1 / 13

Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee

Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee. Assessment Update September 2012. Maturing Assessment Process. 1. Student learning outcomes established Develop consistent definition of outcomes, criteria for assessment, apply criteria to student work

loman
Download Presentation

Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee Assessment Update September 2012

  2. Maturing Assessment Process 1 Student learning outcomes established Develop consistent definition of outcomes, criteria for assessment, apply criteria to student work Promote curriculum development that is aligned with outcomes Make assessment a value-added effort 4 2 3

  3. Common Pitfalls • Compliance with external demands • Triggering resistance of faculty • Gathering data no one will use • Letting administrators do it • Making the process too complicated

  4. The Grading Process Student Criteria by Evaluated by Feedback to Performance

  5. Simplest Form of Direct Assessment Student Criteria by Evaluated by Feedback to Performance

  6. Expanding the Players Student Criteria by Evaluated by Feedback to Performance

  7. Drake Curriculum Data • Critical Thinking • Review of student work samples (2007, 2008, 2010) • Collegiate Learning Assessment (2008-2010) • Foundations of Learning Assessment/Drake Student Survey • National Survey of Student Engagement

  8. % of FYS Papers Receiving a Median Rating of “Less than satisfactory”

  9. Select results from Drake 2010-2011 Collegiate Learning Assessment

  10. Drake Assessment Projects 2009 2011 2008 2007 2010 2006 2009 Higher Learning Commission Academy for the Assessment of Student Learning Critical Thinking Assessment of Student Work Samples Collegiate Learning Assessment – Critical Thinking and Written Communication Teagle Campus Learning Project – Engaged Citizenship

  11. Developing Systematic Assessment 2012 2011 2010 2014 2013 2009 Faculty Senate endorses Drake Curriculum outcomes Review of Critical Thinking Results and Faculty Development Drake Curriculum Analysis and Planning committee Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee designated Associate Provost for Curriculum and Assessment, Director of Academic Assessment positions created

  12. Proposed Drake Curriculum AssessmentTimeline 2015 2017 2014 2013 2016 2012 2009 Communicate Critical Thinking Assessment Results Pilot Info. Literacy Assessment Pilot Assessment of Student Work Samples Using Criteria EC, Global & Multicultural, Quantitative EC, Global & Multicultural, Quantitative Values and Ethics, Artistic, Physical Sci. Values and Ethics, Artistic, Physical Sci. Life Science, Historical Consc. Life Science, Historical Consc. Meet with AOI Faculty to Develop Criteria –

More Related