1 / 63

TeamMembers

TeamMembers. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002). Team members of the. Team members of the. Angela Ribas. Architect:. UC Berkeley. Matthias Niebling. Engineer:. Bauhaus-University Weimar, Germany. Construction Manager:. Kevin Coyne. Stanford University. Product Manager:.

lvanwyk
Download Presentation

TeamMembers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TeamMembers CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Team members of the Team members of the Angela Ribas Architect: UC Berkeley Matthias Niebling Engineer: Bauhaus-University Weimar, Germany Construction Manager: Kevin Coyne Stanford University Product Manager: Torsten Schluesselburg FH Aargau, Switzerland David Steinbach Owner: Weimar, Germany

  2. Location CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) • SURROUNDING: • GOLDEN GATE PARK • RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD • HILL AREA (HUGE GREEN AREA) CAMPUS LOCATION CAMPUS LOCATION • BAY AREA / CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO • UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO • MAIN CAMPUS AT FULTON STREET

  3. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) CAMPUS VIEW CAMPUS VIEW N Map

  4. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) SURROUNDING BUILDINGS SURROUNDING BUILDINGS SITE MAP Textures

  5. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) SITE SITE N PANORAMIC VIEW • FLAT GROUND • FACING FULTON STREET SITE MAP Building location

  6. A_First concept CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FOREST “AN OPEN AND FRIENDLY SPACE WHERE PEOPLE CAN INTERACT” CORE VIEW Concept

  7. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FIRST FLOOR PLAN Plan

  8. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT BASEMENT Plan

  9. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SECOND FLOOR Plan

  10. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT THIRD FLOOR Plan

  11. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT N C B B A A C SECTION AA SECTION BB SECTION CC Sections

  12. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FIRST ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT N SOUTH FACADE SOUTH FACADE NORTH FACADE NORTH FACADE EAST FACADE TOP VIEW Elevations WEST FACADE

  13. A1_E_SOLUTION1 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

  14. Loading assumptions CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) • First floor corridors / Stairs / Lobbies • Storage • Auditorium, Offices • Classrooms • Corridors above first floor • Finishes, Lights • HVAC installation (ducts, etc) • Partition walls • Wind load • RAIN LOAD 100 psf 125 psf 30 psf 10 psf 13 psf 50 psf 80 psf 20 psf 40 psf 5 psf 1.92 kN/m² 4.79 kN/m² 6.00 kN/m² 3.83 kN/m² 2.40 kN/m² 1.44 kN/m² 0.48 kN/m² 0.24 kN/m² 0.96 kN/m² 0.64 kN/m² STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM DEAD LOADS: LIVE LOADS: LATERAL LOADS: Load Assumptions

  15. Concrete Walls CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Typical element sizes: Concrete walls: 12“ Structural elements

  16. Girders CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls Girders Possible sections of a column 16“ 15“ typical column / girder connection STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Structural elements

  17. 2 former Solutions CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls Solution 1 Girders Solution 2 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM • Composite floor deck • Bays of 30 x 30 ft • Advantage: only 4 columns needed • Steel Frame Structure • Spans of 15 ft (concrete elements) and • 30 ft (steel frames) • Advantage: slab can be thin (reduction of dead loads) Former solutions

  18. Typical element sizes CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls Girders • only 4 columns Secondary Beams • reduced slab thickness • Small Girders: 12“ (HEB 280) • Large Girders: 15“ (HEB 360) Columns (in basement): ø 16“ with a steel thickness of 1/3“ STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Most economic compromise: takes the advantages of both structural solutions Typicalelement sizes: • Concrete walls: 12“ • Slab: Compositefloor deck, total height: 4 ¾“ • Secondary beams: 8“ (HEA 200) Typical element sizes

  19. Gravity Load Path1 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls Girders Secondary Beams Gravity Load Path STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Gravity Load Path1

  20. Gravity Load Path2 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls Girders Secondary Beams Gravity Load Path STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

  21. Gravity Load Path3 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls Girders Secondary Beams Gravity Load Path STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

  22. Gravity Load Path4 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls Girders Secondary Beams Gravity Load Path STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

  23. Gravity Load Path5 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Gravity Load Path STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

  24. Foundation MainBuilding CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Line loads Column loads STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Foundation will be: • a ground plate with a height of 15“ • at the positions of concentrated loads (columns): strengthening of the ground plate up to 24“ Foundation – Main Building

  25. Foundation Auditoroium CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Line loads STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Foundation will be: • a ground plate with a height of 15“ • at the positions of concentrated loads (columns): strengthening of the ground plate up to 24“ • the floor of the auditorium is declined. • using a stepping instead of declination -> horizontal loads (out of gravity loads) are avoided Foundation - Auditorium

  26. Lateral Load Path Left CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls Lateral Load Paths STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Symmetrical plan: • no additional moment occurs

  27. Lateral Load Path Right CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Concrete walls N • can be compensatet by two normal forces N e S M N Lateral Load Paths STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Asymmetrical plan: • additional moment (M=N·e)

  28. Outside Wall CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) • it is necessary to build a moment resisting frame structure Lateral Load Paths STRUCTURAL SYSTEM STRUCTURAL SYSTEM Outside concrete walls: • do not act as a slab because of number of openings • high amount of reinforcement is needed

  29. A1_C_Slide1 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN Existing Buildings Site Access (Fulton) Project Office Material Laydown & Storage Crane Building Perimeter Site Perimeter Site plan

  30. A1_C_Slide2 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) CONCEPT #1: CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT #1: CONSTRUCTION • EXCAVATION: • 18’ Hard Strata Excavation – No retaining wall necessary • FOUNDATION: • Poured Reinforced Concrete Mat Slab w/ Column Footings • SUPERSTRUCTURE A: • Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame • Cast-in-Place Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls • Cast-in-Place Composite Concrete/Steel Floor System • SUPERSTRUCTURE B: • Steel Moment Frame • Cast-in-Place Composite Concrete/Steel Floor System • EXTERIOR FACADE: • Concrete and Glass Curtain Wall System Materials and Methods

  31. A1_C_Slide3 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) CONCEPT #1: COST CONCEPT #1: COST Structural Solution #1: Structural Solution #2: • Concrete Moment Frame • Concrete Shear Walls • Steel Moment Frame • Concrete Shear Walls Total Cost = $6,070,122 Per S.F. = $164.06 Total Cost = $5,892,664 Per S.F. = $159.26

  32. A1_C_Slide2 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) CONCEPT #1: SCHEDULE CONCEPT #1: SCHEDULE Schedule Duration = 9 months Start: 9/20/2015 – End: 7/7/2016 Schedule Duration = 9 months Start: 9/20/2015 – End: 7/7/2016 MILESTONE #1: 3/01/16 – Foundation Complete MILESTONE #2: 5/10/16 – Shell Complete MILESTONE #3: 9/30/16 – Move-In Conceptual Schedules

  33. A_Second concept CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) • Plaza • Suspended box • Open auditorium below • “The crane” - A / E idea • Suspended auditorium • very expensive • Bridge idea for suspension • Owner requested round forms • “The bridge curve” • access and circulation issues SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT CONCEPTUAL IDEAS Progress

  34. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT PLAZA “A PLAZA SURROUNDED BY WATER” Concept

  35. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT FIRST FLOOR PLAN Plan

  36. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT BASEMENT PLAN Plan

  37. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SECOND FLOOR PLAN Plan

  38. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT THIRD FLOOR PLAN Plan

  39. CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SECOND ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT N A A S / N FACADE SECTION AA E / W FACADE EAST / WEST FACADE SOUTH / NORTH FACADE TOP VIEW Section / Elevations

  40. A2_E_SOLUTION1 CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Architectural sketch • Width: 100 ft • Length: 145 ft Engineering model STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1

  41. Constraints CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) • as well as concrete walls in the core (Elevators, Restrooms) STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 Solution 1 • the whole building is based on 4 large columns at the corners • an additional 4 columns in the core

  42. Gravital Structure CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Girders Secondary Beams • Additionally, secondary beams will be used to reduce the span of the slab STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 In each slab there will be 4 large girders • to collect gravity loads and transport them to the framework and the core columns Gravity Structure

  43. Framework CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Girders Secondary Beams STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 Realizing the large span by a huge framework: • to collect gravity loads and transport lateral loads • to reduce deformation of the slabs Gravity Structure

  44. Element sizes CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Girders Secondary Beams • Small Girders: 14“ (HEB 340) • Large Girders: 24 1/2“ (HEM 600) STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 Framework Typical Element sizes: • Slab: Composite floor deck, total height: 4 ¾“ (Span ~11ft) • Secondary beams: 8“ (HEA 200) • Core Columns: 20“ x 20“ • Outside Columns: 40“ x 40“ (Assumption) Typical element sizes

  45. GravityLoadPath CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Gravity Load Path STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 Forces are transported: • from secondary beams to the girders • from girders to the outside framework and the inner core • by vertical elements into the ground

  46. Lateral Structure CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) • Note – detailed calculations will need to be completed to determine the feasibility of this solution (due to massive framework) STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 Stiffening the inside of the box by EBF‘s (eccentric braced frames): • Advantage – in case of an earthquake, EBF‘s can absorb some of energy Lateral Resisting Structure

  47. LateralLoadPath_Left CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Lateral Load Paths STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 Symmetrical plan: • no additional moments occur

  48. LateralLoadPath_Top CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) Lateral Load Paths STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 Symmetrical plan: • no additional moments occur

  49. Foundation Columns CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) • the core columns are supposed to be thinner and more ductile, allowing for deformation in case of an earthquake • these two columns are connected to the wall of the auditorium STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 Foundation of the columns is critical because of seismic issues: • the outside columns must be able to rock -> base isolation system Foundation

  50. FoundationBasement CEE 222 - Computer Integrated AEC (2002) STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 STRUCTURAL SYSTEM #1 Foundation of the basement: • will be a ground plate • in the core, a strengthening of the ground plate becomes necessary (columns) Foundation

More Related