1 / 51

WEDPAC/EDPAC 10.30.13

CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR’S OFFICE. WEDPAC/EDPAC 10.30.13. Agenda. 10am – 1:00pm Welcome & Introductions Policy Discussion Context Research Findings Facilitated Discussion & Working Lunch 1pm - 2:00pm Update on Doing What MATTERS for Jobs & Economy

lolita
Download Presentation

WEDPAC/EDPAC 10.30.13

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR’S OFFICE WEDPAC/EDPAC 10.30.13

  2. Agenda 10am – 1:00pm • Welcome & Introductions • Policy Discussion • Context • Research Findings • Facilitated Discussion & Working Lunch 1pm - 2:00pm • Update on Doing What MATTERS for Jobs & Economy • Interactive Map, Onboarding & Self-Help Resources • Key Talent ‘Meet and Greet’ • Jose Anaya, Sector Navigator, Advance Manufacturing • Steve Glyer & Lynn Shaw, LA/OC Regional Consortia • 2013-14 EWD Expenditure Plan • Consent Items • Next Meeting: January 22, 2014, 10AM-2PM • Public Comments California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  3. Policy DiscussionContext: California Economic Summit ‘Workforce Action Team’Van Ton-Quinlivan Amy Wallace, California Workforce Investment Board“Workforce Investments: State Strategies to Preserve Higher-Cost Career Education Programs in Community and Technical Colleges” ReportJodi Lewis, Institute for Higher Education Leadership & PolicyFacilitated Discussion & Working LunchFacilitators: Catherine Swenson, Elaine Gaertner and Denise Brosseau California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  4. What are our Jobs & Economy Goals? Jobs & Economy Goals: • Supply in-demand skills for employers • Create relevant pathways and stackable credentials • Get Californians into open jobs • Promote student success California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students 4

  5. California’s reality: many regional economies • San Diego/Imperial • ----- • Los Angeles • Orange County • ----- • East Bay • North Bay • SF/Mid Peninsula • Silicon Valley • Santa Cruz/Monterey • ----- • Inland Empire/Desert • ----- • Greater Sacramento • Northern Inland CA • Northern Coastal CA • ----- • South Central • ----- • Central • Mother Lode California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  6. Administrative Fixes Empower Regions Rethink Funding • Phase 1: Doing What MATTERS for Jobs & Economy Framework • Target incentive investment (EWD, SB70, Perkins 1B) • Sector • Region • Technical Assistance • Braided RFA • Common accountability metrics • Phase 2: Moving the Needle • Phase 3: Scaling Excellence California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  7. Continuum for increasing system’s responsiveness to workforce needs Administrative Fixes Empower Regions Rethink Funding High Medium IMPACT Medium DIFFICULTY Low Medium High California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  8. Cost Creates Disincentive to Offer CTE10-year trend in CTE portfolio of community colleges (as % of Full Time Equivalent Students) California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  9. California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  10. The Convergence - Feedback from Regional Forums - Community college field feedback • California State Workforce Plan Unmet Regional Need for In-Demand and High-Growth CTE California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  11. Workforce Investments: State Strategies to Preserve Higher-Cost Career Education Programs in Community and Technical Colleges Nancy Shulock Jodi Lewis Connie Tan Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy Sacramento State University

  12. The California Context • Enrollment funding = one rate for all programs Source: National Community College Cost & Productivity Project, National Higher Education Benchmarking Institute

  13. Scope of Study • Examine how 20 states are using finance strategies to preserve high-cost CTE/workforce programs • Limited to the use of state general funds • Limited to postsecondary institutions

  14. CTE in Other States • Thoughtful prioritization of CTE • A larger portion of associate degrees (includes Associate of Applied Science)

  15. Strategies that May Preserve CTE/Workforce Programs

  16. Separate Technical Systems/Institutions • 11 out of 20 states have “technical” colleges in 3 types of governance structures, e.g., • “Technical” Colleges within a comprehensive system • Washington SCTCS • Louisiana CTCS • Technical college systems • Technical College System of Georgia • Texas State Technical College System • Free-standing technical colleges not in a system • Kansas • Ohio

  17. Differential Funding • 13 of 20 states differentiate funding by discipline • Assign costs to discipline categories • Incorporate cost differentials in final allocations • Usually 3-6 categories • Higher-cost programs funded 2-3 times higher • “Fair” • Equity in terms of student access to quality programs

  18. Performance Funding • 14 out of 20 states have approved PF • Treats high and low cost programs the same • Rewards completions of degrees and certificates • Can incentivize variety of workforce outcomes • Some metrics include job placement, wages, high-need completions, and industry certifications

  19. Differential Tuition • 11 out of the 20 states • Some use it broadly, some selectively • Some marginally higher, some much higher

  20. Examples of Differential Tuition (by Program)

  21. Course Fees • 17 of the 20 states charge course fees • Fees cover lab operation and equipment, supplies, specialized training, assistants • Examples: • Indiana’s Ivy Tech college course fees range from $10 to $50 for automotive courses, to $300 for principles of advanced manufacturing • At Blue Mountain CC in Oregon, fees range from $80 for music courses, to $150 lab fees in welding

  22. Conclusions • There is much to learn from other states • Most states are very thoughtful about the issue of finance • Most celebrate the CTE mission without hesitation, and without detriment to the transfer mission • These 5 strategies are adaptable

  23. Implications for California • Strategy 1: “Technical colleges” • Messaging is important • Strategy 2: Differential funding • A different take on equity • Strategy 3: Performance funding • Flexible applications to incentivize workforce outcomes • Strategy 4: Differential tuition • Could apply very selectively • Strategy 5: Course fees • Could loosen statutory restrictions

  24. Clarification Questions? • Contact Information: ihelp@csus.edu • IHELP Publications: http://www.csus.edu/ihelp

  25. Strategies that May Preserve CTE/Workforce Programs Poll & Discuss

  26. The Courageous Conversation - Feedback from Regional Forums - Community college field feedback • California State Workforce Plan Unmet Regional Need for In-Demand and High-Growth CTE Is there a path forward? California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  27. 1st Group of Internal & External Stakeholders California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  28. 1st Group of Internal & External Stakeholders California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  29. Is There a Path Forward? Shared ownership The Issue The Process The Filters The Strawman Vet & Refine • Deliberation of Options • Cost: • Start up • Do • Time: • Buy-in • Do • Difficulty: • Start up • On-going • Impact & side effects to • CA’s community college system: • Primary • Secondary • Tertiary How likely will this strategy fix the funding barriers to offering in-demand, high growth and more costly CTE courses? Path forward: Explore differential (or enhanced) funding Is there a “shared investment” concept How to meet regional need for in-demand and high-growth CTE? IHELP research on 20 states Structured discussion technique Initial mix of external and internal stakeholders California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  30. Differential Funding: A Closer Look at Models Being Used in Other States

  31. Outcomes of DF • A college with more students enrolled in higher cost programs (e.g., CTE) would receive, on average, more funding per student than other colleges • Overall funding is more closely representative of the actual costs to serve students • Equal opportunity for students to access programs • Equal opportunity for colleges to offer the programs their regions need

  32. One Concept: Many Approaches • 13 of the 20 states we studied use DF • Disciplines assigned to cost categories • Funding rates assigned to categories • Costs based on data from the state’s colleges or national cost studies • 3 main approaches: • Rate based on student/faculty ratio • Rate based on total cost • FTES weighting

  33. Arkansas Source: Arkansas Department of Higher Education

  34. Illinois Source: Illinois Community College Board

  35. Nebraska • Courses are weighted, and colleges receive funding based on FTES enrollment in courses • 1.0 weighting for academic transfer courses • 1.5 weighting for technical courses that don’t require expensive equipment • 2.0 weighting for technical courses requiring expensive equipment (e.g. welding and nursing)

  36. Other Examples

  37. Facilitated Discussion QuestionsRound #1 Design A: Tiered Funding – Based on cost Design B: Weighted Funding – 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, etc. Design C: CTE Equipment Enhancement Funds Address: - Pros & Cons of each design - What must occur for this design to be successful? California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  38. Facilitated Discussion QuestionsRound #2 Design A: Tiered Funding – Based on cost Design B: Weighted Funding – 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, etc. Design C: CTE Equipment Enhancement Funds Address: - What constituency concerns must be considered or addressed? California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  39. Next Steps Facilitators will provide feedback to California Economic Summit(CAEconomy.org) on designs Other designs? California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  40. Update Interactive Map, Onboarding & Self-Help ResourcesKey Talent ‘Meet and Greet’EWD Budget California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  41. doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  42. doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  43. doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  44. Download banner link to Interactive Map: http://www.doingwhatmatters.cccco.edu/CommunicationToolKit.aspx#share California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  45. California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  46. California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  47. California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  48. Meet & Greet of Key Talents • Jose Anaya • Advanced Manufacturing • Director & Sector Navigator • Steve Glyer & Lynn Shaw • LA/OC Regional Consortia • Chair & Vice Chair California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  49. 2014-15 Proposed Expenditure PlanSB-1042 Economic & Workforce Development (EWD) Program Recommendation: Request restoration this categorical to $46.3M* Approve 2014-15 expenditure plan for $22.9M of that pot * (from 2002) California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

  50. ConsentNext Meeting: January 22th, 10AM-2PMPublic Comments California Community Colleges – Chancellor’s Office | 112 Colleges | 72 Districts | 2.6 Million Students

More Related