slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Knowing the Desires of Potential Sex Partners: A Slice of Mating Intelligence Glenn Geher State University of New York PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Knowing the Desires of Potential Sex Partners: A Slice of Mating Intelligence Glenn Geher State University of New York

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 57

Knowing the Desires of Potential Sex Partners: A Slice of Mating Intelligence Glenn Geher State University of New York - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 99 Views
  • Uploaded on

Knowing the Desires of Potential Sex Partners: A Slice of Mating Intelligence Glenn Geher State University of New York at New Paltz. A Brief History of Ideas . Mating Intelligence:  Sex, Relationships, and the Mind's Reproductive System Glenn Geher Geoffrey Miller.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Knowing the Desires of Potential Sex Partners: A Slice of Mating Intelligence Glenn Geher State University of New York' - liv


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
Knowing the Desires of Potential Sex Partners: A Slice of Mating IntelligenceGlenn GeherState University of New York at New Paltz
slide6
Mating Intelligence: Sex, Relationships, and the Mind's Reproductive SystemGlenn Geher Geoffrey Miller
slide7

Should Mating Psychology and Intelligence be Linked?How reasonable is the integration of mating and intelligence in the minds of scientists?

slide8
Analysis of articles in Intelligence for content tied to mating:Only 3 (0.8%) of 811 articles dealt with mating at all.
slide10

Analysis of articles in Evolution and Human Behavior for content tied to intelligence:Only 1 (0.3%) of 311 articles dealt with intelligence at all.

slide12

Analysis of articles in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships for content tied to intelligence:Only 2 (0.2%) of 939 articles dealt with intelligence at all.

slide14
In a SciSearch conducted for our book, of all 51,477,995 records, only 121 associated ‘mating’ and ‘intelligence.’
is a scholarly marriage between mating and intelligence sheer madness
Is a scholarly marriage between ‘mating’ and ‘intelligence’ sheer madness?#!?*!&!!

... not necessarily ...

slide19
As of September 19, 2006, The Mating Mind was ranked 9,797 (of over a million) on Amazon’s list of sales.

It was first published in 2000.

slide20
... compared with Glenn’s first book, Measuring Emotional Intelligence (2004), which ranks (on September 19, 2006) 999,106 in sales ...

... but back to the main ideas of this talk ...

... ouch!!!

slide21
The Mating Mind’sprovocative thesis:Perhaps human intelligence evolved primarily as a Sexually Selected Fitness Indicator …
why do some people hold incredible intellectual abilities that seem totally unrelated to survival
Why do some people hold incredible intellectual abilities that seem totally unrelated to survival?

Such as the ability to generate complex mathematical formulas to represent the physical world ...

msnbc news services 8 10 p m et july 10 2006
MSNBC News Services - 8:10 p.m. ET July 10, 2006:

“New letters shed light on Einstein’s love life …Einstein admitted he spent time with six other women while married”

slide25

What is Mating Intelligence?Miller’s answer: All aspects of human intelligence that were primarily designed for courtship purposes (roughly: all indices of creative intelligence with no clear survival value)

slide26

Miller’s conceptualization proposes that all intelligence is mating intelligence, on one hand – but his link between such intelligence and mating is decidedly indirect ...

slide27

But what about all the cognitive abilities that relate directly to human mating? Cross-Sex Mind-Reading Detecting Infidelity Assessing One’s Own Mate-Value Assessing Value of Potential MatesStrategic Flexibility in the Mating Market

a model of mating intelligence geher miller in press geher camargo o rourke in press
A Model of Mating Intelligence (Geher & Miller, in press; Geher, Camargo, & O’Rourke, in press)

Cognitive Mating Mechanisms

Mental Fitness Displays

Mating Success

a study of mating relevant cross sex mind reading
A Study of Mating-Relevant Cross-Sex Mind-Reading

How well do you know the desires of potential mates?

Are there systematic biases in mind-reading that are relatively intelligent?

emotional intelligence a model for studying mating intelligence
Emotional Intelligence: A Model for Studying Mating Intelligence

The Ability-Based Method for Studying Emotional Intelligence (Mayer & Geher, 1996)

operationalizing mating intelligence
Operationalizing Mating Intelligence
  • The degree to which participants can accurately guess which personal ads were rated as most attractive to members of the opposite sex
  • The degree to which participants’ errors in judging desires of the opposite-sex are adaptive
participants
Participants

Heterosexual Young Adults (Males: 152; Females: 329)

Materials

  • Index of General Intelligence (Army Alpha Vocabulary Test):
  • Sample item: Plenary:
  • Complete – Candid – Culpable – Cloying
  • 2. Indices of both Long-Term and Short-Term Mating Intelligence
short term mating intelligence male example
Short-Term Mating Intelligence (Male Example)

A: I love sex, generally, and … BLEEPED … in particular. No strings, no reciprocation necessary (although I wouldn’t be adverse to it!). You call the shots as much or as little as you wish. I’ve explored the Kinky.

B: I grow more humble but no less passionate about life every waking day. I laugh at myself, care about a lot, and strive to transform the ordinary into the extraordinary. I’m pretty simple, but have many talents: play several instruments, and I’m a decent gardener.

C: I fully recognize that succeeding means drawing on multiple talents, the best that everyone has to offer—so it seems with relationships. I enjoy many of life’s fine refinements, but I also realize that the best things in life are free.

the task at hand
The Task at Hand

To guess which of these three ads was chosen by most women as the most attractive for a short-term, sexual relationship.

4 Total Indices were computed in this study:

but does accurate correspond to intelligent
But … Does “Accurate” Correspond to “Intelligent?”

Not Necessarily ... Haselton & Buss (2000) – Error Management Theory

Males tend to overestimate sexual interest on the part of females

(The “I think she likes me that way” Bias)

Females tend to be Commitment Skeptics

(The “all men are pigs” Bias)

error management effects in the current study
Error Management Effects in the Current Study

All ads were rated by two independent judges in terms of presence of sexual content (categorically defined as present or not)

Sample Male Short-Term Item coded as having sexual content:

I love sex, generally, and … BLEEP … in particular...

___________________________________________________

Sample Female Short-Term Item coded as having sexual content:

I am searching for a fling of epic proportions, someone to caress my face as we kiss and who will write me love notes and leave them under my door—but will not get upset with me if I decide to kiss another man. Human beings are not meant to be paired for life,like lobsters.

defining male error management
Defining Male Error Management
  • Instances in which:
  • Male overall guessing was significantly off
  • Errors were such that males tended to overestimate degree to which females would choose sexually charged item
summary of male results
Summary of Male Results

Long-Term Judgments – Accurate overall – did not overestimate degree to which females were interested in sexual items

Short-Term Judgments – 5 of 10 items had one or more sexual ads – IN EACH CASE (5 of 5), males overestimated the degree to which females chose the sexually charged ad

defining female error management
Defining Female Error Management
  • Instances in which:
  • Female overall guessing was significantly off
  • Errors were such that sexually charged items were overestimated
summary of female results
Summary of Female Results

Long-Term Judgments – 5 of 10 items had one or more sexual ads – IN EACH CASE (5 of 5), females overestimated the degree to which males chose the sexually charged ad

Short-Term Judgments – 4 of 10 items had one or more sexual ads – IN 3 of 4 cases, females overestimated the degree to which males chose the sexually charged ad

Evidence for a ‘Men are Always Pigs’ bias?

is either accuracy or adaptive mind reading g loaded
Is Either Accuracy or AdaptiveMind-Reading g-Loaded?

Not for Females: Neither accuracy nor commitment-skepticism-bias was associated with vocabulary scores.

Maybe for Males???

correlations between iq and indices of accuracy and adaptive bias for males
Correlations between IQ and Indices of Accuracy and Adaptive Bias (for Males)

IQ____________

Accuracy in Long-Term Mating Judgments .06

Accuracy in Short-Term Mating Judgments .13

Overestimating Sexual Qualities (LT) .05

Overestimating Sexual Qualities (ST) .30*1

____________________________________________________N = 127 for all; *p < .05; 1significantly predictive of IQ after controlling for other predictors in standard regression. 

(F(4, 123) = 3.21, p < .05; R2 = .10)

implications
Implications

Sex Differences

Males are more accurate overall (consistent with findings from Bromley & Camargo (in prep.); DeBacker, Braeckman, & Farinpour, in press)

males rarely are better than females at social intelligence tasks
Males Rarely are Better than Females at Social Intelligence Tasks ...

Female superiority has been demonstrated in:

● Emotional intelligence (Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 1999)

● Social Intelligence (Connellana, Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright,

Batkia, Jag, & Ahluwaliab, 2000)

● Interpersonal Intelligence (Rammstedt, Thomas H. Rammsayer, 1999)

● Nonverbal abilities (Nowicki, 1994)

● Decoding in Communication (Noller, 1986)

two hypothesized effects may account for this sex difference
Two hypothesized effects may account for this sex difference

A. Heterosexual men may have more motivation to be accurate given the notoriously discriminating nature of the objects of their desire.

B. Given the reputation of males in the mating game, women may be wisest to employ a simple “all he wants is sex” heuristic.

(Commitment Skepticism may pay in the long-run)

the future of mating intelligence research
The Future of Mating Intelligence Research

1. How g-loaded are facets of mating intelligence?

1A. are courtship-display components more g-loaded than mating mechanisms?

2. Is our model of mating intelligence factorially valid?

3. Are mating mechanisms more designed for accuracy or adaptive bias (Fletcher & Simpson, 2000)?

4. Are the elements of mating intelligence predictive of mating success (Camargo, in progress)?

slide53

5. Would the the cross-sex mind-reading abilities documented in this study transfer to effectiveness in choosing the correct bachelor or bachelorette on The Dating Game?

slide54

Will the Mating Intelligence construct live up to its introduction in this presentation as the best thing since sliced bread?

We’ll have to wait and see!

acknowledgements
Acknowledgements

Thanks to my wonderful research assistants from SUNY New Paltz:

Eli Boyle, Mike Camargo, Michelle Coombs, Elisabeth Dewispelaere, Jason Diffenderfer, Warren Greig, Kelly Fairweather, Rachel Fetters, Kimona Hanson, Krystle Hearns, John Johnson, Jill Lavallee, Justin Lee, Heather Mangione, Nilerisha Mollette, Regina Musicaro, Uzoma Ugonabo, Erica White.

and to others who ve provided input and or guidance
... and to others who’ve provided input and/or guidance:

Alice Andrews, David Buss, Kathy Geher, Scott Barry Kaufman, Jack Mayer, Geoffrey Miller, Kaja Perina – and all the contributors to our book(coming soon to a bookshelf near you!).

For more information on my research, see: glenngeher.com

... and thanks for listening!