner

  4. 1. Introduction - Types of three line scanners Three separate cameras Linear arrays on the same focal plane Lens

  5. 1. Introduction Instantaneous gimbal rotation center • While ADS40, TLS and JAS placed CCD arrays on the focal plane in a single optical system, 3-DAS-1 and 3-OC use three optical systems, rigidly fixed to each other. • For this reason, we need to develop a photogrammetirc model for three different cameras moving together along a single flight trajectory flight trajectory

  6. 1. Introduction • Parameters to be estimated • Exterior orientation parameters • 6 parameters per an image line • Additional external parameters • Translation vector between a gimbal center to perspective centers • Rotation angles between gimbal axis and sensor coordinate systems • Interior orientation parameters • Focal lengths • Principal points • Radial distortions

  7. 1. Introduction • There have been two kinds of approaches. • Reducing number of unknown parameters • Piece-wise polynomials • Providing fictitious observations in addition to the real observations • Stochastic models

  8. 1. Introduction • Reducing number of unknown parameters • Piecewise polynomials 3×6=18 estimated 1000×6=6000 given

  9. 1. Introduction • Providing fictitious observations in addition to the real observations • 1st-Order Gauss-Markov Model observations estimated given

  10. 1. Introduction • Self-calibration • Partial camera calibration information is provided. • focal length, aperture ratio, shift of the distortion center, radial distortion • Coordinates of projection center of the camera relative to the gimbal center is not measured. Just design values are provided. • Need to refine some of the parameters

  11. 2. DATASET • Camera Design (3-OC)

  12. 2. DATASET : 20 GCPs : 8Check points

  13. 3. Sensor Model • Collinearity Equation – a line scanner Sensor Coordinate System (SCS) Perspective Center scan line flight direction SCS column row Ground

  14. 3. Sensor Model • Collinearity Equation - oblique camera perspective Center scan line flight direction Ground

  15. 3. Sensor Model • Collinearity in a three line scanner three angles should be considered flight direction gimbal center B N F plumb line

  16. 4. Trajectory Model • 1st order Gauss-Markov trajectory model • Probability density function f(x(t)) at a certain time is dependent only upon previous point • Probability density function is assumed to be Gaussian • Autocorrelation function becomes

  17. 4. Trajectory Model • 1st order Gauss-Markov trajectory model autocorrelation function Parameters are highly correlated!

  18. 5. Pseudo Observation equations One-sided equation Symmetric pseudo observation equation t autocorrelation function

  19. 6. Data Adjustment • the Unified Least Squares Adjustment

  20. 7. Implementation • To reduce the number of parameters, only the parameters of lines containing image observations are implemented. • For the memory management, IMSL Ver. 6.0 library is used. IMSL contains a sparse matrix solver. • riptide.ecn.purdue.edu • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 operating systems • 16 multi core processors • 64GB of system memory

  21. 8. Results • Processing time : 49 seconds (16 core x86_64 Linux with 64GB ram) • Number of iteration : 7 • Converged at 0.58 pixels • RMSE : 1.08 pixels for 8 check points

  22. 8. Results • Interior Orientation parameters are self-calibrated

  23. 9. Conclusions • We could successfully recover the orientation parameters using stochastic trajectory model • Interior orientation parameters of three cameras can be refined through the self calibration process

  24. 9. Future Plans • Analysis on the model properties • Adding pass points • Automated passpoints generation

More Related