The benefits of biofeedback training for university students
Download
1 / 28

The Benefits of Biofeedback Training for University Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 108 Views
  • Uploaded on

The Benefits of Biofeedback Training for University Students. Barbara Morrell, Ph.D. Michael L. Maughan, Ed.D . Shannon Coetzee, B.S. Grant Gardner Karstin Slade, B.S. Brigham Young University Provo, Utah Presented at American Association of Physiology and Biofeedback Annual Conference

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' The Benefits of Biofeedback Training for University Students' - lucy-fulton


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
The benefits of biofeedback training for university students

The Benefits of Biofeedback Training for University Students

Barbara Morrell, Ph.D.

Michael L. Maughan, Ed.D.

Shannon Coetzee, B.S.

Grant Gardner

Karstin Slade, B.S.

Brigham Young University

Provo, Utah

Presented at American Association of

Physiology and Biofeedback Annual Conference

Monterrey, CA

February 16, 2007


Brigham young university stress management and biofeedback lab
Brigham Young University Stress Management and Biofeedback Lab

  • In operation since 1976

  • Integral part of the Counseling and Career Center

  • Utilize EMG, Thermal, GSR, HRV & Respiration modalities

  • 350 students seen in 900 sessions per year


Purpose of lab
Purpose of Lab Lab

  • To Provide Stress Management/Biofeedback training to help students:

    • Better manage school and other stressors

    • Develop Skills to reduce unwanted tension

    • Lessen interference of stress/anxiety with school performance & overall wellbeing

  • To Provide an Adjunct to Psychotherapy


Lab personnel
Lab Personnel Lab

  • 1 Psychologist Lab Supervisor/Admin

  • 1 Psychologist doing tx (4 hours/week)

  • 1 Graduate Assistant Coordinator

  • 2-3 Undergraduate lab assistants


Relaxation skills training
Relaxation Skills Training Lab

  • Body Scan

  • Autogenics

  • Diaphragmatic Breathing

  • Progressive Muscle Relaxation

  • Meditation

  • Visualization

  • Self-Hypnosis

  • Performance Rehearsal


Outreach presentations
Outreach Presentations Lab

  • Housing—On and Off campus

  • Campus classes

  • Workshops offered in Counseling Center

  • Stress Management Group in Counseling Center

  • Health Fairs


Purpose of research
Purpose of Research Lab

  • To better understand the experience of stress of students referred to the lab

  • To determine the effectiveness of biofeedback/relaxation training

  • To increase effectiveness of biofeedback/relaxation training


Research questions
Research Questions Lab

  • What subjective level of stress do students report on the average?

  • What are the major stress symptoms reported by students?

  • What are students major stresses?

  • What are the major ways students cope with stress?


Research questions1
Research Questions Lab

  • How effective is biofeedback/stress management training?

    • Pre-/Post- changes in EMG Readings?

    • Pre-/Post- change in Temp Readings?

  • How do student self-reports of level of stress change pre- and post- session?

  • Does practice between sessions improve effectiveness of training?


Subjective measures
Subjective Measures Lab

  • Student rating of stress for past week

  • Student beginning and ending BF session rating of stress level

  • Anonymous Student report of how useful, relaxing and effective the session was

  • Student report of between-session practice

    • Skill(s) practiced

    • Frequency

    • Effectiveness


Objective measures
Objective Measures Lab

  • EMG and Temperature BF Readings

    • Pre- and Post-treatment readings by session

    • Change in Post-treatment readings over several sessions


Preliminary data
Preliminary Data Lab

  • Data Collected from 09/2006 & 01/2007

  • Participants: N =158

  • BF Sessions: N = 282

  • Range: 1-13 sessions

  • Modal session #: 1 session

  • Anonymous Satisfaction surveys: N = 177











Preliminary results
Preliminary Results Lab

Students anonymously reported on average that their BF sessions were:

Not Informative Very Informative

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Not Relaxing Very Relaxing

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Not Useful Very Useful

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


Results of home practice

Average Usefulness rating of those who practiced was Lab6.64 out of 10

(10 point scale: O = Least useful; 10 = useful)

49% of students reported they practiced relaxation techniques during the previous week

Results of Home Practice


Self report rating of stress pre and post treatment
Self-Report Rating of Stress LabPre-and Post-Treatment

Avg Change = 3.555 (10 point scale: 0 = not stressed; 10 = most stressed)


Pre and post frontal emg recordings
Pre- and Post- Frontal LabEMG Recordings

Ave Change = 2.285



Preliminary conclusions
Preliminary Conclusions Lab

  • BF sessions are effective in reducing stress level in the short run based on subjective data and EMG/Temp readings

  • Students overwhelmingly report BF sessions to be helpful

  • Only half of BF trainees are engaging in home practice of relaxation techniques

  • Those who practice relaxation techniques report it to be useful


Future investigation
Future Investigation Lab

  • Do Pre-Post EMG/Temp BF readings improve significantly over multiple sessions?

  • Do weekly and pre-session subjective ratings decrease significantly over multiple sessions?

  • Do Students who practice show significantly greater improvement compared to those who don’t?

  • How do therapy clients compare to non-clients?


ad