1 / 16

Department of Information Engineering University of Padova, ITALY

Department of Information Engineering University of Padova, ITALY. Special Interest Group on NEtworking & Telecommunications. Carrier–Sense ARQ: Squeezing Out Bluetooth Performance while Preserving Standard Compliancy. Andrea Zanella. andrea.zanella@dei.unipd.it.

luisa
Download Presentation

Department of Information Engineering University of Padova, ITALY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of Padova, ITALY Special Interest Group on NEtworking & Telecommunications Carrier–Sense ARQ: Squeezing Out Bluetooth Performance while Preserving Standard Compliancy Andrea Zanella andrea.zanella@dei.unipd.it IEEE ICC 2009 June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  2. Motivations • Bluetooth was designed to be integrated in portable battery driven electronic devices  Energy Saving is a key issue! • Units periodically scan radio channel for valid packets • Scanning takes just the time for a valid packet to be recognized • Units that are not addressed by any valid packet are active for less than 10% of the time • WPAN market is expanding and it aims at becoming the standard the facto for short range communications  High Throughput is very welcome! • Bluetooth v2.0 + EDR (Enhanced Data Rate) promise bit rates up to 3 Mbps and faster node connections June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  3. A B B B B B H G F H Retransmissions NAK MASTER • Automatic Retransmission Query (ARQ): • Each data packet is transmitted and retransmitted until positive acknowledge is returned by the destination • Negative acknowledgement is implicitly assumed! • Errors on return packet determine transmission of duplicate packets (DUPCK) • Slave filters out DUPCKs by checking their sequence number • DUPCKs waste energy & throughput!!! • A. Zanella "A Mathematical Framework for the Performance Analysis of Bluetooth with Enhanced Data Rate" , IEEE Transactions on Communications, August 2009 • M. Valenti and M. Robert, “Custom coding, adaptive rate control, and distributed detection for bluetooth,” VTC 2002 ACK SLAVE X A DPCK B X DPCK June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  4. Aims of the work • Goal: • Improve performance by reducing the number of DUPCKs!!! • Method • Enhance the native ARQ scheme with Carrier Sense to avoid useless retransmissions • Carrier sensing is generally provided by last generation chipset • Carrier-Sense ARQ  CS-ARQ June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  5. Key idea • Carrier-sense can be used to infer transmission outcome in case slave’s reply is not received! • Idle channel: slave did not received master’s pck and, hence, did not reply • RTX is needed • Busy channel: slave sent back ACK or NAK that got lost • RTX may generate DUPCK!!! June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  6. Key idea (cont) • To avoid tx of DUPCKs, any time the slave’s feedback id doubtful (busy channel with no valid packet) enter a soliciting phase • In the soliciting phase • Suspend the ARQ scheme • Keep sending POLL packets until a valid frame is returned by the slave • Resume the ARQ scheme using the ACK info carried by the slave’s frame June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  7. CS-ARQ: state diagram June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany Fetch a new packet Tx packet & wait for feedback Slave’s feedback NAK ACK ACK No valid pck rcvd Carrier Sense Slave’s feedback BUSY NAK IDLE Tx POLL No valid pck rcvd

  8. Mathematical model (I) • Assumptions: • Single slave piconet • Saturated links • Master and slave have always packets waiting for transmission • Unlimited retransmission attempts • Packets are transmitted over and over again until positive acknowledgement • Static Segmentation & Reassembly policy • Unique packet type per connection • Independent error events in successive transmissions • Justified by FH • Model • CS-ARQ behavior described by by means of a 2-State Markov Chain • Define appropriate reward functions • Data, Energy, Time • Apply renewal reward theorem to get system performance • Throughput, energy efficiency, energy balancing, … June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  9. Mathematical Model (II) • State A  Standard ARQ phase • Master transmits packets that have never been correctly received by the slave • State S  Soliciting Phase • Master transmits POLLs waiting for a valid reply frame Reception Event Index Slaves rx Master rx • State transition probabilities depend on the reception events… • Ds = Data successful • AC ok, HEAD ok, CRC ok • Df = Data failure • AC ok, HEAD ok, CRC error • Hf = HEAD failure • AC ok, HEAD error • Af = AC failure • AC error June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany PAS 1-PAS 1-PSA PSA A S

  10. Mathematical Model (III) • State A  Standard ARQ phase • Master transmits packets that have never been correctly received by the slave • State S  Soliciting Phase • Master transmits POLLs waiting for a valid reply frame • The steady-state probabilities are, then, June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany PAS 1-PAS 1-PSA PSA A S

  11. Reward Functions • For each state j we define the following reward functions • Tj= Average amount of time spent in state j • Dj(x)= Average amount of data delivered by unit x{M,S} • Wj(x)= Average amount of energy consumed by unit x{M,S} • The average amount of reward earned in state j is given by • Performance indexes • Energy Efficiency:  • Goodput: G June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  12. Performance Analysis Results June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  13. Case study scenario • The model is general and can be applied to any other scenario • We here focus on a simple scenario as an example of the results that analysis enabled by the model • Case-study • Rayleigh fading • Same SNR at master & slave • Downlink traffic only June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  14. Goodput Std ARQ goodput • CS-ARQ yields from 20 kb/s to 100 kb/s goodput gain, provided that the correct packet format is selected • Single-slot packet formats do not bring any improvement • 2EDR is preferbale for SNR<20 dB, 3EDR for SNR>20 dB June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  15. Energy efficiency Std ARQ energy efficiency • CS-ARQ yields from 5% up to 40% energy efficiency gain • 2EDR is preferbale for SNR<20 dB, 3EDR for SNR>20 dB June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

  16. Conclusions • CS-ARQ yields some performance gain almost for free • Only requires CS capability and very limited software changes • Furthermore, CS-ARQ is • Fully Standard compliant • Complementary to other performance enhancement schemes • Stand-Alone (suffices to be implemented by the master) June 14-18 in Dresden, Germany

More Related