html5-img
1 / 68

Transport in Solids

Transport in Solids. Peter M Levy. Email: levy@nyu.edu Room 625 Meyer Phone:212-998-7737. Material I cover can be found in. General: Solid State Physics, N.W. Ashcroft and N.D. Mermin (Holt, Rinehardt and Winston, 1976) Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, S. Datta (Cambridge

luann
Download Presentation

Transport in Solids

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transport in Solids Peter M Levy Email: levy@nyu.edu Room 625 Meyer Phone:212-998-7737

  2. Material I cover can be found in General: Solid State Physics, N.W. Ashcroft and N.D. Mermin (Holt, Rinehardt and Winston, 1976) Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, S. Datta (Cambridge University Press, 1995). Transport Phenomena, H. Smith and H.H. Jensen ( Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989). J. Rammer and H. Smith, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 323 (1986). Ab-initio theories of electric transport in solid systems with reduced dimensions, P. Weinberger, Phys. Reports 377, 281-387 (2003).

  3. Electrical conduction in magnetic media How we got from 19th century concepts to applications in computer storage and memories. 1897- The electron is discovered by J.J. Thomson

  4. ~1900 Drude model of conductionbased on kinetic theory of gases {PV=RT}

  5. ~1928 Sommerfeld model of conduction in metals

  6. Phenomena

  7. While each atom scatters electrons, when they form a periodic array the atomic background only electrons from one state k to another with k+K. This is called Bragg scattering; it is responsible for dividing the continuous energy vs. momentum curve into bands.

  8. 1911 Superconductivity is discoveredby Kammerlingh-Onnes The resistance of metals increases with temperature; that’s sort of intuitive: the greater the thermal agitation the greater the scattering. What was completely unanticipated was the lose of all resistance at a finite temperature. When mercury was cooled to 4.18K above absolute zero it lost all resistance; once a current was started one could remove the battery and it would continue to flow as if there were no collisions any more. An understanding of this phenomenon was not fully enunciated till 1958 with the theory of Bardeen-Cooper and Schreiffer. A key ingredient in understanding superconductivity is the coupling of motion of the background to that of the electrons. While this is largely responsible for resistance when the two are not coupled, those electrons that are responsible for superconductivity are no longer scattered.

  9. Provides explanation for negligible contribution of conduction electrons to specific heat of metals.

  10. What distinguishes a metal from an insulator

  11. Intrinsic semiconductors The number of carriers depends on temperature; at T=0K there are none.

  12. Doping with donors and acceptorsmany more carriers at lower temperatures

  13. Transistor: a p-n junction

  14. Depletion layer at interface-transfer of charge across interface

  15. Effect of bias-voltage on depletion layer

  16. ~1955 the transistor; rectification action of p-n junction

  17. Magnetoresistance Lorentz force acting on trajectory of electron;longitudinal magnetoresistance (MR). A.D. Kent et al J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 13, R461 (2001)

  18. Anisotropic MR Role of spin-orbit coupling on electron scattering A.D. Kent et al J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 13, R461 (2001)

  19. Domainwalls

  20. References Spin transport: Transport properties of dilute alloys, I. Mertig, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 123-142 (1999). Spin Dependent Transport in Magnetic Nanostructures, edited by S. Maekawa and T. Shinjo ( Taylor and Francis, 2002).

  21. GMR: Giant Magnetoresistance in Magnetic Layered and Granular Materials, by P.M. Levy, in Solid State PhysicsVol. 47, eds. H. Ehrenreich and D. Turnbull (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994) pp. 367-462. Giant Magnetoresistance in Magnetic Multilayers, by A. Barthélémy, A.Fert and F. Petroff, Handbook of Ferromagnetic Materials, Vol.12, ed. K.H.J. Buschow (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999) Chap. 1. Perspectives of Giant Magnetoresistance, by E.Y. Tsymbal and D,G. Pettifor, in Solid State PhysicsVol. 56, eds. H. Ehrenreich and F. Spaepen (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001) pp. 113-237.

  22. CPP-MR: M.A.M. Gijs and G.E.W. Bauer, Adv. in Phys. 46, 285 (1997). J. Bass, W.P. Pratt and P.A. Schroeder, Comments Cond. Mater. Phys. 18, 223 (1998). J. Bass and W.P. Pratt Jr., J.Mag. Mag. Mater. 200, 274 (1999). Spin transfer: Brataas, G.E.W. Bauer and P. Kelly, Physics Reports 427, 157 (2006).

  23. Spintronics-control of current through spin of electron

  24. The two current model of conduction in ferromagnetic metals

  25. 1988 Giant magnetoresistance Albert Fert & Peter Grünberg Parallel configuration Antiparallel configuration Two current model in magnetic multilayers

  26. Data on GMR M.N. Baibich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2472 (1988).

  27. GMR in Multilayers and Spin-Valves Co95Fe5/Cu [110] multi-layer • GMR • metallic spacer between magnetic layers • current flows in-plane of layers H(kOe) [011] DR/R~110% at RT Field ~10,000 Oe Py/Co/Cu/Co/Py NiFe Co nanolayer Cu Co nanolayer NiFe FeMn spin-valve H(Oe) DR/R~8-17% at RT Field ~1 Oe NiFe + Co nanolayer S.S.P. Parkin

  28. Oscillations in GMR:Polycrystalline vs. Single Crystal Co/Cu Multilayers Polycrystalline S.S.P. Parkin et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2152 (1991) Single crystalline S.S.P. Parkin Sputter deposited on MgO(100), MgO(110) and Al2O3 (0001) substrates using Fe/Pt seed layers deposited at 500C and Co/Cu at ~40C

  29. Current in the plane (CIP)-MR vs Current perpendicular to the plane (CPP)-MR

  30. 1995 GMR heads From IBM website; 1.swf2.swf

  31. Tunneling-MR Two magnetic metallic electrodes separated by an insulator; transport controlled by tunneling phenomena not by characteristics of conduction in metallic electrodes

  32. 2000 magnetic tunnel junctions used in magnetic random access memory From IBM website; http://www.research.ibm. com/research/gmr.html

  33. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS VOLUME 84, 3149 (2000) Current-Driven Magnetization Reversal and Spin-Wave Excitations in CoCuCo Pillars J. A. Katine, F. J. Albert, and R. A. Buhrman School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 E. B. Myers and D. C. Ralph Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

  34. How can one rotate a magnetic layer with a spin polarized current? By spin torques: Slonczewski-1996 Berger -1996 Waintal et al-2000 Brataas et al-2000 By current induced interlayer coupling: Heide- 2001

  35. Current induced switching of magnetic layers by spin polarized currents can be divided in two parts: Creation of torque on background by the electric current, and reaction of background to torque. Latter epitomized by Landau-Lifschitz equation; micromagnetics Former is current focus article in PRL: Mechanisms of spin-polarized current-driven magnetization switching by S. Zhang, P.M. Levy and A. Fert. Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 236601 (2002). Extension of Valet-Fert to noncollinear multilayers

  36. Methodology

  37. To discuss transport two calculations are necessary: • Electronic structure, and • Transport equations; out of equilibrium collective electron • phenomena. • Structures • Metallic multilayers • Magnetic tunnel junctions • Insulating barriers • Semiconducting barriers • Half-metallic electrodes • Semiconducting electrodes different length scales

  38. Prepared by Carsten Heide

  39. Lexicon of transport parameters Spin independent transport

  40. Spin dependent transport parameters

  41. Ballistic transport:see S. Datta Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995). Critique of the “mantra” of Landauer’s formula; see M.P. Das and F. Green, cond-mat/0304573 v1 25Apr 2003.

More Related