1 / 34

Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught?

Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught?. Provision and outcomes in different settings for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities, July 2006. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught?. This presentation is based on four key questions.

lyle
Download Presentation

Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? Provision and outcomes in different settings for pupils withlearning difficulties and disabilities, July 2006

  2. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • This presentation is based on four key questions. • Which type of school is best for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities (LDD)? • What is good progress? • Do statements make a difference? • What needs to change to improve provision?

  3. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Does it matter where pupils are taught? • What do you think?

  4. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Key findings • Little difference in the quality of provision and outcomes for pupils across settings. • But mainstream schools with additionally resourced provision were better. • PRUs were the least successful.

  5. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Key finding • Pupils with even the most severe and complex needs were able to make outstanding progress in all types of settings.

  6. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Key finding • Pupils who worked with specialist teachers in mainstream settings made greater academic progress than when they had to rely on other types of support.

  7. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Key finding • Fewer pupils with complex needs were placed in mainstream schools. • But where these pupils were included and had access to specialist teachers they were likely to do as well as those taught in special schools.

  8. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Key finding • Mainstream and special schools continued to struggle to establish an equal partnership.

  9. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • The Training and Development Agency should: • improve training in the field of LDD for all teachers • provide more opportunities for specialist training.

  10. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • Local authorities should: • ensure that all pupils have opportunities to work alongside their peers in mainstream provision.

  11. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • Mainstream schools should: • analyse critically their use of teaching assistants and the amount of specialist teaching they provide.

  12. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • Special schools should: • collaborate and share expertise more effectively with mainstream schools.

  13. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • How can you improve? • Ethos • Specialist staff • Focused professional development for all staff • Flexibility and responsiveness to individual needs

  14. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • How can you improve? • Pupils’ involvement • Being part of a wider community • Curriculum • Links with parents

  15. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Too little has been done nationally to focus schools’ attention on improving the achievement of pupils in the lowest quartile.

  16. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • How do you know pupils are enjoying and achieving? What is good progress for pupils with LDD?

  17. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Key findings • Schools were improving the analysis of data about their pupils’ learning. • But only four schools understood clearly what was meant by ‘good’ progress for pupils with LDD.

  18. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • The Department for Education and Skills should: • clarify what is meant by ‘good’ progress for pupils with LDD.

  19. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • Schools of all types should: • agree upon what is meant by ‘good’ progress for pupils with LDD.

  20. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • Local authorities should: • before reorganisation, rigorously evaluate the impact of provision on the outcomes for children and young people with LDD.

  21. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • How can you improve?

  22. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Use information about outcomes more effectively to: • Plan future priorities • Challenge the progress pupils make • Set targets for improvement in the three areas of learning: academic; personal; social

  23. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Is a statement of SEN a good thing?

  24. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Key findings • The process of obtaining a statement disadvantaged pupils with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties (BESD). • It favoured those with a diagnosis of medical need(s).

  25. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Key finding • Statements generated additional resources. • But they did not guarantee the quality of the provision or the outcomes for the pupil.

  26. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • The Department for Education and Skills should: • work more closely with other government departments to ensure common assessments focused on outcomes are used to identify individual needs, in line with developments for the range of children’s services.

  27. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • Local authorities should: • ensure that children and young people with BESD have full access to a range of services, taking family and social circumstances into account as well as their particular educational needs

  28. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • How can you improve?

  29. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • What factors should influence the changes in provision to improve the outcomes for every child and young person with LDD?

  30. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Key findings • Every Child Matters has required local authorities to review structures and provision for pupils with LDD. • But too few authorities were basing changes on a rigorous analysis of the outcomes for children and young people.

  31. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • Recommendation • Local authorities should: • take full account of the impact of provision and services on the outcomes for children and young people before any strategic reorganisation of services.

  32. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • What next?

  33. Inclusion: does it matter where pupils are taught? • This presentation is based on four key questions. • Which type of school is best for pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities (LDD)? • What is good progress? • Do statements make a difference? • What needs to change to improve provision?

More Related