Askaryan effect in salt: SLAC T460, June 2002. 4lb high-purity synthetic rock-salt bricks (density=2.07) – 6 tons of it. + some filler from local grocery store… Makes & contains the shower. T460 rock-salt target. Embedding 21 dual antennas (and lots of cable)
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
4lb high-purity synthetic rock-salt bricks (density=2.07) – 6 tons of it.
+ some filler from local grocery store…
Makes & contains the showerT460 rock-salt target
Bremsstrahlung beam from 28.5 GeV e – 6 tons of it.-Detector layout; EGS simulation
Beam exit point shown above – 6 tons of it.
good indicator of transverse size of shower! -- at 15 radiation lengths.Lateral distributions
Shows rise with frequency expected for Cherenkov – 6 tons of it.
Loss of coherence roll-off at ~5-10GHz also likelyAbsolute pulse field strength
Side antennae: horns & log-periodic
Verify Askaryan process: silica sand, SLAC T444, 2000 – 6 tons of it.
Identify radio-transparent natural salt structures 2001
Ground Penetrating Radar tests from 1970’s give strong indications
Hockley salt dome tests (Gorham et al. 2002) confirm La>250m
Extend accelerator results to rock salt 2002
SLAC T460: salt behaves as predicted!
Cosmic-ray testbed for antenna development/signal characterization 2002
In progress since 2003
Site studies and selection 2005-2006
Detector construction & deployment 2007-2010Roadmap to a large-scale salt detector