1 / 11

T GS Salt Identification Challenge

This project aims to identify salt deposits in seismic images using a 2-stage Res-Unet model with data augmentation, cross-validation, and voting. Achieved an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.839 (0.858), ranking at 10%. Lessons learned and potential improvements discussed.

lyled
Download Presentation

T GS Salt Identification Challenge

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TGS Salt Identification Challenge ——Zheming Wang CourseWorkofCS539inFall2018

  2. Introduction Salt deposits below the surface is a big obstacle for oil and gas drillers. To detect them, expert human interpretation is still a must nowadays. The goal of this project is to tell the salt region with given seismic image as follow:

  3. Data and method The data comes from the TGS challenge on Kaggle. The picture size is 101*101, while the train and test sets have sizes of 4,000 and 18,000. ThetoolkitIuseisKeraswithTensorFlowasbackendinpython. The code I used mainly referred to some kernels on Kaggle. I keep the metric and data transforming partunchanged, revised the model structure, and wrote some code to make the training resumable and automatic on Euler.

  4. Basic Summary It is a typical image segmentation problem and there is a specific metric called Intersection over Union (IoU). In this project, I start from a baseline U-net model with IoU of 0.675(0.700) , ranking at 81%. After trying different methods and do lots of fine tuning, I get a 2-stage Res-Unetmodel with data augmentation, cross validation and voting, which obtains IoU of 0.839(0.858) , ranking at 10%.

  5. Model Structure: U-net (baseline)

  6. Model Structure: Runet-revised (No resize)

  7. Result 1: model choosing Generalsetting Batchsize:32 Epochs:200 EarlyStop:10 Lrschedule: 1e-2/8/0.5/1e-5 Monitor:val_iou * Maydifferalittlepermodel.

  8. Result 2: fine-tuning

  9. Lessons Learned in Project 1. Keras has some problems when resume a saving model. After reading source code, I wrote a patch for it. https://github.com/wzmJimmy/MyKerasPatch 2. Parallelism did not accelerate single model training. I found this fact when trying Keras mult-gpu class. Then I changed to train multiple cross-validation like models at the same time. 3. In Data Science, the model choosing is a core problem, while the data preprocessing and hyper-parameter tuning can also make a great difference but need lots of experience and trails.

  10. Further improvement • Other techniques: • Transfer learning: using other network as anencoder. • Optimizer choosing: Adam,momentum,normalSGD. • Featureengineering:tellzero-or-somesaltfirst. • ……

  11. Thankyouforlistening.

More Related