50 likes | 148 Views
The journey unveils implicit changes in drylands often overlooked. Discover the risks like weakening governance to stewardship enhancement. Recognize the need for stronger network collaborations and the call for embracing resilience amidst multiple stressors.
E N D
Dryland Journey Summary Journey Findings Presented by Jonathan Davies
Change • Implicit (not explicit) in a lot of presentations and posters • Volatility/uncertainty of drylands not well reflected • Many profound changes in drylands, but not recognised for being part of broader dryland-specific development challenges (low investment, marginalisation, governance, science failures etc.)
Risk • Weakening governance – particularly highlighted through indigenous peoples discussions • Population growth, wealth creation and food demand – this is the principle risk to drylands • Demand for scale – pilots are over, but drylands were forgotten
Stewardship • Global Soil Protocol under the UNCCD • Dryland Initiative needs to make greater effort to mobilise the union for implementation of CCD • Stronger networking across all branches of the union – members, all commissions, all thematic programmes • Resource rights and governance are at the root of most dryland challenges. • A lot of emphasis now on community approaches • IUCN must play its role in scaling this up (esp. knowledge exchange and capacity building) • Must steer parks congress to address PA guidelines to better recognise ICCAs – opportunity with relation to Temperate Grasslands
Resilience • Defines drylands – but not reflected well in presentations seen here • Still a tendency to promote new technologies rather than restore/reform systems of governance • Resilience – why are we assuming it is a good thing? • Tension between ecosystem resilience and social resilience • Multiple stressors – don’t get fixated on climate change, even though that is where the money is