1 / 27

PETRONAS TWIN TOWER, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA

PETRONAS TWIN TOWER, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA. By- Nawal Kishor Dwivedi M.Tech Structural Engineering , MNIT Jaipur. GENERAL FACTS. 6 RD TALLEST BUILDING IN THE WORLD , MARCH 2014 TALLEST BUILDING IN WORLD FROM 1998 TO 2004 PRECEEDED BY INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE

lexine
Download Presentation

PETRONAS TWIN TOWER, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PETRONAS TWIN TOWER, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA By- NawalKishorDwivedi M.Tech Structural Engineering , MNIT Jaipur

  2. GENERAL FACTS 6RD TALLEST BUILDING IN THE WORLD , MARCH 2014 TALLEST BUILDING IN WORLD FROM 1998 TO 2004 PRECEEDED BY INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE CENTER , HONG KONG ,CHINA SURPASSED BY NANJING GREENLAND FINANCIAL COMPLEX ,CHINA LOCATION : KLLC , JALAN AMPANG , KUALA LUMPUR , MALAYSIA

  3. TYPE : COMMERCIAL , TOURIST ATTRACTION CONSTRUCTON STARTED ON 1ST MARCH 1993 AND COMPLETED ON 1ST MARCH 1996 COST : US$ 1.6 BILLION OWNER : KLLC HOLDINGS NUMBER OF STOREY: 88 (+ 4 BASEMENT FLOORS) TOTAL HEIGHT : 451.9 m (Architectural ) 378.6 m ( Roof ) LIFTS/ELEVATORS : 78

  4. FLOOR AREA : 395000 m sq MATERIAL : CONCRETE , STEEL ARCHITECT : CESAR PELLI STRUCTURAL ENGINEER : THORNTON THORMASETI CONTRACTORS : TOWER 1 : HAZAMA CORPORATION TOWER 2 : SAMSUNG ENGG.& CO.

  5. PROJECT DATA EACH TOWER : 88 STOREYS TOWER 1 :PETRONAS HEAD QUARTERS TOWER 2 :LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE TENANTS, KLCC HOLDINGS SMALLER CIRCULAR BUSTLE OR ANEXX ADDED TO EACH TOWER RISING 44 STOREY TOWERS CONNECTED BY SKY BRIDGE AT 41ST & 42ND STOREY

  6. SKY BRIDGE: CENTRE-LINE SPAN: 58.44 METRES; WIDTH, 5.29 METRES HEIGHT, 9.45 METRES FINISHED CEILING HEIGHT: 2.65 METRES HEIGHT OF PINNACLES: 73.5 - 75 METRES FLOOR AREA VARRIES AS TOWER ACCENDS CENTRAL CORE GROSS AREA :510 m sq approx FACILITIES : 3 LEVEL CONCERT HALL 6 STOREY RETAIL AND ENTERTAINMENT PARK PETROLEUM RESEARCH CENTRE 4 STOREY BASEMENT PARKING etc.

  7. FOUNDATION EARLY EXCAVATION PROBLEM : LIMESTONE BEDROCK 300000 METRIC TON WEIGHT OF EACH TOWER TO BE SPREAD ON MAT FOUNDATION PRESSURE EXERTED BY EACH TOWER : 1140 K-Pa (more than twice bearing cap. of soil available) ALSO BED ROCK WAS SLOPING – MAY LEAD TO FAILURE CONSTRUCTION SITE SHIFTED 60 m AWAY FINALLY RESTED ON CONCRETE MAT ANCHORED WITH CONCRETE FRICTION PILES 4.5 M THICK RAFT SUPPORTED ON 45-105 M RECTANGULAR PILES

  8. LONGER PILES WHERE DEEP BED ROCK- TO AVOID DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT M45 CONCRETE USED FOR PILES 13200 cu m OF M60 CONCRETE USED IN RAFT CHILLED WATER USED- MINIMIZE DIFFRENTIAL TEMPERAURE

  9. CENTRAL CORE CENTRAL CORE IN EACH TOWER ACCOMMODATE – LIFTS, EXIT STAIRS, MECHANICAL SERVICES TWO SOLID WALLS RUNNING N-S AND E-W- WEB CANTILEVER BEAMS PROJECTING-MAKES IT STIFF TAKES MORE THAN HALF THE TWISTING MOMENT HIGHLY REINFORCED THICK CORNER WALLS- RESIST WIND CORE VARRIES FROM 22 sq m TO 19 X 22 m IN FOUR STEPS OUTER WALLS 750 TO 350 mm INNER WALLS COSTANT 350 mm- TO AVOID COMPLICATION WITH LIFT SHAFT CONCRETE GRADE DROPS FROM 80 -40 Mpa AS IT ACCENTS

  10. FLOOR PLAN

  11. CORE WALL LAYOUT

  12. COLUMNS COLUMNS CAST IN REUSABLE STEEL FORMS FINELY FINISHED COLUMNS OPEN TO VIEW AT MOST OF THE FLOORS 16 TOWER COLUMN- VARRY ALONG HIGHT IN DIA. 2.4 m TO 1.4 m DIA CONCRETE VARRIED FROM M80 TO M30 IN 3 STEPS 12 BUSTLE COLUMS – 1.4m TO 1m SETBACKS AT 60, 73 AND 82 SLOPING COLUMS OVER 3 STOREY HEIGHTS ABOVE FLOOR 84 – HIGH SLOPE – STEEL COLUMN USED TO AVOID COMPLICATION

  13. COLUMN SIZE AND COLUMN GRADE

  14. SLOPING COLUMN

  15. BEAMS TAPERED RING BEAMS ALL AROUND DEPTH 1.15 m AT COLUMN TO 725 mm AT FLAT ZONE SPAN VARIATION DUE TO COLUMN CHANGES AND SET BACKS BEAM GRADE MATCHES COLUMN GRADE TO SIMPLIFY PUMPING OUTRIGGERS E-W OUTRIGGER LINK CORE AND COLUMNS AT FLOOR 38-40 3 LEVEL BEAMS LINKED BY MID SPAN POSTS – HELP RESIST WIND EFFECT

  16. SKY BRIDGE DOUBLE DECK BRIDGE SPANNING 58.4 m CONNECTS TWO TOWER AT SKYLOBBY ELEVATOR TRANSFER STATION ON FLOOR 41 AND 42 EASY CIRCULATION B/W UPPER TOWER FLOORS MINIMIZE LIFT USAGE REDUCES FIRE EXIT REQUIREMENT GREAT HEIGHT AND SPAN REQUIRES STEEL FOR LIGHT WEIGHT AND EASY CONST. TWO HINGED ARCH SUPPORTS THE SPAN SELF CENTRING ACTION FROM RESTRAIN AT ARCH CROWN AND SPHERICAL PIN AT SUPPORTS

  17. PINNACLE EACH TOWER CROWNED BY- 73 m TAPERING TOP ACCOMMODATES – BUILDING MAINTENANCE MACHINE , AVIATION LIGHTING AND LIGHTING PROTECTION DUE TO STEEP SLOPING COLUMN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION IMPARACTICAL STEEL USED THROUGHOUT LOWER PINNACLE- 8 STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAMES UPPER PINNACLE – SINGLE MAST OF TAPERING CIRCULAR CROSS SECTION

  18. PINNACLE ELEVATION

  19. DYNAMIC STUDIES CROSS WIND EFFECTS ON STRUCTURE AND USER COMFORT ANALYTICAL MODELLING : 3D MODELLING USING SAP90 INCLUDING PERIMETER BEAMS, COLUMNS, CENTRAL COLUMN REPRESENTING CORE & OUTRIGGER SYSTEM COLUMN GROSS CROSS SECTION PROPERTIES USED- COMPRESSIVE STRESSES DOMINANT ELASTIC MODULI ‘E’ VALUES VARIED WITH STRENGTH ACCORDING TO ACI318 ‘E’ VALUES NOT REDUCED FOR CREEP- SHORT TERM WIND LOADING BEAMS ASSUMED TO BE ‘CRACKED’- AVG. STIFFNESS I/2

  20. WIND MODELLING DESIGN WIND 35 m/s ASSUMED AT 10m ELEVATION RETURN PERIOD 50 YEARS FORCING FUNCTION DETERMINED USING IT ANALYSIS FOR DYNAMIC FORCE AT 1-2% DAMPING RESULTS REVEALED 2% DAMPING REDUCES BASE SHEAR VALUES WELL BELOW LIMITS NO REQIREMENT OF TUNED DAMPERS SIMILAR DYNAMIC MODELLING DONE FOR SKY BRIDGE,PINNACLE SKY BRIDGE REQIRED TUNED MASS DAMPERS-3 EACH LEG

  21. CONCLUSION MIXED CONSTRUCTION FOR COST AND USABILITY BENEFIT USE OF HPC – REASONABLE SECTIONS, LOW COST , MORE SPACE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION- SIMPLE EQUIPMENTS LESS SKILL , EASY CONNECTION CONCRETE – BENEFITS WIND BEHAVIOUR –INHERENT STIFFNESS AND DAMPING STEEL – FAST AND FLEXIBLE ERECTION- PEMITS LAST MINUTE CHANGE WIND EXCITATION –BENIFICIAL FOR–SIZE 55mm to .3m

More Related