60 likes | 210 Views
Medicaid Integrity Program. … and other issues. The Medicaid Integrity Program. Managed by CMS – not OIG The Medicaid Integrity Group David Frank, Director – former prosecutor Support not supplant state efforts – however, is expected to put a lot of pressure on states to perform
E N D
Medicaid Integrity Program … and other issues
The Medicaid Integrity Program • Managed by CMS – not OIG • The Medicaid Integrity Group • David Frank, Director – former prosecutor • Support not supplant state efforts – however, is expected to put a lot of pressure on states to perform • Three divisions: • Medicaid Integrity Contracting: procurement and oversight of contractors • Fraud, Research and Detection: data-mining • Field Operations: offices in Chicago and 4 other states • Special support to states
The Medicaid Integrity Program • Three sets of contractors form based of program • Review MIC (Medicaid Integrity Contractors) – data mining • Audit MICs – field and desk audits – work with DOJ and OIG to make sure not duplicating or interfering • Not contingency based contracts • FFS claims and then cost reports; next managed care audits • Identify but do not collect overpayments • Do NOT identify underpayments – SEE HANDOUT • Education MICs: state and providers; Medicaid Institute for states run conjointly by the DOJ and CMS
The Medicaid Integrity Program • Issues: • Contractors must learn on their own • Most audits will be desk audits • Requests will come on the contractors letterhead – may end up with a CMS cover letter but not yet – WATCH for these requests • In some cases identifying consumer only by Medicaid # • No limits on numbers of records that can be requested – they will not pay for copies • Illinois has a very short window for appeals • They will not be posting audits
New Federal Compliance Issues • New York OMIG: work plan, required compliance programs – setting new benchmarks • Quality of Care: • Medical Services: off-label usage; under 14; drug-seeking parents; cocktails, etc. • Board of Directors • Quality and Compliance and Risk Management and UR – no silos • IMD: not settled; Georgia advice remains best but not necessarily workable • Family-based interventions – engagement and outcomes