a validity study of the washington circle continuity of care performance measure n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
A validity study of the Washington Circle continuity of care performance measure PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
A validity study of the Washington Circle continuity of care performance measure

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 23

A validity study of the Washington Circle continuity of care performance measure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 705 Views
  • Uploaded on

A validity study of the Washington Circle continuity of care performance measure. Mark D. Godley Bryan R. Garner Rodney R. Funk Lora L. Passetti Susan H. Godley Chestnut Health Systems Bloomington, IL 2008 Research Society on Alcoholism Conference Washington, D.C. Acknowledgement.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'A validity study of the Washington Circle continuity of care performance measure' - libitha


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
a validity study of the washington circle continuity of care performance measure
A validity study of the Washington Circle continuity of care performance measure

Mark D. Godley

Bryan R. Garner

Rodney R. Funk

Lora L. Passetti

Susan H. Godley

Chestnut Health Systems

Bloomington, IL

2008 Research Society on Alcoholism Conference

Washington, D.C.

acknowledgement
Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2 R01-AA010368)

Dr.Margaret Mattson, Project Official

Dr. Peter Delany, Past Project Official

what is the washington circle
What is the Washington Circle?
  • Formed in 1998 by the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, the Washington Circle (WC) is a multi-disciplinary group of providers, researchers, managed care representatives, and public policy representatives.
  • Goals of the WC were to:
    • Develop and pilot test performance measures for substance abuse treatment programs
    • Promote adoption of these measures by public and private stakeholders
what are the washington circle performance measures
What are the Washington Circle Performance Measures?
  • Identification – number of individuals with a substance abuse or dependence diagnosis who received a substance abuse treatment service during the year among those who were eligible for services
  • Initiation – number of individuals with an outpatient index service (i.e., first treatment service preceded by a 60 day service-free period) during the year who received a second treatment service (other than detoxification or crisis service) within 14 days after the index outpatient service
  • Engagement – number of individuals with an outpatient index service during the year who received two additional services (other than detoxification or crisis service) within 30 days after initiation.
washington circle continuity of care performance measure
Washington Circle Continuity of Care Performance Measure

Continuity of care after…

  • Assessment Service
  • Detoxification
  • Short-term Residential
  • Long-term Residential
  • Inpatient

Continuity of Care is defined as the number of individuals with an additional service within 14 days after discharge from the previous service.

Source: Garnick, Lee, Horgan, & Acevedo (2007)

current research on the relationship between washington circle performance measures and outcomes
Current Research on the Relationship between Washington Circle Performance Measures and Outcomes
  • Harris, Humphreys, & Finney (2006)
    • Used data from 5,723 patients who had received substance abuse treatment from one of 110 Veterans Affairs programs.
    • Found higher rates of initiation were significantly related to greater improvements in reports of drug use (but not alcohol use).
    • Neither identification nor engagement was significantly related to improvements in either alcohol or drug use.
  • Garnick et al., (2007)
    • Used data from 5,169 outpatient clients included in the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (ODMHSAS) database.
    • Although initiation alone was not significantly associated with being arrested or incarcerations, clients who initiated and engaged were significantly less likely to be arrested or incarcerated in the following year.
study goals
Study Goals
  • Overall Goal: Conduct a validity test of the Washington Circle performance measure for Continuity of Care
  • Subgoals are to test whether:
    • Assertive Continuing Care (ACC) approaches improve compliance with the WC Continuity of Care measure regardless of whether they fail to successfully complete residential treatment;
    • Continuity of Care improves abstinence outcomes regardless of residential discharge type.
why study continuity of care
Why study continuity of care?
  • Like many illnesses, alcohol or other drug dependence is characterized by periods of remission and relapse (McLellan et al., 2000; Scott et al., 2005)
  • 60-70% of youth relapse in first 90 days after res. tx. (Brown et al., 1989; Godley et al., 2002)
  • Dennis et al., (2004) found that two thirds of youth treated in the CYT outpatient study moved in and out of recovery during the post-treatment study phase.
  • McKay (2005) reports benefit from extended interventions that provide care consistent with patient need.
continuing care following residential treatment for adolescents in illinois
Continuing Care Following Residential Treatment for Adolescents in Illinois

2000

Source: 2000 Statewide DARTs

why do so many patients fail to initiate continuing care
Why do so many patients fail to initiate continuing care?
  • May never get a referral if ASA/AD discharge type
  • Referral to another provider organization is “hit or miss”
  • Even transferring to another counselor within agency can be a problem.
  • Low Motivation/Treatment Fatigue - ready to be finished
  • Logistical/financial disincentives
  • Providers view it as the patients’ responsibility
53 have unfavorable discharges adolescents
53% Have Unfavorable Discharges - Adolescents

Source: Data received through August 4, 2004 from 23 States (CA, CO, GA, HI, IA, IL, KS, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MT, NE, NJ, OH, OK, RI, SC, TX, UT, WY) as reported in Office of Applied Studies (OAS; 2005). Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS): 2002. Discharges from Substance Abuse Treatment Services, DASIS Series: S-25, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 04-3967, Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Retrieved from http://wwwdasis.samhsa.gov/teds02/2002_teds_rpt_d.pdf .

who links to continuing care

Planned / transfer

within agency

Planned /Referred to

other agency

Unplanned Discharge

Who Links to Continuing Care?

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

Percent of Clients Linked

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Days from Residential Discharge

Source: CSAT ART Grantees Wilcoxon (Gehen) statistic (df=2)=79.83, p < .001.

assertive continuing care experiments
Assertive Continuing Care Experiments

Samples: 183 adolescents in Study 1 and 342 in Study 2 meeting DSM IV dependence on alcohol, marijuana or other drug; meets ASAM Level 3 placement criteria, residentialstay of 7+ days, returning to target counties, not a ward of state.

Instruments: Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN);

BAC and Urine tests for Cannabis and Cocaine; Collateral Interviews

Design: Random Assignment to either UCC or different ACC conditions. Active CC phase was 90 days after residential discharge

Follow-up: Over 90% of all participants received a follow up interview at 3, 6, and 9 months after residential treatment

features of assertive conditions
Features of Assertive Conditions
  • Meet once with client before res. discharge
  • Clinician is responsible for initiating CoC within 14 days of discharge.
  • Different conditions rec’d either A-CRA (Godley et al., 2001), CM (Petry, 2000), or A-CRA+CM
  • Sessions usually in the community (home/school)
  • Clinician helps patients comply with or obtain needed services
  • Limited transportation if needed to access referral resources, job interviews, etc.
effect of coc compliance on days of abstinence
Effect of CoC Compliance on Days of Abstinence

Alcohol

Marijuana

F = 17.10, p < .001, d=.44

F = 10.74, p < .001, d=.35

continuity of care by completion status condition
Continuity of Care by Completion Status & Condition

Residential Completers

Residential Non-Completers

2= 6.51, p < .01, d=.31

Nearly

Doubled

2= 17.71, p < .001, d=.59

percent of days abstinent from alcohol by completion status

23 of these 25 (93%) adolescents received CoC more than 14 days after discharge

6 of these 27 (22%) adolescents received CoC more than 14 days after discharge

Percent of Days Abstinent from Alcoholby Completion Status

UCC

ACC

Interaction for Completion by CoC

F = 5.90, p < .05, f-index=.14

N=25

N=50

N=134

N=89

N=62

N=27

N=22

N=40

Main Effect for CoC

F = 5.18, p < .05, d=.42

percent of days abstinent from marijuana by completion status
Percent of Days Abstinent from Marijuanaby Completion Status

UCC

ACC

Interaction for Completion by CoC

F = 3.19, p =.075, f-index=.11

N=27

N=22

N=40

N=134

N=25

N=89

N=50

N=62

Main Effect for CoC

F = 4.11, p < .05, d=.36

conclusions
Conclusions
  • Support for the WC CoC performance measure was found
  • Continuity of Care was significantly higher among adolescents assigned to ACC, regardless of residential treatment completion status.
  • Continuity of Care was found to be significantly associated with higher rates of abstinence from both Alcohol and Marijuana.
  • Future research on continuing care should include patients who do not successfully complete treatment.
study limitations
Study Limitations
  • The outcome data is based on self-report
  • Continuity of Care (CoC) within 14 days was imputed for a sub-sample of the UCC condition,
  • The sample is from two midwestern treatment sites, predominantly caucasian males, limiting generalizability
future research directions
Future Research Directions
  • Additional research is necessary to determine the clinical significance of these findings.
  • Additional validity studies are necessary, especially to test whether CoC is robust even if the 14 day standard is not met.
  • Similar research with adults is needed.
  • What patient subgroups do not seem to need it (i.e., they do fine w/out CoC)?
  • What patient subgroups appear to need CoC but do not benefit from it?
for more information
For More Information

To Download this presentation, go to:

www.chestnut.org/LI/Posters/index.html

Mark D. Godley, Ph.D.

Chestnut Health Systems

720 W. Chestnut St.

Bloomington, IL 61704

309.827.6026 ext.3401

mgodley@chestnut.org