150 likes | 380 Views
Chapter 10 Where Does Knowledge Come From?. 조숙환 swcho@sogang.ac.kr. 부전자 전 ? ( 박순천 그림 ). van Petrovich Pavlov,1849-1936 Pavlov’s dog. mental lexicon (abstract concept). a particular language is independent of a particular person’s thinking processes. Mentalist wars.
E N D
Chapter 10Where Does Knowledge Come From? 조숙환 swcho@sogang.ac.kr
mental lexicon(abstract concept) a particular language is independent of a particular person’s thinking processes
Mentalist wars Steinberg & Sciarini 2006 pp. 205-207 http://youtu.be/Rv2amqKJ5Rg http://youtu.be/SEBLt6Kd9EY http://youtu.be/9uSTEQy8DKg
EmpiricistsLocke (1690), Skinner (1957) The mind at birth is blank, tabula rasa. Ideas are derived “entirely through experience. Intelligence is NOT knowledge, buta means for acquiring knowledge, and is developed from the ideas imprinted by experiences in the mind. (p. 206)
EmpiricistsPutnam (1967) Humans are born with INTELLIGENCE that has developed through evolution. Intelligence “incorporate General Multi-purpose learning strategies” (e.g., word order, phonetic salience, frequency, memory functions, similarities, etc.) via inductive reasoning/analyses. (p. 206)
사례 WORD ORDER/SALIENCE/FREQUENCY/MEMORY (hippocampus 해마) 나는 사과를 먹었다. 사과를 나는 먹었다. 사과가 나에게 먹혔다. bachelor home vs. house ‘서강대학교’ ‘난 네가 좋아.’ ‘I think that Tom goes to school in Inchon.’
EmpiricistsPiaget Piaget posited “innate ‘indifferentiated schemas’ out of which intelligence would develop.” (p. 206) Piaget “preferred to derive intelligence from action and experience.” (p. 206) Note: Steinberg & Sciarini (2006) have not provided the details concerning Piaget. We will wait to discuss Piaget until we start Chapter 1. (- S. W. Cho)
RationalistsDescartes (1641) Basic ideas (God, triangle, etc.) are “already in the mind at birth,” and we use ‘reason’ in activating these ideas. (p. 207)
RationalistsChomsky (1959 – currently) Many ideas “are already in the mind at birth. There are ideas of a ‘distinct language nature,’ a set of innate language ideas called ‘Universal Grammar,’ existing independently of reason, logic, or intelligence. (p. 207)