1 / 8

802.11 Review of March 2013 Proposed Pars

802.11 Review of March 2013 Proposed Pars. Authors:. Date: 2013-03-18. Abstract. Review of 802 WG PARS submitted for review during the July 2013 Session. PARs under consideration. July 1x-1x, 2013, Geneva, Switzerland

lowri
Download Presentation

802.11 Review of March 2013 Proposed Pars

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 802.11 Review of March 2013 Proposed Pars Authors: • Date:2013-03-18 Jon Rosdahl, CSR Technology Inc.

  2. Abstract • Review of 802 WG PARS submitted for review during the July 2013 Session. Jon Rosdahl, CSR Technology Inc.

  3. PARs under consideration • July 1x-1x, 2013, Geneva, Switzerland • 802.1Qcc - amendment for Stream Reservation Protocol (SRP), PAR and 5C • 802.1Qcd - amendment for Application Virtual Local Area Networks (VLAN) Type, Length, Value (TLV), PAR and 5C • 802.3br - amendment for Specification and Management Parameters for Interspersing Express Traffic, PAR and 5C • 802.15.10 - recommended practice on Layer 2 Routing, PAR and 5C • P802.19.1 - PAR Extension Jon Rosdahl, CSR Technology Inc.

  4. 802.1Qcc • PAR • In general the PAR is written by and for a community already knowledgeable in 802.1Q. One of the purposes of a PAR is to advertise the start of a new project to a broad community. • 802.11 members can not read the PAR and determine the scope. • Configuration stream wording is confusing • What is the current stream limit. What will the new limit be? • What types of layer three support do you plan to offer • Do you plan to issue a press release if the project is approved. How would you describe the project in a press release? • 8.1 is empty. Could some of the 5C material be used to further explain the project? • 5C • Technical feasibility • What is the Avnu Alliance and what is its relationship to 802.1Q? • Did Avnu supply use cases or requirements that could be refernced/made available? • What does C mean? • What assumptions are being made of 802.11 and its ability to participate in SRP? Jon Rosdahl, CSR Technology Inc.

  5. 802.1Qcd • PAR • Does IETF provide any similar VLAN tag? • How does VLAN tag simplify mamnagemnt? • 5C • Slide 6 • Please define the scope of “end stations” or provide some examples. • The 5C alternately claims that Qcd will simplify network managemment and end station managem,ennt – which is it? Jon Rosdahl, CSR Technology Inc.

  6. 802.15.10 • PAR • Section 5.4 • What L3 mechanisms are to be considered? • Section 8.1 Clarify the relationship between 15.4e and 15.10. Are there any new functions being added by 15.10? Does 15.10 use only features previously defined by 15.4e? • Is 15.10 for use only with 15.4 based networks? • Should the project be called 802.15.10 or 802.15.4.1? • 5C Jon Rosdahl, CSR Technology Inc.

  7. 802.3br • PAR • Is there any dependency between 802.1Qbu and 802.3br? • Please explain what “interspersed express traffic” is. • 5C • Distict Identity (slide 5) What does close to zero delay on converged networks mean? Jon Rosdahl, CSR Technology Inc.

  8. 802.19.1 extension • PAR • Why is 802.11af not mentioned? • 5C Jon Rosdahl, CSR Technology Inc.

More Related