1 / 15

Electricity in California How did things go so wrong?

Electricity in California How did things go so wrong?. Robert J. Michaels Professor of Economics California State University, Fullerton rmichaels@fullerton.edu Orange County Business Council

lot
Download Presentation

Electricity in California How did things go so wrong?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electricity in CaliforniaHow did things go so wrong? Robert J. Michaels Professor of Economics California State University, Fullerton rmichaels@fullerton.edu Orange County Business Council Jan. 11, 2001

  2. The good [but expensive] old days • 1960s -- production costs and rates falling • 1970s -- energy crises, environmentalism, and Jerry Brown • 1980s -- passing through uneconomic plant and contract costs • 1990s -- California rates 150% of national average • 1993: PUC staff issues the “Yellow Book,” • blames regulation for problems

  3. The promise of a new system • 1970s: cost-cutting transactions by utilities • And deferral of in-state construction • 1980s: Independent power arises, wants freedom to trade • Small, fuel-efficient, clean gas-fired plants • 1992 federal legislation and transmission rights • Large customers want rights • Utilities claim “stranded costs” as obstacle

  4. Changing Nature of Industry Cost Characteristics $/MW 1930 1950 1970 1990 1980 MW 50 200 400 600 800 1,000 Source: Williams Company and TR Casten, “Whither Electric Generation? A Different View” Energy Daily, September 7, 2000.

  5. 1999 California Power Sources

  6. April 20, 1994: The Blue Book • Proposes comprehensive “direct access” • Utilities to open lines to user transactions • Phase-in to recover stranded costs • SCE proposes compulsory “Poolco” • Two years of conflicts and lobbying

  7. September 1996 -- A.B. 1890 • Freezes retail rates, 10% cut for small users • Utilities required to use short-term PX • All power sells day-ahead at highest bid • Utilities must divest some (not all) powerplants • Stranded costs recovered as difference between rates and PX prices, 2002 deadline • ISO to operate system, real-time markets • No precedents for PX and ISO markets • Switch from state to federal (FERC) regulation

  8. Markets begin --1998 to May 2000 • California energy prices fluctuate predictably • Move with short-term prices elsewhere in west • Allegations of market power • Prices in $30 - $80 / MW range at most times • Rules make entry of new sellers hard • PX sells 80% of power in state • Municipal utilities largely untouched by changes • SDG&E freeze ends mid-1999 • Required to pass through PX prices afterwards

  9. 2000 -- the endless summer • Short-term prices rise all over the west • Cal utilities’ energy costs above frozen rates • FERC cuts allowable ISO and PX prices • Duration of losses threatens insolvency • Non-Cal utilities buy only small amounts of power in short-term markets • Cal utilities can only buy short-term, can’t hedge • It’s what they wanted in 1996

  10. Why, and why now? • Summer weather, NW water situation • Rising fuel and emission permit costs • Calif demand far higher than expected • Calif in-state supply falling short • West-wide market equalizes prices • Did producers act monopolistically?

  11. 2001 -- Critical Times • Utilities at limits of ability to borrow • Up to $ 1 million / hour in new debt • What might bankruptcy mean? • FERC will not force producer refunds • Blames California for own situation • Has overriding interest in region, not state • Found no evidence of monopolization • Low likelihood of winning them in court • Utility solvency requires large rate hikes

  12. The State-of-the-State Speech • Proposals for state takeovers only conceal risks and losses • Proposals to keep power in-state probably illegal • Political uncertainty discourages new plants • No acknowledgement of hard choices that must be made immediately

More Related