1 / 11

Bren Haase CPRA Board Meeting September 18, 2013

Consistency with the 2012 Coastal Master Plan : Guidelines for Restoration Projects Receiving State Funding. Bren Haase CPRA Board Meeting September 18, 2013. committed to our coast. committed to our coast. Why do we need another document?.

liza
Download Presentation

Bren Haase CPRA Board Meeting September 18, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Consistency with the 2012 Coastal Master Plan: Guidelines for Restoration Projects Receiving State Funding Bren Haase CPRA Board Meeting September 18, 2013 committed to our coast committed to our coast

  2. Why do we need another document? • Guidelines developed to help agencies and stakeholders with project development • Clarification of 2012 MP relative to projects of various types • Largely for CWPPRA but applicable to all projects receiving State funding

  3. What information does the document contain? • General descriptions of how the MP defines various restoration techniques • Where certain restoration techniques are applicable • Take-home message: please consult with us during project development

  4. What if I have questions about the document? • CWPPRA Task Force meeting – October 18, 2013 in New Orleans • LCP meeting in October/November in Baton Rouge • CWPPRA Technical Committee meeting – December 12, 2013 in Baton Rouge • Contact us directly

  5. Barrier Island/Headland Restoration • Creation/restoration of dunes, beaches & back barrier marshes • Utilizes dredged material and vegetative plantings • Hard structures are not primary project features

  6. Hydrologic Restoration • Restoring natural hydrologic patterns • Introduction of freshwater to reduce salinity • Prevention of saltwater intrusion • 15 projects identified in MP • In some cases alternative approaches may be considered

  7. Marsh Creation • Dredging and placement of sediment for direct creation of marsh • Over 150,000 ac identified in MP • Large, contiguous areas for greatest impact • MP focused on particular areas most resilient in analyses

  8. Oyster Barrier Reefs • Protect shorelines & provide habitat • Optimal locations still being identified • If conditions suitable, may replace traditional shoreline protection

  9. Ridge Restoration • Reestablish historic ridges • Provide habitat diversity & storm protection • Techniques still being developed

  10. Bank Stabilization • Placement of earthen material to stabilize bays, lakes, bayous, and navigation channels • For navigation channels, can comprise no more than 25% of project cost

  11. Shoreline Protection • Utilization of rock or hard structures to stabilize bays, lakes, bayous, and navigation channels • For navigation channels, can comprise no more than 25% of project cost

More Related