“NET” NEUTRALITY
Download
1 / 24

“NET” NEUTRALITY Presentation for Kennesaw State University Michael J. Coles College of Business November 7, 2010 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 118 Views
  • Uploaded on

“NET” NEUTRALITY Presentation for Kennesaw State University Michael J. Coles College of Business November 7, 2010. Walt Sapronov Sapronov & Associates, P.C. 400 Northridge Road, Suite 515 Atlanta, Georgia 30350 Telephone: 770-399-9100 Facsimile: 770-395-0505

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '“NET” NEUTRALITY Presentation for Kennesaw State University Michael J. Coles College of Business November 7, 2010' - liam


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

“NET” NEUTRALITYPresentation forKennesaw State University Michael J. Coles College of Business November 7, 2010

Walt Sapronov

Sapronov & Associates, P.C.

400 Northridge Road, Suite 515

Atlanta, Georgia 30350

Telephone: 770-399-9100

Facsimile: 770-395-0505

Email: [email protected]


Contents
Contents

  • Overview

  • Net Neutrality Basics

  • FCC Authority

  • Origins of the Comcast Decision

  • D.C. Circuit Court Reversal

  • FCC “Third Way” Proposal

  • Net Neutrality By Other Means

  • Future Developments

  • Final Thoughts


Overview
Overview

Historically:

  • Federal Communications Commission (FCC)

    • Has asserted jurisdiction over:

      • Telecommunications

      • Wireless

      • Cable

    • BUT NOT OVER:

      • Information Services

    • What about Internet?


Overview1
Overview

  • Internet Content (the “Cloud”)

    • Clearly an unregulated information service

  • Internet Access (the “Pipes”)

    • Classification not so clear

    • Cable, DSL, Wireless

      • Are all regulated services?

      • Provided by regulated cable and telcos

      • But when combined with Internet Content?

    • They Create an Information Service

      • (U.S. Supreme Court “Brand X” Decision)


Current internet regulation title i
Current Internet Regulation (Title I)

Portal

Cloud

Computer processing

Access component

Pipe

Title I

“Information Service”

Unregulated

5



Net neutrality basics
Net Neutrality Basics

  • Neutral and open public network (the “Internet”)

  • No restrictions on equipment or modes of communication

  • Principles do not permit discrimination, either in pricing or access, of the type, quantity, content, sites, or applications


Net neutrality basics1
Net Neutrality Basics

Fundamental Principles

  • Consumers are entitled to:

    • Access the lawful Internet content of their choice;

    • Run applications and services of their choice subject to the needs of law enforcement;

    • Connect to their choice of legal devices that do not harm the network; and

    • Enjoy positive externalities of competition among providers (network, application, service, and content)


Net neutrality basics2
Net Neutrality Basics

Fundamental Principles (con’t)

  • Other Proposed Principles

    • Balance customer’s need for unfettered access to content/applications with Internet Service Provider’s (ISP’s) network management needs

    • Ensure transparency of ISP’s network management practices

  • BUT

    • Does FCC have statutory authority to enforce Net Neutrality principles?


Fcc authority
FCC Authority

  • Federal Communications Act

    • Title I (Ancillary Jurisdiction)

    • Title II (Common Carrier)

      • Telecommunications Carriers

      • Rate, Entry, Complaint Procedures

    • Title III (Wireless)

      • Broadcast

      • Commercial Mobile Service

    • Title VI

      • Cable Companies


Fcc authority1
FCC Authority

  • Ancillary Jurisdiction

    • General FCC Policy Making Authority under Title I

    • Used by FCC to Deregulate Enhanced Services

      • Computer Inquiry II, III

    • Basic (Regulated – Title II) v. Enhanced (Unregulated -- Title I)

    • 96 Act:

      • Telecommunications Service/Information Service

        • (Same as Basic/Enhanced)

      • FCC now has Forbearance Authority

        • May forbear from regulating under certain conditions


Origins of the comcast decision
Origins of the Comcast Decision

Background

  • Comcast customers complained -- difficult to use “P2P” applications (e.g. BitTorrent)

  • FCC investigation -- Comcast monitored customer’s content, not destination

  • Result: Comcast blocked Internet traffic and limited customers’ Internet use


Origins of the comcast decision1
Origins of the Comcast Decision

The FCC required Comcast to:

Disclose its network management practice details;

Submit a compliance plan by end of year (2008); and

Present new, non-discriminatory network management practices to customers and the Commission

13


Origins of the comcast decision2
Origins of the Comcast Decision

Enforcing an “Open” Internet -- Concerns

  • Bypassing open Internet protections

    • Specialized services offered in bundles?

  • Specialized services -- circumventing the rules

    • Network capacity not expanded as intended

  • Anti-competitive conduct among broadband providers

    • The FCC labeled Comcast’s failure to disclose their practices as “anticompetitive”


D c circuit court reversal
D.C. Circuit Court Reversal

Comcast argued that the FCC:

  • Asserted its authority based on provisions of the Communications Act which do not apply to Comcast

  • Did not abide by notice and comment procedures in adopting rules applied against Comcast


D c circuit court reversal1
D.C. Circuit Court Reversal

  • D.C. Circuit Court Holding:

    • FCC Has No Jurisdiction Over Comcast Network Management Practices

    • Ancillary Jurisdiction Must Be “Ancillary” to Other FCC Statutory Authority

      • e.g. to Title II (Telecom), or Title VI (Cable)

      • Not a Standalone Grant of Authority

  • Reversed and Vacated FCC Comcast Decision

    • Did not reach other issues

      • e.g., whether FCC may enforce a policy and not just its own rules


Fcc third way proposal
FCC “Third Way” Proposal

  • FCC Response to D.C. Circuit Reversal

    • “Third Way” Approach to Internet Access Regulation

  • Proposed by FCC Chairman - Public Notice

    • Regulate Broadband Internet Access by:

      • Transmission Component (“Pipes”)

        • Regulate as Title II “telecommunications service” (currently unregulated under Title I)

      • Forbearance

        • Piecemeal application of Title II (USF, consumer protection)

      • Network Processing (“Cloud”)

        • Leave unregulated


Fcc third way proposed regulation
FCC “Third Way” Proposed Regulation

Portal

Cloud

Still “info” service

(Title I)

Pipe

Regulate as “Telecommunications Service” (Title II)

- Forbearance

- USF


Fcc third way proposal1
FCC “Third Way” Proposal

  • Practical Application and Questions

    • Does the FCC have statutory authority to make this change or do they need Congressional approval?

    • Internet and Title II

      • Legal and practical implications?

19


Net neutrality by other means
Net Neutrality By Other Means

Policy Enforcement:

  • FCC Proposal - Case by case basis

    • Citations

    • Forfeiture penalties

  • FCC policy making authority (“Third Way”)?

    • FCC released “Framework for Broadband Internet Service” NOI on June 17, 2010.

20


Net neutrality by other means1
Net Neutrality By Other Means

National Broadband Plan (NBP)

  • Part of the 2009 American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (“Broadband Stimulus Bill”)

    • $7.2 billion allocated for national broadband deployment

  • Will the Internet be subject to USF assessment?

    • NBP contemplates USF, access and intercarrier compensation schemes should be reformed together

    • Implications for 21st century communications -- wireless applications (Google voice)

21


Net neutrality by other means2
Net Neutrality By Other Means

  • Meanwhile “Third Way” NOI -- Awaiting Public Comments

  • FCC spectrum management – a “back door” approach to net neutrality?

  • A Republican controlled Congress will likely chill Net Neutrality legislative initiatives

    • Sept. 2010 -- Open Internet Act of 2010 failed to make it out of the House Commerce Committee

22


Final thoughts
Final Thoughts

FCC agenda will emerge in the future – but meanwhile:

  • Clear emphasis on broadband deployment (especially wireless)

  • Belief in merits of net neutrality

  • Agency’s focus for now is on data gathering and broadband stimulus funding

  • USF enforcement will almost certainly be a priority


Final thoughts1
Final Thoughts

All of this is very complicated – and a bit fuzzy…

BUT… DO REMEMBER:

WHEN IN DOUBT – ASK YOUR LAWYER!

Sapronov & Associates, P.C.

400 Northridge Rd., Suite 515

Atlanta, Georgia 30350

Telephone: 770-399-9100

Facsimile: 770-395-0505

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.wstelecomlaw.com


ad