1 / 21

The Actuary as an Expert Witness

The Actuary as an Expert Witness. REG-44 Las Vegas, Nevada March 11-13, 2001. Introduction. Actuarial testimony in automobile insurance ratemaking Written testimony Oral testimony. Why Am I Here?. Whose witness are you? Which side has the burden of proof?

lotus
Download Presentation

The Actuary as an Expert Witness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Actuary as an Expert Witness REG-44 Las Vegas, Nevada March 11-13, 2001

  2. Introduction • Actuarial testimony in automobile insurance ratemaking • Written testimony • Oral testimony

  3. Why Am I Here? • Whose witness are you? • Which side has the burden of proof? • For what purpose are you testifying? • Are you the only actuarial expert? • If there is another expert “on your side,” have you reviewed that expert's testimony? • If there is an expert “on the other side,” do you know what that expert’s position is?

  4. Evidentiary Standards (1) • Admissibility of Expert Opinion Testimony Generally • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and its progeny

  5. Evidentiary Standards (2) • Meet your burden of proof • Standards of proof generally • beyond a reasonable doubt • clear and convincing evidence • a preponderance of the evidence - more likely than not • substantial evidence - “reasonable support in the evidence” • AIB v. Comm’r, 415 Mass. 455, 457 (1990); Aetna v. Comm’r, 408 Mass. 363, 378 (1990); MARB v. Comm’r, 384 Mass. 333, 337 (1981)

  6. The 3 C’s • Be Clear • Use short sentences • Be considerate of the stenographer • Be Confident • Know your facts • Be Convincing • Speak directly to the judge/hearing officer • Be polite always • Don’t insult the judge/hearing officer

  7. Tell the Truth • If you don’t know, don’t guess • Even an unintentional misstatement may cost you the case • What to do if you discover you’ve made an error

  8. Direct Examination vs. Cross Examination • Written vs. oral (in Massachusetts) • Non-leading (open-ended) questions vs. leading questions • Different goals

  9. Direct Examination (1) • Listen to the question! • Your lawyer should let YOU tell the story - choose your language and terminology carefully • Open-ended questions organized logically

  10. Direct Examination (2) • Be as simple and straightforward as possible - make the complicated easy to understand • Address and overcome any weakness in your position

  11. Cross Examination (1) • Listen to the question! • The opposing lawyer should try to limit your “wiggle room” - resist!

  12. Cross Examination (2) • Don’t volunteer anything • Don’t argue • Say all you need to say - there may not be another question • An offensive defense - turn your cross into offensive against their testimony when possible and appropriate

  13. Cross Examination (3) • It’s not over ‘til it’s over - some lawyers save strongest cross points for last • want to end on a strong note • witness is not as fresh • witness may be thinking they’re just about done • may be able to use other points gained throughout cross on this strongest point

  14. Exhibits • Shown to opposing counsel and judge/hearing officer • approaching the witness and judge • Foundation • Marking for identification • Moving into evidence

  15. Hypothetical Questions • Other side often will use to “sum up” • Be careful of assumptions underlying the hypothetical

  16. Prior Testimony • “Inconsistent” • Impeachment

  17. Common Objections in Administrative Settings (1) • Irrelevant/immaterial • No proper foundation • Leading the witness (on direct examination) • Repetitive (asked and answered)

  18. Common Objections in Administrative Settings (2) • Misstates evidence/misquotes witness • Confusing/misleading/ambiguous • Speculative • Compound question

  19. Common Objections in Administrative Settings (3) • Argumentative • Nonresponsive answer • Cross question is beyond the scope of direct examination • Improper impeachment

  20. Summary • You are a witness, not a lawyer, so don’t argue the case • Remember your goals in direct and cross • Be clear, confident and convincing • Be truthful • Be yourself

  21. The Actuary as an Expert Witness REG-44 Las Vegas, Nevada March 11-13, 2001

More Related