1 / 18

ON GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES FOR CLOUD RESOURCES AND ASSESSING THEIR EFFECTIVENESS

ON GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES FOR CLOUD RESOURCES AND ASSESSING THEIR EFFECTIVENESS. Acklesh Prasad QUT Business School – Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Peter Green Jon Heales UQ Business School – University of Queensland Brisbane , Queensland, Australia .

lydie
Download Presentation

ON GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES FOR CLOUD RESOURCES AND ASSESSING THEIR EFFECTIVENESS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ON GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES FOR CLOUD RESOURCES AND ASSESSING THEIR EFFECTIVENESS Acklesh Prasad QUT Business School – Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Peter Green Jon Heales UQ Business School – University of Queensland Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

  2. Introduction • Some Key Issues Shared ……. • Data Analytics • Big Data • Cost/Benefit • Data Mining and Fraud Detection • Dynamic • Sustainable Competitive Advantage • Version 1  Version 2 (No Money)

  3. Introduction • Cloud resources provide opportunities and challenges to businesses. • However, acquiring IT resources as a utility from the cloud is gaining momentum. • Cloud presents better and more economical ways to continue to embed modern IT resources in information systems (IS). • Overall, organizations interest in cloud resources will continue to increase. • Gartner (2012)…. “Cloud computing to be a $206.6 billion business by 2016.” • Fratto (2012)… “Cloud computing is coming to your organization, like it or not.”

  4. Introduction • The resource is the same (IT), but the nature of commitment, relationship management, and expectation from the resource is different. • Marston et al., (2011) “CIOs and CTOs should proactively develop an overall “cloud strategy” in order to determine a time-based plan about which of their applications they can move to the cloud, and the timeframes associated with each of them.” • Governance structures for IT resources require consideration. • Fratto (2012) “A governance plan gives the cloud IT the proactive control needed to proceed safely.” • Eventually, it has to embed into organizations overall IT governance structures.

  5. Introduction • Focus of this research • Higher level of cloud governance consideration • The current position on cloud governance: • Practice-based conceptual deliberations on the benefits of cloud services and the surrounding technologies (for example, KPMG and Gartner resources). • Academic contribution is starting to focus on business-related issues surrounding cloud computing (see for example, Brumec and Vrček, 2013; Marston et al., 2011; Misra and Mondal, 2011; Sultan, 2010). • This research - to blend these thoughts and suggest appropriate higher level IT governance structures for cloud resources.

  6. The Key Research Issue What are the appropriate IT governance structures for managing cloud resources to achieve cloud-related business objectives?

  7. Conceptually….. • Cloud-based business objectives - achieving outcomes relating to improved agility, better creativity and innovation, and simplicity of IT systems • Cloud-related financial objectives - better returns on investment in IT, improvement in total IT lifecycle costs, and better response to economic conditions.

  8. What should be the Nature of Cloud Governance Structures? • Cloud resources/adoption of cloud resources will be dynamic. • Robotics and Assurance Analogy • To source “new” value: • Governance structures would need to be dynamic – Ability to build capacity to continue to leverage “new” value from the cloud resources. • Resource-Centric View and Dynamic Capabilities Framework • New players with continuous commitment and engagement. Governance structures would have a relational component. Shared governance. • Relational view of the firm

  9. Investigation Approach • A Triangulation approach • A set of possible IT governance structures for managing cloud resources. • Subsequent – Validation of the (model) with a field survey.

  10. The Model of Cloud Governance Business Objectives Financial Objectives

  11. The Model of Cloud Governance • Chief Cloud Officer - expertise, initiator, the dynamic component, local expertise, proactive. • Cloud Management Committee– overall cloud direction, strategy, steering role. • Cloud Service Facilitation - issue resolution center, develop and administer performance monitoring, manage change facilitation, and consider tactical decisions relating to cloud services economics of cloud, (cloud provider risk assessment, and enterprise agreements.) • Cloud Relationship Centre - relationship management, cloud service gateway, dynamic and continuous relationship between corporate IT and business units, communication of cloud related security, architecture standards, and integration requirements, and business unit compliance, security in cloud, the possibility of changing business models quickly.

  12. Validation Approach • Survey • Perceptions of Actual and Potential Cloud Adopters on the suggested governance structures and the business and financial objectives

  13. Cloud Governance Structures and Business Objectives

  14. Cloud Governance Structures and Business Objectives

  15. Discussion • The impetus to seek cloud services is gaining momentum. • A proactive approach to governance of cloud resources is desirable. • Four cloud governance structures that focus on initiation  decision making  fit  relationship management. • Overall - continuous and careful thought, perceived good fit of the prospective cloud resources, and subsequent actual implementation of the services into the business processes. • Value Trajectory - cloud-related business objectives  cloud-related financial objectives.

  16. Contributions • Formal thought on and validation of possible cloud governance structures. • Consideration on the element of dynamics in cloud governance structures  possible with the suggested four structures. • The importance of managing relations with key stakeholders yet, owning cloud governance. • Ways to determine whether path to the cloud is still feasible.

  17. Key Points • Cloud computing is here to stay. • Utility approach to acquiring IT resources will increase. • Organizations responsibility of appropriately managing their IT resources remain • With cloud resources • A proactive approach • A relational element • The importance of a dynamic element

  18. Thank You Questions and Comments

More Related