1 / 18

Industry Shipperless & Unregistered Working Group

Industry Shipperless & Unregistered Working Group. Wednesday 1 st February 2012. Agenda. Introduction Review ‘Terms of Reference’ document Previous minutes/actions Statistical Information Overall industry volume Age analysis/AQ values Targeted sites

love
Download Presentation

Industry Shipperless & Unregistered Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Industry Shipperless & Unregistered Working Group Wednesday 1st February 2012

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Review ‘Terms of Reference’ document • Previous minutes/actions • Statistical Information • Overall industry volume • Age analysis/AQ values • Targeted sites • Legitimate pot – The curious case of Dursley Sainsbury’s • Proactive data cleansing • Duplicate identification (Orphaned/PTS/SSP/No activity) • Discussion points • MOD 0410 • Fitting meters without advising Supplier • A.O.B.

  3. Terms of Reference – Review existing principles • Purpose and Objectives (A collective cross industry working group) • Collectively establish & execute activities to correct the current Unregistered/Shipperless datasets recorded within the central systems; • Identify the root causes & fix the process deficiencies; • Review the outcome of ‘Project Delta’ field visits & agree next steps, inclusive of Unregistered/Shipperless sites that are not recorded on central systems. • Scope • This working group has been established to address the 3 objectives utilising Licence, UNC and non-UNC instruments as appropriate • Composition • The working group has been designed to be an open Industry forum. It is the intention that representatives from Gas Distribution Networks and Suppliers as a minimum would be in attendance.

  4. Terms of Reference – Considerations • Industry change • Modification discussions & Workgroups • Potential duplication of decision making • Scope of influence • Continue with quarterly forum? • Change reporting frequency? • Consensus across Stakeholders

  5. Statistical Information

  6. Overall Industry volumes

  7. Overall Industry volumes: Age analysis

  8. Overall Industry volumes: AQ values

  9. Top 500 Legitimate pot: AQ breakdown

  10. The curious case of Dursley Sainsbury’s SAINSBURY’S Castle St, Dursley, Glouc’sGL11 4BS • MPR 9206457400… created 28th May 2009 • Requested/Current AQ… 301,344,000 • Store opened 17th March 2010 • Duplicate checks proved negative • January 2012… Sadly still Unconfirmed

  11. Targeted sites • To aid progression focus on specific ‘Legitimate’ categories • Highest AQ ~ Wider industry implications • Potential to re-categorise/remove? • Opportunity to stem rising volumes • Propose to issue ‘Legitimate’ pot for targeted analysis • How would industry like Xoserve to manage further examples • End-user letters? • Network Site Visits? • Issue priority Unconfirmed ‘pots’

  12. Proactive data cleansing - Orphaned • Report to identify potential duplicates from ‘Orphaned’ pot • Using ‘Fuzzy match’ principles • Matched MSN and address (in line with DUP procedure) • In total 6,409 MPR’s with asset attached • 147 ~ High confidence of duplicate (backed by manual checks) • 18 ~ Possible; raise internal DUP • 6244 ~ Not duplicates • Options to progress high confidence duplicates • Set to ‘EX’ • Request sample Site Visits

  13. Proactive data cleansing - PTS • Report to identify potential duplicates from ‘PTS’ (Shipperless sites derived from GSR process) • Using ‘Fuzzy match’ principles • Matched assumed MSN & address (in line with DUP procedure) • In total 2,120 MPR’s in population • 64 ~ High confidence of duplicate (backed by manual checks) • 9 ~ Possible; raise internal DUP • 2047 ~ Not duplicates • Options to progress high confidence duplicates • Set to ‘EX’ • Request sample Site Visits

  14. Proactive data cleansing - SSP • Report to identify potential duplicates from ‘SSP’ (Shipperless sites derived from GSR process) • Using ‘Fuzzy match’ principles • Matched assumed MSN & address (in line with DUP procedure) • In total 4,749 MPR’s in population • 106 ~ High confidence of duplicate (backed by manual checks) • 10 ~ Possible; raise internal DUP • 4,633 ~ Not duplicates • Options to progress high confidence duplicates • Set to ‘EX’ • Request sample Site Visits

  15. Proactive data cleansing – No activity • Report to identify potential duplicates from ‘No Activity’ pot • Using ‘Fuzzy match’ principles • Matched assumed MSN & address (in line with DUP procedure) • In total 1,408 MPR’s in population • 3 ~ High confidence of duplicate (backed by manual checks) • 3 ~ Possible; raise internal DUP • 1,402 ~ Not duplicates • Options to progress high confidence duplicates • Set to ‘EX’ • Request sample Site Visits

  16. Modification 0410 • Currently at draft proposal stage • New Connections where gas off-taken at Unregistered sites • Transporter responsibility • Where MPR’s created for non Shipper parties • Shipper responsibility • Where MPR requested by Shipper • Consideration to current processes • Impacts on reporting • Requirements to support change

  17. Fitting meters without advising Supplier • Anne Jackson

  18. AOB • Any other business…

More Related