The Transmission Mechanisms of Monetary Policy. This paper presents in the first part the theoretical dimension of the transmission channels of monetary policy.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
If we imagine the economy like a large network of interconnecting institutions like banks, corporations, medium and small firms and households, finding a monetary transmission mechanism implies finding a connection starting at the Central Bank’s level and following the Central Bank’s transactions effect on the other players until the effect reach the real sector.
All the paths have one similarity – they must pass thought some financial market. Using this criteria we can classify the channels of monetary policy transmission it two sections:
The channels which involve the commercial lending market.
The channels that pass thought other markets.
The channels that operate through the commercial lending market are:
The interest rate (or money) channel
The credit channel
Bank lending channel
Balance sheet channel
Households liquidity effects
The bank lending channel (or credit channel in the strict sense) theory is based on the special role played by the banks, because they are very well suited to resolve asymmetric information problems in credit markets. Because of bank’s special role, certain borrowers will not have access to credit markets unless they borrow from a bank. So a central hypothesis of this channel is that credit is not substitutable with anything else. In fact this hypothesis is questioning the Miller – Modigliani theorem, because if this theorem is correct a tightening in monetary policy should have no effect on the banks and firms. Banks should be capable to raise alternative funds, for example issuing large CDs . So if Miler Modigliani theorem is correct a change in monetary policy is affecting only the structure of bank’s liability side of the balance sheet, and not the volume.
The key hypotheses in the bank lending channel are:
If mandatory reserve requirements are important, so are the chances that a monetary policy intervention will generate effect on the volume of credit. A reduction in
the liquidity will generate less opportunities to issue credit, because liquidity created by the Central Bank is more than legal money, is in a sense an issuing of credit right for the other banks in the system.
A possible problem, that could have put a question mark in the bank lending channel’s existence, is mentioned by an important number of studies, revealing the synchronization between the fall in industrial production and the fall in credit volume. The problem is determining who cause the other: credit falls first and influence output or the fall in output leads to a fall in credit demand an to a reduction in credit volume.
A possible answer at this answer is provided by Ramsey (1993, IMF) which determine that the credit volume after a tightening in monetary policy is not changing, the change is in the structure: less credit issued by banks and more commercial credit. He also presents the raising gap between interest rates of commercial credit and credit issued by banks in periods of tight monetary policy.
Examples of a functioning bank lending channel is provided for the following countries:
an important part of the system, are the ones responsible for the effectiveness of this channel because the small banks cannot shield large variation in resources volume. Another finding of this study is that small firms cannot shield their real expenses from bank credit fluctuations because they are denied the opportunity to use other sources for finance by the prohibitive costs.
Hernando considers that in the existence of the bank lending channel a very
important element is the tools or instruments used by the Central Bank, as an example he gives countries as UK and Japan, with a relative important bank lending channel, as a result, in the author’s view, of the tools used to control the credit volume.
The existence of this channel is die to asymmetric information. This channel is stressing the impact of the monetary policy on the balance sheet of the firms, and the relationship between the balance sheet of the firm and the problems of asymmetric information and the forms taken by this, the adverse selection and the moral hazard.
If the monetary policy is relaxed it’s obvious that prices of the assets of the firms are increasing and so is the net value. A grater net value diminishes the risk generated by adverse selection and moral hazard.
The lax monetary policy could also reduce the interest rate, which in time improves the cash flow of the firm, so this is another factor in diminishing the adverse selection and moral hazard problems.
Another possible channel could involve as a result of a lax monetary policy an increase in the non anticipated price levels, reduces the value of the credits that firms have taken, increasing the net value of the firm, with the same consequences as presented before on adverse selection and moral hazard.
The effect of the monetary policy has been focused a long time on the effect on the balance sheet of firms, but effect are created in the balance sheets of households too. The asymmetry in this case is not in the credit market but in the market of durable goods, which generate a under pricing for this items. So, any decision involving durable good is viewed as an investment decision.
A lax monetary policy leads to higher prices of the assets and an increase of the financial assets. This leads to a smaller probability of financial problems in the future and the households can spend more on durable goods and houses. The increased spending is leading to a rise in demand and ultimately in output.
The reduced liquidity of this assets (durable good, houses) is due to the asymmetric information on these markets, and this reduced liquidity makes consumers reluctant in buying these types of assets. If the households have doubts about the probability of financial problems in the future they will invest their money in financial assets, with no consequence on output as previously presented.
The difference between the balance sheet channel and this channel is that not the willingness of lenders to lend cause expenditure to rise but the willingness of consumers to spend.
The channels that operate through other markets than the commercial lending market are:
The exchange rate channel
Stock market channel
Tobin’s q theory
Durable goods price channel
The exchange rate channel, with the internationalization of economies throughout the world and the advent of flexible exchange rates, has received an increasing attention than in the past. This channel also involves changes in interest rates because the interest rate differential between the countries creates capital migration and exchange rate modifications. Fluctuations in the exchange rate leads to increased or decreased in the price of exports denominated in the foreign currency, and leads to increases or decreases in export production and of course in the output level. Also imports are cheaper or more expensive with exchange rate fluctuations, and domestic consumption can be persuaded by the change in prices to consume more domestic goods or more foreign goods.
The exchange rate channel is very important in small open economies.
Examples of countries with significant exchange rate channels are:
is augmented, in the view of the author, with a wealth effect generated by changes in the exchange rate because the prices of the durable goods and houses are denominated in foreign currency.
The stock market channel of monetary policy has been ignored a long period of time. This channel is based on variations of the equities (stock) prices. The main two sub channels of transmission are: the Tobin’s q theory and wealth effects.
The stock market provides a very important function for firms – the possibility to raise capital. A change in the monetary policy has immediate and powerful effects on the equities prices. As the economies all over the world are in a process of deregulation, the importance of the stock market channel is increasing. Also the generalized involvement in the stock market of households and firms (40% of USA population are shareholders compared with just 27% in 1984, as revealed by Chami, Cosimano, Fullenkamp, 1999, IMF) is increasing the role the stock market is playing in monetary policy transmission. Another factor that accentuate the importance of this channel is the increased sensitivity of firms management at equities price variation in the market. Changes in price are followed by rapid and important investment policy changes. Another factor is the institutional nature of the stockholders (30% of the shares in USA is held by mutual funds and another 50% by other institutions like pension funds). This institutional nature of the stock holders leads to a rise in the frequency of management changes, this also making management more receptive to
stockholder’s interests. This evolutions also lead to more efficient stock markets and to rapid reactions by management, usually anticipating the stockholders decision.
With an ever increasing number of individuals and institutions buying shares, with the influence of the shareholders on the management increasing, and with decisions in investment policies of the firms closely followed by the owners, the stock market channel has an important role to play in the transmission mechanism of monetary policy in the future.
James Tobin developed a theory that explains how monetary policy can affect the economy through its effects on the valuation of equities. Tobin defines the q coefficient as the market value of firms divided by the replacement cost of the capital.
If q is high the market price of firms is high relative to its replacement costs and a new plant and equipment is cheap relative to the market value of the firm. Companies are able to issue stock and get a high price. Investment spending will rise because firms can buy a lot of new investment goods with only a small issue of stock.
If q is low the firms will not made new investments but buy another firm cheaply and acquire old capital instead.
The link of this theory with the monetary policy is through the prices of equity in the stock market. An increase of money supply will lead to a rise demand for stock, to higher prices and to high q coefficient.
This theory was tested by Chami, Cosimano, Fullenkamp (1999, IMF) and the results were disappointing. The problems could be the way the q coefficient is defined or the inability to measure it correctly.
The balance sheet of households can be an important explicative factor in monetary transmission mechanism and the life cycle theory of F. Modigliani provides the theoretical base. Modigliani’s theory emphasize that consumers are optimally adjusting their consumption taking into account the resources that are available now as well as the resources that will be available in the future. The financial wealth is an important part of the consumer’s resources and an increase in the price levels of equity, generated by an increasing money supply, can lead to a rise in resources available in the future, and to a rise in the present consumption.
Tobin’s q theory can be applied to other markets too, for example the housing market or land market. A rise in the q coefficient on this markets, as a result of higher prices determined by a lax monetary policy, will stimulate the production of houses. Land prices are a very important part of the wealth of an individual or firm, and an increase generates an shift in the consumption behavior, with effects on aggregated demand and output.
Time series utilized
Granger causality tests
Variations in IP and the importance of the other variables
Response functions – unrestricted VAR
3 variable - unrestricted VAR
6 variable - unrestricted VAR
Tests of stationarity
Mandatory reserves requirements
Real evolution of Crng, M2, Ref
Knowing the degree of control of the monetary base by the NBR, the effect of each monetary instrument, we can assess the force and the implications of the instruments that can be used by the Central Bank.
One instrument, very powerful and intimately linked with the credit channel is the mandatory reserve requirements. The frequent change in the rates of the mandatory reserves is another important proof in supporting the existence of a strong credit channel in Romania. The purpose of these changes is to influence the liquidity available to banks and the level of credit available to the economy.
Because mandatory reserves are applied only on certain types of deposits, it may be important to calculate the evolution of the percent of reserves in money base and broad money.
It is important to notice that every change in reserve requirements has a powerful impact on the profit and loss account of the bank, and if the changes are very swift and very wide, the consequences could be a very difficult situation for the banking system, especially for the banks with less liquidity. So the use of reserve requirement must be gradual and combined with an increase of the interest rate used to remunerate the reserve requirements.
Also the instruments of monetary policy had changed from refinancing credit to deposits attracted by the NBR. Refinancing credit was abandoned; the volume has dropped in nominal terms, and the change in real terms was more abrupt. The graph is a short representation of refinancing credit in real terms having the start of 1991 as a mark. The change in the structure of refinancing credit is very significant, especially the drop in auctions credit and the raise of special credits, which are uses mainly to save bank in a poor financial situation.
Another important element in the changes that has happened in Romania is the crowding-out effect, the substitution by the state of the private enterprises as borrowers. The nongovernmental credit is replaced by governmental credit.
Also nongovernmental credit denominated in lei is replaced by nongovernmental credit denominated in a foreign currency.
The bank-lending channel is probably equally important. The large contribution of nongovernmental credit variations at changes in output has been demonstrated in this paper. On the other hand maybe the simultaneous reduction of real nongovernmental credit and industrial production in recent years is not a coincidence.
The channel of the household’s liquidity is also very weak considering the poor development of consumption credit and the continuous fall in the sales of durable goods.
Of course the present paper can be improved, the usage of VAR methods can be criticize in some respects, so future studies should use structural VARs, or another quantitative methods needed to offset the “Lucas critique”.
In the following years one can expect the Central Bank to continue to use monetary aggregates as intermediary objectives, moreover due to the ceilings on NDA and floors on NIR imposed by the agreements with the IMF.
In the log term the structural changes in the Romanian economy will lead to changes in monetary transmission mechanisms, as in other countries had already happened. The credit channel will decrease in role and other channels will take its place. Significant steps in this transformation will be a real liquid secondary market for bonds, a more efficient stock market, a smaller degree of dependence upon the Central Bank for the commercial banks, etc.
In order to achieve the ambitious objectives that Romania presented to the EU, the monetary policy will retain it’s importance, and the topic of the transmission mechanism will be a central problem, because only knowing the most efficient transmission mechanism the optimal decisions can be made and implemented. In order to understand the transmission mechanism a methodic and periodic study of this problem is needed, and in a rapidly changing economy the problem is more acute.