1 / 58

MI Large Aperture Quad (WQB) Project Part 2 – Installation & Operation

MI Large Aperture Quad (WQB) Project Part 2 – Installation & Operation. Beams-doc #2479. AD Credits. Mechanical Support: L. Valerio, L. Nobrega, M. Albertus and the installation group Electrical Support: L. Bartelson, D. Wolff

lindley
Download Presentation

MI Large Aperture Quad (WQB) Project Part 2 – Installation & Operation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MI Large Aperture Quad (WQB) ProjectPart 2 – Installation & Operation Beams-doc #2479

  2. AD Credits • Mechanical Support: L. Valerio, L. Nobrega, M. Albertus and the installation group • Electrical Support: L. Bartelson, D. Wolff • Instrumentation:J. Fitzgerald, J. Crisp, R. Webber, M. Wendt, M. Olson • ES&H: D. White • Survey: T. Sager and C. Wilson and their group • MI: I. Kourbanis, B. Brown, D. Capista, M. Yang • Other Depts: B. Hendricks, D. Johnson, F. Ostiguy, P. Prieto, R. Andrews • Funded by the Proton Plan. AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  3. Celebration of Completion of WQBs AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  4. Scope of the WQB Project • To design, fabricate and bench-test 9 WQBs • To design, fabricate and bench-test 9 EXWA BPMs • To install 7 WQBs and 7 EXWA BPMs during the 2006 shutdown (the rest for spares) • To install 7 trim coil power supplies • To commission the WQBs and new BPMs AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  5. Location of WQBs Q101 Q222 Q620 Q608 Q222 Q522 Q321 Q402 AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  6. WQB, New BPM and the Old Quads AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  7. IQE wide BPM to be replaced IQE wide BPM to be replaced IQE wide BPM to be replaced IQE wide BPM to be replaced AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  8. IQG wide BPM to be replaced LAM IQB normal BPM to be replaced IQB normal BPM to be replaced AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  9. De-magnetize Cone Welding (L. Valerio) • Lessons from LEP (CERN) and DESY3 (DESY) in early ‘90s • All transition pieces were heat treated before installation • Before heat treatment: μ(weld) = 1.10 ~ 1.15 • After heat treatment: μ(weld) < 1.01 AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  10. BPM 101 (EXWA 01, WQB 001) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  11. BPM 222 (EXWA 07, WQB 007) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  12. BPM 321 (EXWA 08, WQB 006) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  13. BPM 402 (EXWA 04, WQB 004) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  14. BPM 522 (EXWA 02, WQB 003) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  15. BPM 608 (EXWA 05, WQB 005) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  16. BPM 620 (EXWA 06, WQB 002) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  17. Electron Probe downstream from Q521 (IQE) Electron probe AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  18. WQB Field Quality Requirements • Large good field region: ± 2” (an increase of ±10 mm) • Small tracking error throughout the cycle: integrated field error w.r.t. IQB < 10 units (0.1%) Estimate of lattice perturbation AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  19. Relative Strength Difference between WQB and IQB Due to stronger hysteresis Due to higher saturation AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  20. WQB Hysteresis (upramp) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  21. IQB310 Hysteresis (upramp) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  22. Hysteresis Difference between WQB and IQB AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  23. Relative Strength Difference between WQB and IQB Including Hysteresis Effect (reset at 150A) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  24. Trim Current with & w/o Hysteresis Effect AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  25. Trim Current Anomaly (M. Tartaglia) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  26. Required Trim Current Setting Including Hysteresis and Anomaly Effects AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  27. Trim Coil & Power Supply (L. Bartelson) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  28. WQB Trim Current Table AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  29. WQB Trim Current Plot AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  30. EXWA BPM (L. Valerio, J. Fitzgerald) • Electrode ID = 5.625” • Extended angle = 60 • Installation specs: • Offset (relative to the quad center) < 5 mils (0.13 mm) • Roll < 1 (17 mrad) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  31. New BPM Requirements • Each new EXWA BPM measures both H and V. • Need new scaling to translate decibels to mm. • Need new offset table for database. • Horizontal beam position: pos = BPM reading + bpm_offset – survey_offset + orbit_offset – electrical_offset • Vertical beam position: pos = BPM reading + bpm_offset + survey_offset – electrical_offset AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  32. New Scaling 1. Analytic: (Chou, ANL/APS/IN/ACCPHY/89-3, 1989) A = constant R = pickup radius = 0.5 x 5.625” = 71.4375 mm x = difference / sum = [10^(A/20) – 10^(B/20)] / [10^(A/20) + 10^(B/20)] 2. Webber’s empirical 5th order polynomial (beams-doc #2280):

  33. Fitting to Raw Data in beams-doc #2007 Horizontal AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  34. Fitting to Raw Data in beams-doc #2007 Vertical AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  35. Hendricks Offset Table • Established 8 years ago in 1998 • survey_offset from Thornton Murphy(missing: 522, 523, 602-608, 619, 620) • bpm_offset and electrical_offset from Jim Crisp • orbit_offset from Dave Johnson

  36. New survey_offset (T. Sager) • Offset of the BPM mechanical center relative to the WQB center • Sign convention: • Horizontal: + pointing inward (namely, facing the proton direction, the left-hand-side is positive) • Vertical: + pointing upward • Roll: + indicating clockwise roll relative to proton direction AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  37. New bpm_offset (J. Fitzgerald) • Offset between the BPM mechanical and electrical center • Calculated using Fitzgerald’s raw data in #2007 • Sign convention: • Horizontal: + pointing outward (namely, facing the proton direction, the right-hand-side is positive) • Vertical: + pointing upward AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  38. New electrical_offset (R. Webber) • Offset from cables and other electronics • All long cables were measured and documented in beams-doc #2288. • Other electronics should have no contribution: • Upstairs new electronics are calibrated to zero gain difference • Combining box and the short cables are believed to have negligible contribution • Correction is done by multiplying A signal by the respective values in this listing

  39. Lattice Measurement • 1-bump - Closed Orbit Displacement from a single dipole kick: • 3-bump ratio: Tune: (x) = 26.42, (y) = 25.44 @ 8.889 GeV/c: B = 29.65 T-m Steering magnet strength (T-m/A): x = 0.007157, y = 0.003166

  40. Beta Function Measurement Change the jth steeringmagnet’s current by Ij and measure closed orbit change xjat the jth BPM: Tune: (x) = 26.42, (y) = 25.44 @ 8.889 GeV/c: B = 29.65 T-m Steering magnet strength (T-m/A): x = 0.007157, y = 0.003166 Measured closed orbit matrix diagonal element (m/A)

  41. 3-Bump: Prediction vs. Measurement

  42. Reference Closed Orbit (H) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  43. Reference Closed Orbit (V) AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  44. Reference Closed Orbit at WQBs BPM H402 (EXWA04) Calibrated Error between Raw Data and Polynomial Fit

  45. 1-Bump Difference Orbit: V101 – 0.25 A AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  46. 1-Bump Difference Orbit: V101 – 0.5 A AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  47. 1-Bump: Prediction vs. Measurement (I > 0)

  48. While 3-bump measurements were in agreement with the lattice model, 1-bump results were less satisfactory. • A plausible explanation is the cancellation of errors when three CODs are summed up for 3-bump. In other words, 1-bump is more sensitive to errors. • Large discrepancy observed at HP620 needs further investigation. AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

  49. 1-Bump: Prediction vs. Measurement (I < 0)

  50. AD/TD Seminar, Nov 2, 2006

More Related