Measuring Community Wellbeing: A Global Movement for Better Communities and Stronger Democracy

1. Measuring community wellbeing:a global movement for better communities and stronger democracy Mike Salvaris Adjunct Professor RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia salvaris@optusnet.com.au ‘Thriving Neighbourhoods 2011’Conference St Kilda, 25-26 October 2011

2. Outline of presentation • The global movement to redefine progress • Issues of democracy and citizen engagement • Measuring community wellbeing: an overview • Community Indicators Victoria • Future directions: ACIN, ANDI, the Global Project

3. The growing global movement to redefine progress

4. Key issues • What is progress? (wellbeing? economic growth? sustainability, equity?) • Who should decide what progress is, for our nation or communities? • Why should citizens be engaged in that task? And how can they be best engaged? • Why should we measure our progress (national, community) and how best to?

6. The idea of progress No single idea has been more important than the Idea of Progress in Western civilization for three thousand years. (Nisbet, R. History of the Idea of Progress, 1980)

12. Statistics are ultimately about people and communities Statistics are people with the tears washed away Victor Sidel

13. The dominance of GDP as the world’s progress measure

16. A growing global movement: key drivers Anti-GDP movement UNDP, developing countries, HDI Women's movement (non-money eco contribution) Environmental movement Community renewal and community planning Triple Bottom Line Happiness research Evidence based policy

17. A growing global movement: projects Local initiatives: US: Community Indicators Consortium UK-Young Foundation France: FAIR, PEKEA Italy: Sbilanciamoci Latin America: Como Vamos, Porto Alegre Community Budget Australia: Tasmania Together, Community Indicators Victoria, CI Queensland New Zealand, Major Cities Indicators Project National initiatives: Canada (‘Canadian Index of Wellbeing’) Australia (‘Measures of Australia’s Progress’) Bhutan (‘Gross National Happiness’), France, Sarkozy (‘Stiglitz-Sen Commission on Measuring Progress’) US (‘Key National Indicators Act 2010’), Ireland, South Africa, Finland, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand etc. International initiatives: OECD Global Project ‘Measuring the Progress of Societies’; EU: Council of Europe ‘Beyond GDP’; International Association of Supreme Auditors; WEF Global Council “Benchmarking the progress of societies”;

19. Aims of the OECD Global Project Change culture, helping citizens and policy makers to pay attention to all dimensions of progress Develop new statistics in emerging domains Improve citizens’ numeracy, strengthening people’s capacity of understanding the reality in which they live Improve citizens’ knowledge, becoming more aware of risks and challenges of today world Improvenational policy making, through a better measurement of policy and societal outcomes Improve international policy making, through a world progress monitoring system, covering all countries Improvestatistical capacity in each and every country Strengthen democracy respecting historical and cultural differences Foster aglobal and open conversation about the state and the progress of the world … and thus IMPROVE WELFARE

20. Time to change the way we measure progress What we measure affects what we do; and if our measurements are flawed, decisions may be distorted. Choices between promoting GDP and protecting the environment may be false choices, once environmental degradation is appropriately included in our measurement of economic performance … The time is ripe for our measurement system to shift emphasis from measuring economic production to measuring people’s well-being. And measures of well-being should be put in a context of sustainability … (Stiglitz, J., A. Sen and J-P. Fitoussi. 2009. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Final Report, Paris pp. 7, 12, 18)

22. Issues of Democracy and Community Engagement

31. Measuring community wellbeing

32. Community wellbeing indicators in Australia

33. What are community wellbeing indicators? Community wellbeing indicators are statistical tools for translating broad community goals into clear, tangible and commonly understood outcomes and for assessing and communicating progress in achieving these goals Tools for democracy Tools for evidence based policy making Tools for reporting and evaluation Basis for new conversations about ‘community’, progress, wellbeing and sustainability?

34. Local community wellbeing indicators… Spotlight issues and trends important to local communities Include social, economic, environmental, cultural and governance trends and outcomes Measure community trends and outcomes – not local government performance Focus on a small number of headline wellbeing measures – not all local data

36. How do we develop measures of community wellbeing?

38. Community Indicators Victoria: Framework Five domains (75 indicators): Healthy, safe and inclusive communities Dynamic, resilient economies Sustainable built and natural environment Culturally rich and vibrant communities Democratic and engaged communities

40. Automated wellbeing reports

41. The CIV indicators are a powerful tool enabling Council to build on its current planning processes and to work together with local communities to identify needs and guide solutions. Anthony Schink, CEO, City of Ballarat The CIV website is an important new tool to help individuals, communities and governments to guide solutions and policy directions that enhance community wellbeing. Clare Hargreaves, Manager, Social Policy, Municipal Association of Victoria

42. The Australian National Development Index (ANDI)

47. ANDI: key features • Civil society initiative • Long term (5-10 year development phase) • Reporting (quarterly ‘GNWB’ Index, annual indices of key dimensions) • Community consultation, engagement and ownership • Close relationship with ABS • External partners: Canadian Index of Wellbeing, OECD • Strong collaborative research base (5+ universities) • Network and resource base, clearing house role • Education and communications emphasis, state of art website • Funding: majority non-government funding, ‘Funder alliance’