1 / 20

A Study of the Success of Local Wildlife Rehabilitation

By: Marli Milano. A Study of the Success of Local Wildlife Rehabilitation. Introduction. Rehabilitation is used after circumstances that have harmful effects to wildlife such as: Oil spills H uman activities involving pollutants or land clearing

lundy
Download Presentation

A Study of the Success of Local Wildlife Rehabilitation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. By: MarliMilano A Study of the Success of Local Wildlife Rehabilitation

  2. Introduction • Rehabilitation is used after circumstances that have harmful effects to wildlife such as: • Oil spills • Human activities involving pollutants or land clearing • Rehabilitation enables animals injured due to human activities to survive • Lessens amount of endangered animals due to human causes

  3. Introduction • Pollution released by humans causes birth defects in animals • abnormal pigmentation • missing or too many limbs and/or toes • missing eyes • body too small for internal organs • abnormal scales • spinal problems such as scoliosis • (Bell et al. 2006)

  4. Introduction • Animals are rehabilitated for injuries such as: • shock and dehydration • head trauma • physical wounds • musculoskeletal conditions such as bone fractures • (Casey and Casey, 2004)

  5. Introduction • Many think that rehabilitation is too costly • rehabilitation of oiled wildlife makes up only 1% of all cleanup costs • (Jessup and Mazet, 1999 [Averett, 1997])

  6. Purpose & Methodology To find which rehabilitation strategies work best for which injuries by: • Surveying local rehabilitators through: • Email surveys • Face-to-face survey interview

  7. Methodology • 97 email surveys were sent out • Email addresses were acquired from www.wrc.nys.com • 5 emails didn’t send due to incorrect email addresses • 1 face-to-face interview was conducted • 3 rehabbers were unable to open survey file • 4 said this season is too busy to fill out the survey • 1 said this is a “gravely flawed” paper

  8. Survey • What types of injuries were seen? Which injuries are most common? • How do the injuries come about (i.e. oil spill, human activities, caused by other animals, motor vehicles)? What is the most common cause? • How often are animals found with these types of injuries? • How long were injured animals kept in captivity? • How does the injury affect the length of time an animal is kept in captivity? • What is the longest amount of time an animal can be in captivity? • What type of animal is most frequently seen for rehabilitation?

  9. Survey (contd.) • Were follow-ups done after release of rehabilitated animals to find out if rehabilitation was successful or not? • If so, how often was rehabilitation successful? • What animals most often have successful results from rehabilitation? • What animals do not succeed after rehabilitation? • How often do you change your rehabilitation techniques to stay current with changing technologies?

  10. Results • Animals are most commonly seen for collision wounds or after being abandoned • Most injuries are from human related causes i.e. vehicles, domestic pets • Animals are seen throughout the year • Mostly April-November • Animals are kept for up to life depending on injury and chance of survival • Rodents, turtles, and birds are most often seen for rehabilitation • Follow-ups are not typically done • Rehab is considered successful if animal is released • Sooner the animal is found after wounded, the more successful it will be • Rabbits, deer and birds often do not make it through rehab • Techniques are changed frequently to stay up-to-date with changing technology

  11. Commonly Seen • Most common rehab reasons: • Broken bones • Open/puncture wounds • Malnutrition • Head traumas • Orphaned

  12. Cause of Injury • Animals are often seen for injuries caused by: • Human activities: • Vehicle collisions • Improper adoption of orphaned animals • Domestic pet attacks

  13. Timing • Animals are mostly found from April to November • Turtles: • April – October • Peak: May - June • Birds: • Spring • Rodents: • Spring & autumn

  14. Time Period in Rehab • Animals can remain in rehab for up to their entire lifetime • If unable to be released they will be used for education • Time depends on injury • Animal will be kept as long as necessary for healing

  15. Commonly Seen Animals • Rodents • Rabbits • Squirrels • Birds • Turtles • Deer

  16. Release Success • Any released animal is considered a successful rehabilitation • Rabbits are most difficult to rehabilitate • Orphaned animals are easiest to release as long as don’t imprint on humans

  17. Changing Techniques • Rehabbers change techniques constantly • Each animal requires different technology & different attention • Conferences are held to discuss new techniques

  18. Future Research • More time should be given for rehabbers to answer emails • Lettered answer choices should be given to increase effectiveness of study • Choices make organizing answers easier • Face-to-face interviews are more productive; it is easier to understand and get straight, thorough answers

  19. Acknowledgements Thank you to all the New York rehabilitators who answered this survey

  20. References • Bell, Barbara; Spolita, James R. Congdon, Justin. High incidence of deformity in aquatic turtles in the John Heinz National Wildlife Refuge. Environmental pollution (142) [ online database]. 2006 [October 7, 2005; February, 2011]: 457-465. • Casey, Shirley J. Casey, Allan M. A survey of conditions seen in wildlife admittes for wildlife rehabilitation. [online database]. 2004 [2004; February 1, 2011]. • Doyle, Nancy D. Rehabilitation of fractures in small animals: maximize outcomes, minimize complications. Clinical techniques in small animal practices () [online database]. 2004 [2004; February 2,2011]:180-191. • Fischer, J. Lindenmayer, D.B. An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological conservation (96) [online database]. 2000 [February 17, 2000; February, 2011]: 1-11. • Fleming, Gregory J. Clinical technique: chelonian shell repair. Journal of exotic pet medicine [online database]. October, 2008 [October, 2008; February, 2011]; Vol 17 (4): 246-258. • Jessup, David A. Mazet, Jonna A.K. Rehabilitation of oiled wildlife: why do it? International Oil Spill Conference. • Molony, Susie E. Dowding, Claire V. Baker, Philip J. Cuthill, Innes C. Harris, Stephet. The effect of translocation and temporary captivity on wildlife rehabilitation success: an experimental study using European hedgehogs (Erinaceuseuropaeus.) Biological conservation (130) [online database]. 2006 [2006; January, 2011]: 530-537. • Saba, V.S. Spolita, J.R. Survival and behavior of freshwater turtles after rehabilitation from an oil spill. Environmental pollution [online database]. 2003 [14 May 2003; January 2011]126:213-223. • Shine, Richard; Koenig, Jennifer. Snakes in the garden: an analysis of reptiles “rescued” by community-based wildlife carers. Biological conservation (102) [online database]. November 16, 2000 [March 13, 2001; February 2, 2011

More Related