1 / 18

Presented by: Jumana Vasi, Ruby Pap, Emma Hutchinson & Steve Higgs NRE 517 April 8 th , 2002

Presented by: Jumana Vasi, Ruby Pap, Emma Hutchinson & Steve Higgs NRE 517 April 8 th , 2002. The Kenai River Watershed Project: Ecosystem Management In Alaska. __________________. Kenai River Watershed: The Place. Natural features: Over 37 fish species, 5 salmon species

longwell
Download Presentation

Presented by: Jumana Vasi, Ruby Pap, Emma Hutchinson & Steve Higgs NRE 517 April 8 th , 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presented by:Jumana Vasi, Ruby Pap, Emma Hutchinson & Steve HiggsNRE 517April 8th, 2002 The Kenai River Watershed Project: Ecosystem Management In Alaska __________________

  2. Kenai River Watershed: The Place Natural features: • Over 37 fish species, 5 salmon species • Other fuzzy, feathered, and giant creatures: brown bears, caribou, bald eagles, beluga whales The local economy: • Commercial & sport fisheries • Logging private/public forests • Recreational & tourism

  3. Ecosystem Stresses/Issues • Damage to streambanks due to sport-fishing • Trampling of sensitive riparian corridors • Increased non-point source water pollution • Residential development • Recreational parks • Urban/residential growth along river/wetlands • Incompatible development • High density recreational vehicle parks • Habitat conversion, degradation, fragmentation • Wetland filling/draining • Timber harvesting

  4. Kenai River Project Begins • 1993 – Local residents and Alaska FWS contacted TNC to request their assistance in restoring the Kenai Watershed area • 1996 – TNC Alaska organized a community forum and recommended forming a citizen-based group to protect the watershed, the economy and the quality of life valued by local residents. • 1997-The Kenai Watershed Forum was created to bring together all the stakeholders and interested parties

  5. Stakeholders • Landowners (in order of size of land owned): • Federal agencies: • USFWS – Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, • USFS – Chugach National Forest, USEPA • Private residential landowners • State of Alaska • Native-owned lands • Townships: City of Kenai, City of Soldotna, Town of Stirling, Town of Cooper Landing, Kenai Peninsula Borough • Commercial fishing industries • Other interested parties: • Alaska Conservation Foundation • Alaska Department of Fish and Game • Exxon Oilspill Trustee Council • Kachemak Heritage Land Trust • Kenai River Center • The Nature Conservancy • River Network

  6. The Kenai Watershed Forum Citizens working together for community vitality in a healthy watershed • Composed of community stakeholders, each with differing priorities: commercial, environmental, property ownership, natural resource use • Incorporated as a private, non-profit community organization • Initial funds provided by USEPA • Currently funded through individual and business membership, Federal, State, and Foundation grants as well as profits from the sale of the Kenai River Nature Guide.

  7. Initial Conservation Activities • TNC Produced a report for EPA and other stakeholders: • An ecological model of region analyzing watershed needs • Detailed land ownership maps • 1,000 person survey of watershed residents to assess conservation sentiment • Established a Kenai River Region office of the Kachemak Heritage Land Trust • Townships began implementing environmentally-sensitive riparian developments • Organized workshops and public meetings to create public understanding

  8. Additional Conservation Efforts Kenai River Festival • Organized and hosted by the Kenai Watershed Forum • Provides great opportunity to educate the public • Adopt-a-Stream • Goal: “To teach people to become stewards of their watersheds.” • Provides hands-on education for school children • “All Drains Lead to Kenai River” • High school student group stenciled signs on water drains to create public awareness

  9. Conservation Accomplishments • Created Killey River Brown Bear Preserve, 1997 • Trained over 75 volunteer quality monitors • Instituted monitoring of macro invertebrates (aquatic insects as indicator species) through collaboration with Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game • Acquired trail easements to provide public access across private property • Removed Salt Pile which was contaminating Soldotna Creek

  10. EM Assessment Five key elements of an ecosystem management approach: • Ecologically-defined project focus • Complexity • Explicit definition of biological/social goals • Collaborative decision making • Adaptive management

  11. Ecologically Defined Borders • Project is watershed focused • Kenai Watershed Forum • Importance of interconnected ecosystem recognized by participants • Stakeholders still focus on their main interests • e.g.-commercial fisheries focused on fish and habitat

  12. Complexity • Signs point to yes, but no management plans to date • Different permitting agencies housed together in Kenai River Center • Emphasis on monitoring/data collection to better understand the needs of salmon • Watershed scale project indicates recognition of complexity

  13. Explicit Definition of Goals • KWF mission statement: “Citizens working together for community vitality in a healthy watershed.” • Long term goals of KWF: • Maintain the health of the Kenai River Watershed • Promote Responsible Development • Ensure Quality of Life for Future Generations • Seek Solutions to Local Issues • Enhance and Expand Learning Opportunities • Improve Understanding of the Watershed

  14. Collaboration • Parties involved explicitly state that collaboration is important. • In practice, much collaboration appears to be more talk than action. • Exceptions: • Water quality monitoring – 14 groups involved. • TNC and KWF have also been active in attempts to involve community stakeholders. • Funding from govt agencies for education and community outreach work of KWF, as well as stream bank restoration.

  15. Adaptive Management • Not clear that there is an actual ecosystem management plan in place yet, which leaves little role for adaptive management. • Still collecting baseline data on water quality, fish populations etc, which will prove helpful in future adaptive management.

  16. Summary/Future Prospects • Stakeholders on board to a degree, but no apparent consensus as to appropriate actions. • No explicit and coordinated management plan across multiple stakeholders. • Greater attempts are needed to reach agreement on what types of actions are required to prevent further degradation of he Kenai River.

  17. Resources Used for Assessment • Various EMI Analyses. • Newsletters of KWF. • Telephone discussion with KWF representative. • Web Resources, including: • TNC’s website on the Kenai River. • AK Dept of Fish and Game Kenai River Overview. • EPA website on Kenai River.

More Related