1 / 41

CO 2 and Energy #2

CO 2 and Energy #2. Jasper Kok Applied Physics Program Climate science & policy enthusiast Lecture for AOSS 605, Ricky Rood. US energy use by sector. World CO 2 emissions by fuel and end use. Outline and review lecture 1. Lecture 1: Current and past energy use

lucio
Download Presentation

CO 2 and Energy #2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CO2 and Energy #2 Jasper Kok Applied Physics Program Climate science & policy enthusiast Lecture for AOSS 605, Ricky Rood

  2. US energy use by sector World CO2 emissions by fuel and end use Outline and review lecture 1 • Lecture 1: Current and past energy use • Historic CO2 emissions and energy use • Current sources of energy • Energy use and CO2 emissions of economic sectors • Energy use and CO2 emissions by end use

  3. Outline Lecture 2 • Lecture 2: Future energy use and climate change mitigation • ‘Business as usual’ • Do we need to act to prevent ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference’ in the climate system? • ‘Wedges’ to mitigate climate change • Energy supply decarbonization ‘tools’ • Energy efficiency • Renewable energies • Carbon capture and sequestration • Biofuels • Specific ‘wedges’ of mitigation • Externality: energy and water

  4. Key reference • The ‘wedge’ paper: “A plan to keep carbon in check” by Socolow and Pacala, Scientific American, 2006. • This is an influential policy-oriented paper on how to reform energy sector while still achieving economic growth • Accessible through http://mirlyn.lib.umich.edu

  5. Future energy policy: What are we trying to achieve? • The 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change was signed by most countries. Stated objective: “to achieve stabilization of GHG concentrations in the atmosphere at a low enough level to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system” The green countries have signed UNFCCC! • This should be done in a time frame sufficient: • to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change • to ensure that food production is not threatened • to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner • Does ‘business as usual’ allow this? If not, then what energy policies should we introduce (as a world community)?

  6. Outline Lecture 2 • Lecture 2: Future energy use and climate change mitigation • ‘Business as usual’ • Do we need to act to prevent ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference’ in the climate system? • ‘Wedges’ to mitigate climate change • Energy supply decarbonization ‘tools’ • Energy efficiency • Renewable energies • Carbon sequestration • Biofuels • Specific ‘wedges’ of mitigation • Externality: energy and water

  7. ≈ business as usual ‘Business as usual’ CO2-trajectory path • ‘Business as usual’ has CO2 emissions growing at current rate (1.5%/year) • Likely end-of-century warming: ~2.3 – 3.4 ºC

  8. ‘Business as usual’End-of-century temperature change • “Business as usual” (2090-2099) scenario • Global mean warming 2.8 ºC; • Much of land area warms by ~3.5 ºC • Arctic warms by ~7 ºC

  9. Will ‘business as usual’ lead to ‘dangerous’ climate change? • At > 2ºC • Ecosystems become threatened • Food supply jeopardized • Abrupt / irreversible changes (could lead to large-scale economic damage) • Many scientists think should prevent >2ºC warming  EU policy aimed at < 2ºC warming • So what is a ‘safe’ CO2 trajectory and how do we achieve it? Likely range of ‘business as usual’ by 2100

  10. CO2 stabilization trajectory • Need to stay below ~2 ºC to avoid ‘dangerous’ climate change.  Stabilize at < 550 ppm. Pre-industrial: 275 ppm, current: 385 ppm. • Need 7 ‘wedges’ of prevented CO2 emissions.

  11. Outline Lecture 2 • Lecture 2: Future energy use and climate change mitigation • ‘Business as usual’ • Why we need to act to prevent ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference’ in the climate system • ‘Wedges’ to mitigate climate change • Energy supply decarbonization ‘tools’ • Energy efficiency • Renewable energies • Carbon sequestration • Biofuels • Specific ‘wedges’ of mitigation • Externality: energy and water

  12. What is a ‘wedge’? • A ‘wedge’ is a strategy to reduce carbon emissions that grows from zero to 1 GtC/year in 50 years • The world needs to implement 7 of these wedges to prevent ‘dangerous’ climate change • Examples: • Expand wind energy • Make cars more efficient • Reduce deforestation rates

  13. Developing Vs. developed world • Implementation of wedges would lead to large emission reductions in developed world • Developing world would increase emissions, but less than without carbon constraints

  14. How and where to get the wedges • Need 7 wedges for 2xCO2 stabilization • Where and how is most cost-effective to cut CO2? • Tools wedges use: • Improved energy efficiency • Renewable energies (wind, solar) • Carbon capture and sequestration • Biofuels

  15. Outline Lecture 2 • Lecture 2: Future energy use and climate change mitigation • ‘Business as usual’ • Why we need to act to prevent ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference’ in the climate system • ‘Wedges’ to mitigate climate change • Energy supply decarbonization tools • Energy efficiency • Renewable energies • Carbon capture and sequestration • Biofuels • Specific ‘wedges’ of mitigation • Externality: energy and water

  16. Energy Decarbonization Tools:1. Efficiency Gains • The low-hanging fruit! • Essentially three kinds: • End-use electricity efficiency (fluorescent bulbs instead of incandescent bulbs) • Energy generation efficiency (coal plant operating at 60 % efficiency instead of current 40 %) • Transportation efficiency (60 mpg instead of 30 mpg) • Efficiency gains are generally cheap mitigation options • But will only get so far before cutting into primary energy used for economic activity

  17. Energy Decarbonization Tools: 2. Renewable energy • Hydro-power • Already widely used - not much potential for expansion • Wind • Abundant and competitive • Solar • Photovoltaic (PV) • Concentrating solar

  18. Wind energy cost in $/kWh Energy Decarbonization Tools: 2a. Wind • Probably most promising renewable energy source • Supplies ~1 % of world electricity, ~0.3 % in US • Is cost-effective against coal and natural gas • Is undergoing very rapid growth (5-fold increase 2000-2007)

  19. Energy Decarbonization Tools: 2a. Wind • Advantages: • Wind energy is relatively mature technology and is cost effective • Can be utilized at all scales • Large wind farms • On small agricultural farms • Total theoretical potential of wind energy on land/near shore is 5x current energy consumption Large potential for expansion

  20. Energy Decarbonization Tools: 2a. Wind • Disadvantages: • Dependent on Production Tax Credits provided by congress (~2 cents/kWh) to be competitive • President Obama’s stimulus package would extend these tax credits for 3 years. • Horizon pollution and NIMBY siting problems • Birds…(though this is often over-stated – about 1-2 birds per turbine per year) • Wind is intermittent! It can therefore not make up a large fraction of base load (unless effective energy storage)

  21. Energy Decarbonization Tools: 2b. Solar • Essentially three kinds: • Solar heat • Water is heated directly by sunlight • Used cost-effectively on small scale in houses • Solar photovoltaic (PV) • Uses photo-electric effect (Einstein!) to produce electricity • Supplies ~0.04 % of world energy use • Solar concentrated • Use large mirrors to focus sunlight on steam turbine or very efficient PV panels • More cost-effective than just PV

  22. Energy Decarbonization Tools: 2b. Solar • Advantages: • Enormous theoretical potential! • Applicable at various scales (individual houses to solar plants) • Solar heating can be cost effective • Economy of scale and/or breakthroughs might reduce costs of PV and solar concentrated • Disadvantages • PV and solar concentrated are expensive! Currently only cost-effective with government subsidies • Intermittent – can not make up large portion of base load (except with storage capability)

  23. Outline Lecture 2 • Lecture 2: Future energy use and climate change mitigation • ‘Business as usual’ • Why we need to act to prevent ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference’ in the climate system • ‘Wedges’ to mitigate climate change • Energy supply decarbonization tools • Energy efficiency • Renewable energies • Carbon capture and sequestration • Biofuels • Specific ‘wedges’ of mitigation • Externality: energy and water

  24. Energy Decarbonization Tools:3. Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) • Main idea: • Burn fossil fuels for electricity/hydrogen production • Capture CO2 • ‘Sequester’ it in geological formation, oil/gas field, or ocean floor • This principle is immensely important for future CO2 mitigation! • Fossil fuels are abundant and cheap • Renewable energy generally not mature enough to replace fossil fuels • Coal-fired power plants with CCS could provide low-carbon energy at competitive costs • Currently successfully employed in ‘pilot’ projects

  25. CCS: Carbon Capture • Both conventional and modern types of coal-fired power plants can be adapted for CCS • Conventional coal-fired power plant: • Burn coal in air (much like the old days) • Exhaust gas is ~15 % CO2 (rest is mostly nitrogen and water vapor) • Exhaust gas flows over chemicals that selectively absorb CO2 (‘amines’) • The amines are heated to ~150 ºC to give up the CO2 and produce a (nearly) pure CO2 gas that can be sequestered. • Modern coal-fired power plant: • Coal is burned with pure oxygen in a gasification chamber to produce hydrogen and CO2 • The CO2 is filtered out and the hydrogen is burned for electricity

  26. CCS: Sequestration • CO2 can be sequestered at ~1 km underground, here pressure is high enough to liquify CO2, which helps prevent it from leaking • Several options for sequestering CO2: • Depleted oil/gas reservoirs (can even be used to enhance oil/gas recovery – reduces costs) • Deep saline (brine) formations – these are porous media in which CO2 can be stored and dissolve in the salty water • Use for coal-bed methane recovery (one of those ‘unconventional’ fossil fuels) • Ocean floor (very controversial!)

  27. CCS: economics • CCS could become cost-effective with future carbon legislation

  28. Energy Decarbonization Tools:4. Biofuels • Initially hailed as a sustainable substitute for oil • Can help reduce oil imports and improve national security • In US, this is probably main motivation for recent push (“addicted to oil”, Bush’s 2006 State of the Union) • Two main kinds of biofuels: • First generation: Produced by converting sugar in corn, sugar beets, etc., into ethanol (alcohol) • Second generation: Produced through “cellulosic conversion” of biomass into sugar, then sugar into ethanol • Climate change impact of different biofuels is very different!

  29. Biofuels – First Generation • In US, mainly corn-based ethanol • Heavily subsidized by federal government to reduce oil dependence (~$1.90/gallon) • Effect on climate change is negative: • Energy used in production is comparable to energy content • Significant amounts of N2O (a potent GHG) can be produced through fertilizer use • Often, more carbon would be sequestered by letting crop land lie fallow • Raises food prices  Tropical deforestation, which releases more carbon than saved from fuel production over > 30-year period Source: Fargione et al., Science, 2008

  30. US 2nd generation biofuel US 1st generation biofuel Biofuels – Second Generation • Produced from plants containing cellulose • Cellulosic conversion to sugar is very difficult and expensive! (cows have 4 stomach compartments for a reason…) • Second generation biofuels are better for climate change: • Similar amount of carbon sequestered as fallow cropland • But, competition with food could still lead to tropical deforestation and net release of carbon!

  31. Biofuels – do they help or hurt? • In general, biofuels that compete with food will not contribute to mitigating climate change • Direct link between food demand/prices and tropical deforestation • Production of first generation biofuels (directly from food such as corn) is not a solution to climate change and should be avoided! • Production of second generation biofuels (from biomass) is only helpful if it doesn’t compete with food production (so not grown on cropland) • Second generation biofuels from marginal farmland or agricultural waste could play important role, but is currently not cost-effective • Could play an important role in mitigating transportation emissions if breakthroughs in cellulosic conversion are made

  32. Outline Lecture 2 • Lecture 2: Future energy use and climate change mitigation • ‘Business as usual’ • Why we need to act to prevent ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference’ in the climate system • ‘Wedges’ to mitigate climate change • Energy supply decarbonization ‘tools’ • Energy efficiency • Renewable energies • Carbon sequestration • Biofuels • Specific ‘wedges’ of mitigation • Externality: energy and water

  33. Where can we create ‘wedges’ in the energy system? • Power generation (40 %) • This is the ‘easy’ target because of availability of cost effective low-carbon options (wind, CCS) • Direct fuel use (36 %) • This can be ‘switched’ to low-carbon electricity • Transportation (24 %) • This is the tough nut to crack! • Currently no real feasible low carbon alternatives • Lot of infrastructure in place for fossil fuel-based transportation! ??? ???

  34. How to create ‘wedges’: Power Generation • Several options, each one wedge: • Increase efficiency of coal-fired power plants from 40 to 60 % ($) • Replace coal-fired with natural gas-fired power plants ($) • Double nuclear electricity to replace coal-fired power plants ($$) • Use CCS for low-carbon coal-fired power plants ($$) • Expand wind energy 30x to replace coal-fired power plants ($$) • Expand solar energy 700x to replace coal-fired power plants ($$$)

  35. How to create ‘wedges’: Direct Fuel Use • Several options, each one wedge: • Improve building insulation ($) • Replace natural gas heat with low-carbon hydrogen from wind/coal with CCS ($$$) • (and general switch to electricity heat instead of fuel heat)

  36. How to create ‘wedges’: Transportation • Several options, each one wedge: • Increase car efficiency from 30 to 60 mpg ($) • Compacter world with less travel  5,000 instead of 10,000 miles/vehicle ($) • Switch to low-carbon hydrogen ($$$) • Switch to sustainable biofuels  unlike corn ethanol, these must not compete with food production! ($$$)

  37. Outline Lecture 2 • Lecture 2: Future energy use and climate change mitigation • ‘Business as usual’ • Why we need to act to prevent ‘dangerous anthropogenic interference’ in the climate system • ‘Wedges’ to mitigate climate change • Energy supply decarbonization ‘tools’ • Energy efficiency • Renewable energies • Carbon sequestration • Biofuels • Specific ‘wedges’ of mitigation • Externality: energy and water

  38. Must address climate change without exacerbating freshwater shortage • Both energy and water are critical resources • Many areas already suffer water stress • note Africa, India, China, where greatest population growth is projected to occur • Projected to become worse with increasing population, pollution, and climate change • Dry areas are generally projected to become drier. • Must address energy challenge without exacerbating water scarcity

  39. So where is our fresh water used? • You can take many, many, very long showers for a pound of steak… • Greatly expanding biofuels from ethanol to substitute oil would probably be bad idea…

More Related