170 likes | 289 Views
This document presents key considerations discussed during the Synoptic Network Workshop held in Boulder from April 22-24, 2013. Emphasizing crucial parameters such as detector size (4k x 4k pixels), field of view (~0.7°), and image scale (120 arcsec/mm), the workshop explored the technical requirements for successful wide field telescopes. Topics include resolution determined by sampling theorem, SNR evaluations, and the need for image stabilization to mitigate motion errors. Practical design options, including various telescope configurations, were also discussed for optimal performance.
E N D
Some General Considerations on Wide Field Telescopes Dirk Soltau Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Basic assumptionsandimmediateconclusions • Detectorsize: 4k x 4 k pixels, 5 µm pixelsize • Field ofview: 0.7° 2500 arcsec • pixelscale = 0.6 arcsec • imagescale = 120 arcsec/mm • focallength = 1720 mm Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Diameter • resolutionaccordingtosamplingtheorem: 1.2 arcsec = 5.8 µrad • D = 1.22 λ / 5.8E-6 • minimum Diameter w.r.tresolution = 0.1 m Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Bandwidth, SNR • Assumedbandwidth: 5 pm ( 50 mÅ, R = 100000 @ 500 nm) • AssumedExposure time: 0.005 s F Ret Cam1 PBS Sun Telescope Cam2 Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Counts and SNR for 5 msexp. time Diameter shouldexceed 0,5 m f/# < f/3.5 Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Mounting (commoninstrumentplatform) • May beweneed different instrumentsfor different SNR requirements (Polarimetry vs. imaging) • Severalinstruments on oneplatformmaybe a solution SOLIS Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Image Motion and Noise 2 pixel 0.1 m 0.1 m 1 pixel 1 m 1 m Sun = 104isoplanaticpatches Averageseeinginducedimagemotionofthewholedisk will bearound 0.01 pixel
Time constant 1 m 0.1 m
Image motion: Effect on imagesubtraction - Example: shiftby 0.1 pixel 10-2noise = Image stabilizationneeded, dual beam polarimetrydesirable
Image stabilization? • Main causeprobably instrumental: • spatialdimensions: 1m 1 arcsec = 5 µm atthemirroredge • Limbsensor vs. Correlationtracker • Tiptiltmirror • relayoptics? • Solar Orbiter (PHI) concept? Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Optical Design Options • Design drivingparameters: • Detector • SNR @ typicalexposure time Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Refractor • Goodperformance, limited diameter Example: Chrotel (KIS) Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Example: Maksutov D = 200 mm, FOV = 0.5 deg + Potential forevacuation - 10 µm Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Example: Ritchey-Chretien Cassegrain D = 600 mm, FOV = 0.5 deg • Mightneed a fieldcorrectorif larger • needsbaffling (daylightblindness) Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Consider different designsfor different purposes • Severaltelescopes on a commonstructure • SOLIS concept Titisee
Summary • Basic requirement: SNR • Image stabilization – ifnecessary – has large impact on the design • Diameter not determinedbyresolutionarguments telescopedoesn‘tneedtobediffraction limited • Evacuationshouldbeconsidered (catadioptricsystem?) • Multiple telescopeplatformmightbeuseful • Ritchey-Chretien promising. But falselightcountermeasuresnecessary Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013
Photon electrons Synoptic Network Workshop, Boulder 22.-24.4.2013