1 / 24

Budget coherence

Budget coherence. Jim Brumby FAD Washington DC, Jan 17, 2003. Outline. What is coherence What are the major dimensions of coherent budgeting Where do we see coherence failures. Coherent budgeting. Consistency Comprehensiveness Substance over form

lorin
Download Presentation

Budget coherence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Budget coherence Jim Brumby FAD Washington DC, Jan 17, 2003

  2. Outline • What is coherence • What are the major dimensions of coherent budgeting • Where do we see coherence failures

  3. Coherent budgeting • Consistency • Comprehensiveness • Substance over form Orderly provision of public resources to public purposes through time

  4. Traditional view of budgeting • Interest is mainly (macro) economic • ‘Government’ as single entity • All sources of funds are fungible; all uses of funds must compete equally • Management of public indebtedness • Transaction costs and ‘institutions’ don’t or barely exist

  5. Dimensions • Macroeconomic stabilization • Intertemporal • Coverage • Financial • Managerial

  6. Coherence breakdowns • Vested interests ‘like’ special treatments • Deals with government ‘commitment’ problems • Hard for government to be credible at any point because of its future power • Needs devices to ‘tie its hands’

  7. Developing countries problems • Unrealistic planning and budgeting, resulting in • Cash rationing (cash box budgeting) • Informal systems (hidden budgeting) • Lack of credibility (repetitive budgeting and deferred budgeting)

  8. Developing countries • Special funds • Payment arrears • Low effective accountability • MTEFs with false accuracy and non-credible estimates Supermarket trolley budgeting

  9. Macroeconomic • Analysis of sectoral balances per Mundell-Fleming • Overall fiscal balance=revenues-expenditures • Govt Saving=current revenues-current expenditures • Spans all levels of government

  10. GFS/SNA • Government performs different functions from rest of economy • Measuring (not estimating/imputing) gross flows of payments to/from government (i.e. cash) • Economic and functional classification (COFOG) Statistical approach to support analysis

  11. Macro economic context • Steps to improve reliability or reduce costs of underachievement • Transparency: independent review; comparison; sensitivity analysis (15 OECD)

  12. Intertemporal issues • ‘Contracts’ exist which exceed annual focus • Large projects • Enduring commitments (entitlements) • Incentives to mislead • Implied commitments • Explicit liabilities • Implicit liabilities • Contingent liabilities

  13. Dealing with time • One year snapshot of cash very partial • From cash to accrual • From less to more information, especially on fiscal risks • ‘Commitment’ to higher quality information • From narrow to broad coverage • Development of IBC

  14. Intertemporal budget constraint • ‘comprehensive’ concept – tax gap for sustainability; generational accounting; CNW • CNW= RNW + PV(revenue-expenditure) • Sensitivity: Budget at risk models • Period

  15. More intertemporal coherence • 64% OECD countries provide some MT forward projection of activity • A few now provide LT projections – 50 years or so • 4 countries provide pre-election outlooks • Shift to accrual accounting • 8 now using some accrual; 5 committed to move to full accrual budget, and 3 some additional

  16. The practice - coverage • Numerous devices ‘test’ comprehensive coverage in space • Decentralization • External loans and grants • Extra budgetary funds • Autonomous agencies • Tax earmarking/user charges • Social security funds • QFAs • Two conflicting approaches for coverage: • Ownership & control versus public purpose

  17. IFAC – Ian Ball • GFS does not report on all the entities under the control of Government, and is therefore seriously deficient as an accountability instrument. To adopt GFS as the basis of reporting is to facilitate the manipulation of results through transactions with those entities which are under the Government’s control, but outside the reporting entity. The use of GFS as the primary reporting basis would hand to the Government on a plate the mechanisms which Enron had to strain and/or break the rules to achieve.

  18. Financial coherence • Traditionally: • All cash • Based on funds: • Trust funds • Consolidated funds • Based on legal authority • All input line item driven • Execution report

  19. Financial coherence • Migration to: • Cash flow statement • Operating statement • Balance sheet • IFAC standard for cash only A fully integrated set of accounts

  20. Performance coherence • Macro goals • Policy outcomes specified • Outputs contracted • Financial goals achieved: • Budget actually executed • Performance and budget incentives reinforce each other

  21. Outputs and outcomes • Migration from PB to formal contracting • Externally focused • Similar in nature • Controllable • Comprehensive • Measurable • Informative

  22. Output contracting • Quantity, quality, cost, timeliness • Production outputs (O’comesY;O’putsY) • Payment of benefits • Procedural outputs (N;Y) • Policy advice • Craft outputs (Y;N) • Policing • Coping outputs (N;N) • Education

  23. OECD results budgeting • 15 publish with budget for most programs • 6 for some • 7 for none • 11 in main budget document • 5 audited

  24. Conclusions • Coherence is key • Innovations in institutions • Coherence requires • Time • Capacity • Coherent advice?

More Related