slide1 l.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Introduction Ozone Hole trends CCM model prediction of ozone hole Parametric model Controlling factors Model outline Pr

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 59

Introduction Ozone Hole trends CCM model prediction of ozone hole Parametric model Controlling factors Model outline Pr - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Recovery of the Antarctic ozone hole P. Newman 1 , E. Nash 1 , S. R. Kawa 1 , S. Montzka 2 , Susan Schauffler 3 , R. Stolarski 1 , S. Pawson 1 , A. Douglass 1 , J. E. Nielsen 1 , S. Frith 1 University College Dublin, Sept. 21, 2006. Introduction Ozone Hole trends

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Introduction Ozone Hole trends CCM model prediction of ozone hole Parametric model Controlling factors Model outline Pr' - lucas

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Recovery of the Antarctic ozone holeP. Newman1, E. Nash1, S. R. Kawa1, S. Montzka2,Susan Schauffler3, R. Stolarski1, S. Pawson1, A. Douglass1, J. E. Nielsen1, S. Frith1University College Dublin, Sept. 21, 2006


Ozone Hole trends

CCM model prediction of ozone hole

Parametric model

Controlling factors

Model outline

Predictions of Recovery

Estimating recovery


Climate Change and Recovery



why is understanding ozone hole recovery important
Why is understanding ozone hole recovery important?
  • The ozone hole is the poster child of atmospheric ozone depletion
  • Scientists staked their reputations on ozone depletion - international regulations were implemented. We need to carry our predictions through.
  • Severe ozone holes lead to acute UV events in mid-latitudes
  • Possible regulation changes could accelerate the phase out of ozone depleting chemicals.
  • The ozone hole is a fundamental example of mankind’s ability to alter our atmosphere and climate - forming a useful example on climate change policy
toms 1984

Extremely cold temperatures are found in the lower stratosphere in spring and fall



Extremely low values

Green-blue indicates low ozone values, while orange-red indicated high values


Strong jet stream (the polar vortex) acts to confine ozone losses over Antarctica

High values are normally found in the mid-latitudes

TOMS 1984

October 1984 TOMS total ozone

defining the hole
Defining the Hole
  • Ozone hole area is defined by the area coverage of ozone values less than 220 DU = 24.7 M km2
    • 220 DU located near strong gradient
    • 220 DU is lower than values observed prior to 1979
    • Values of 220 tend to appear in early September. TOMS doesn’t make measurements in polar night!
    • Values of 220 tend to disappear in late November
  • Ozone hole minimum is 94 DU

Antarctic Ozone Hole on Oct. 4, 1998

daily ozone hole area
Daily Ozone Hole Area

24.7 M km2 on

Oct. 4, 1998

Derive average size from an average

of daily values: Sep. 7-Oct. 13

sept 17 2006
Sept. 17, 2006

Ozone < 220 DU

Aura OMI

minimum ozone
Minimum Ozone

WMO Fig. 3-47

model predictions summary
Model Predictions Summary
  • WMO assessment (2004): “These models suggest that the minimum column ozone may have already occurred or should occur within the next decade, and that recovery to 1980 levels may be expected in the 2045 to 2055 period.”
  • CCM losses tend to be too small
    • All of the CCMs underestimate the ozone hole area.
    • In general, the CCMs overestimate the depth of the ozone hole.
  • PSC composition & phase are key to heterogeneous reaction rates
    • II - Crystaline water Ice ~ 188 K
    • Ia - Crystaline particles above frost point ~ 195 K
    • Ib - liquid particles above the frost point ~ 192 K
  • PSCs control de-nitrification and de-hydration, which influences ozone loss

Photo: Paul A. Newman - Jan. 14, 2003 - Southern Scandanavia

antarctic ozone hole theory






Antarctic ozone hole theory

Solomon et al. (1986), Wofsy and McElroy (1986), and Crutzen and Arnold (1986) suggest reactions on cloud particle surfaces as mechanism for activating Chlorine

Cl2 is easily photolyzed by UV & blue/green light

HNO3 is sequestered on PSC

polar ozone destruction

1. O3 + Cl ClO + O2

3. ClOOCl+h2 Cl+O2

3 O2

2. 2 ClO + M ClOOCl + M

Polar Ozone Destruction

2 O3

Only visible light (blue/green) needed for photolyzing ClOOCl

No oxygen atoms required

Net: 2O3 + h  3O2

chlorine and bromine
Chlorine and Bromine

NOZE 1 & 2 missions in 1986: High-concentrations of chlorine monoxide at low altitudes in the Antarctic spring stratosphere - diurnal-variations, R. Dezafra, M. Jaramillo, A. Parrish, P. Solomon, B. Connor, J. Barrett, Nature, 1987

AAOE mission in August-September 1987: observations inside the polar vortex show high ClO is related to a strong decrease of ozone over the course of the Antarctic spring: J. Anderson et al., JGR, 1989

Ozone (ppmv)

Latitude (˚S)

ozone hole area versus year
Ozone Hole Area Versus Year

Polar vortex ≈ 33 Million km2

ozone hole residual area vs t
Ozone Hole Residual Area Vs. T

If the temperature is 1 K below normal, then ozone hole’s area will be 1.1 Million km2 larger than normal.

See Newman and Nash, GRL, 2004

O3 residual area: 9/21-9/30

T: 9/11 - 9/20, 50 hPa, 55-75ºS

  • We have reasonably good estimates of temperatures over Antarctica from radiosondes and satellite temperature retrievals
  • We only have snapshots of Cl and Br over Antarctica
  • How can we estimate Cl and Br over Antarctica for all of our observed ozone holes?
ozone loss source chemicals
Ozone Loss Source Chemicals
  • Surface concentrations ~ 1998
  • Cl is much more abundant than Br
  • Br is about 50 times more effective at O3 destruction

From Ozone FAQ - see

atmospheric chlorine trends from noaa erl climate monitoring division

Production fully banned in US by Pres. Bush

Atmospheric Chlorine Trends from NOAA/ERL - Climate Monitoring Division

102 years



Steady growth of CFCs up to 1992

50 years



42 years

85 years


5 years

Updated Figure made by Dr. James Elkins from Trends of the Commonly Used Halons Below Published by Butler et al. [1998], All CFC-113 from Steve Montzka (flasks by GC/MS), and recent updates of all other gases from Geoff Dutton (in situ GC).

cfc 12 ccl 2 f 2 pathway to antarctica
CFC-12 (CCl2F2) pathway to Antarctica



Cl catalytically destroys O3



CFC-12 photolyzed in stratosphere by solar UV, releasing Cl

Cl reacts with CH4 or NO2 to form HCl or ClONO2



Altitude (km)

Pressure (hPa)

Carried into stratosphere in the tropics by slow rising circulation



HCl and ClONO2 react on the surfaces of PSCs



CFC-12 released in troposphere











ccm mean age of air sept
CCM mean age-of-air (Sept.)

GSFC GEOS-4 mean age-of-air derived from advected age tracer. Magenta line is the tropopause, white lines are zonal mean zonal wind

Grey lines schematically show mean flow.

ccm mean age of air sept34
CCM mean age-of-air (Sept.)

Air at a particular point in the stratosphere is a mixture of air parcels that have come together from a multitude of pathways with different times of transit. This “spectrum” of transit time forms an “age-spectrum” that has a mean value and a spectrum “width”

age spectra
Age Spectra

The spectrum is convolved with the surface observation time series to yield the stratospheric time series.

ccm mean age of air sept37



















CCM mean age-of-air (Sept.)
ccm mean age of air sept38







CCM mean age-of-air (Sept.)

If we know the mean age of air (), and we know the fractional release rate as a function of , then we can estimate the chlorine available from CFC-11 for ozone loss

cfc 11 break down
CFC-11 break down

Schauffler et al. (2003)

estimating halogen cl br levels over antarctica
Estimating halogen (Cl & Br) levels over Antarctica
  • Observations show that it takes about 5.5 years for air to get to the Antarctic stratosphere - tropospheric CFCs in January 2000 yield Antarctic stratospheric Cl in July 2005!
  • We use observed CFCs & mean age-of-air estimates to calculate fractional release rates as a fcn. of age
  • EESC = equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine

n= # Cl or Br atoms,f= release rate,  = chemical mixing ratio,  = scaling factor to account for Br efficiency for ozone loss


Observed total chlorine* (surface)

Estimated stratospheric chlorine

Parametric model of the ozone holeMethodfit ozone hole size to quadratic functions of EESC and temperature
ozone hole parametric model
Ozone Hole Parametric Model

Area is a function of Effective Equivalent Stratospheric chlorine (EESC) and temperature

EESC = 0.8 G(CCly) + G(CBry)

G = Age Spectrum (6 year mean age, 3 year width)

CCly and CBry from WMO (2003)

EESCmax = 3.642 ppbv

a0 = -69.5 million km2

a1 = 50.9 million km2/ppbv

a2 = -1.08 million km2/K

A = 0 for EESC = 1.817 ppbv

 = residual area

r = 0.971 (r2=.943)

ozone hole area vs year 2
Ozone Hole Area vs. Year (2)

Temperature effect is removed

ozone hole area vs year 3
Ozone Hole Area vs. Year (3)


Black line represents the fit of area to EESC

Area residual  = 1.8 M km2

Unexplained residual for 1992 ~ 3 m km2

ozone hole area vs year 4
Ozone Hole Area vs. Year (4)

Using WMO (2003) Cly and Bry projections, we use our fit to project the ozone hole area

add uncertainty to fits
Add uncertainty to fits
  • EESC: We assume mean age = 5.5 years and the spectrum width = 2.75 years = EESC0
    • Monte Carlo mean age (= 0.5 years) and width (= 0.5 years) to generate new EESC time series = EESC1
    • Add 80 pptv of “noise” to EESC1 = EESC2
  • Area: Use original area fit (A0) + added noise re-sampled from area residuals = A1
  • Refit new Area (A1) as a function of EESC2
  • Project forward using EESC1 for calculating new recovery dates
ozone hole area vs year 6
Ozone Hole Area vs. Year (6)
  • The ozone hole area peaked in 2001 from the area fit to EESC
  • The ozone hole area will remain large (and relatively unchanged for 20 years (1997-2017)
  • Area will start decreasing in approximately 2017
  • The area will have decreased 1- by 2018 and 2- by 2027
  • Based upon our boot-strap statistics, recovery will first be detected in 2024
  • The area will be zero in 2070
  • Are the chlorine and bromine levels over Antarctica well represented by using WMO (2003) and an age-spectrum for the 1979-2004 period?
  • How good is WMO (2003)? New revisions (A1) increased recovery to 2070 from 2068.
  • Is a 5.5 year mean age and a 2.75 width appropriate for the age spectrum?
  • How do we represent interannual variability in age, Cly and Bry estimates?
  • Will climate change impact H2O levels and the initial conditions for the ozone hole?
full recovery vs mean age of air
Full Recovery vs. mean age-of-air
  • The recovery dates are proportional to our estimate of the mean age-of-air inside the Antarctic vortex: Age sensitivity=9.0 yr/yr
  • Critical to improve our understanding of age in the vortex and to understand age variation in future climate scenarios
how will climate change impact the ozone hole
How will climate change impact the ozone hole?

-0.25 K/decade cooling

CMIP2 data from IPCC (2001)

No trend

  • Peak size 2011 (2004)
  • Area will start decreasing in approximately 2018 (2017)
  • The area will have decreased 1- by 2025(2024) and 2- by 2031 (2029)
  • Based upon our boot-strap statistics, recovery will first be detected in 2028 (2027)
  • The area will be zero in 2079 (2075)
  • magenta - no T-trend
  • The area of the ozone hole is well represented by T and Cl and Br - We can use this to predict future size and minimum values of Antarctic ozone.
  • Based upon our parametric model:
    • The ozone hole will remain large for a least another decade with no evidence of improvement
    • Actual decreases will begin in about 2017, but can not be detected until 2023
    • The full recovery will not occur until 2070
    • GHG change will have small impact on recovery
  • Recovery is strongly dependent on age-of-air and future CFC scenarios
  • Current coupled models are still inadequate for recovery predictions

Jan. 10, 2003 - local noon, Kiruna, Sweden