610 likes | 732 Views
MSP Crime Lab. Impact of New Technologies ”FOM” Stands For “Fantastically Organized Magic”, Right?. Carl M. Selavka, Ph.D., D-ABC Director. Massachusetts State Police Crime Laboratory Sudbury, Massachusetts. Disclaimers.
E N D
Impact of New Technologies”FOM” Stands For “Fantastically Organized Magic”, Right? Carl M. Selavka, Ph.D., D-ABC Director Massachusetts State Police Crime Laboratory Sudbury, Massachusetts
Disclaimers The opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official positions of the:
Disclaimed Agencies Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety Department of State Police Crime Laboratory System
Disclaimed Agencies NCST&L (Participants, Attendees, Even Sleeping Parties)
Additional Disclaimers The author does not purport to provide accurate, reasonable, intelligent or timely advice. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.
Presentation Summary • The Scientific Process • A Unique Forensic Overlay • Analytical Figures of Merit • If Only Our FOMs Could Be Applied to Pristine Samples
Doing The Job In Deep Water
The Scientific Process • New Tools & Advancing Technologies • Applying Technology in Unique Ways
So Many Opportunities Competing For Attention
Meetings / Presentations • Too Many, Too Big • Example: ACS – 700 Symposia, • Governance Meetings, Socials • Concurrent = Fragmented • Plenary = Too Broad • Smaller = Better BUT Fewer Folks Scientific Dissemination
Publications • Too Many Journals & Articles • Example: Analytical Chemistry – Microfluidics (1 JUL – 31 AUG 05) • 4 Issues = (52 + 50 + 49 + 50 =) 201 Articles • Microfluidics = (5 + 4 + 4 + 11 =) 24 Articles • J. of Forensic Sciences = 1 Article Scientific Dissemination
Meetings / Presentations • Publications • Scientific Funding • Federal RDT&E = ($344MM[NSF] + $230MM[DoD] + $207MM[DoE] =) $781MM for FFY05 • Forensic RDT&E = (~$100MM[NIJ] + ~$40MM[FBI] + ~$2MM[ATF] + ~$2MM[DEA] =) $~144MM for FFY05 • Real RDT&E is Far Less Scientific Dissemination
64 Current RDT&Es • Biological (32) • Chemical (19 [6 Joint Bio/Chem]) • Physical (18) Research Partnership Program
64 Current RDT&Es • “Open” or “Closed” RDT&E and Dissemination? • How Are They Proposed? • How Are They Selected?? • “Probative” Information Outcomes? Research Partnership Program
64 Current RDT&Es • “Open” or “Closed” RDT&E and Dissemination? • How Are They Proposed? • How Are They Selected?? • “Probative” Information Outcomes? • Where are Data Saved? • Availability for Review? Research Partnership Program
The Scientific Process • New Tools & Advancing Technologies • Applying Technology in Unique Ways • Alpha- and Beta-Tests to Prove Concepts • Hypothesis Testing Made Real
Hypotheses Tests Alpha & Beta
Airborne Spectral Photometric Environmental Collection Technology • Alpha / Beta Applications • Ethanol & Methanol Test Plumes • 10-11 AUG 05 “EQ Recovery Resources” Fire Los Alamos’ ASPECT Dr. Vahid Majidi – 9.12.05
Los Alamos’ ASPECT • How Would ASPECT Apply to Liability & Culpability at the “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt” Level? • “Preponderance of the Evidence”?
The Scientific Process • New Tools & Advancing Technologies • Applying Technology in Unique Ways • Alpha- and Beta-Tests to Prove Concepts • Hypothesis Testing Made Real • Full- and Mini-Validation Requirements • Learning More & More About Less & Less
Sensitivity • How Much “Analyte” is Present? Analytical Figures of Merit
But I’m a GC/MS! I Can Detect Picograms of Analytes of Interest!
Sensitivity • How Much “Analyte” is Present? • Selectivity • Identification “Uniqueness” Analytical Figures of Merit
Sensitivity • How Much “Analyte” is Present? • Selectivity • Identification “Uniqueness” • Response Range • “Limits of Linearity” Analytical Figures of Merit
Interferences • How “Bad” are They? • How Many Analytes? • From Common Matrices? Analytical Figures of Merit
Our Forensic Analytical Tools Are Bulletproof
DNA is All You Need! The Crime Lab CSI what’s wrong w/ this picture? DNA
Legal System Justice System
“DNA” = Probative? 1966 2002