epigraphy n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Epigraphy PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Epigraphy

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 8

Epigraphy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 134 Views
  • Uploaded on

Epigraphy. Optional Course MA/MPhil Ancient History Leiden University 2013-2014 2nd semester Instructor: Dr F.G. Naerebout f.g.naerebout@hum.leidenuniv.nl. 1 Epigraphy = study of inscriptions = intaglio lettering in a hard nonorganic surface (carved, engraved, struck, stamped, cast…)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Epigraphy' - lew


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
epigraphy

Epigraphy

Optional Course MA/MPhil Ancient History

Leiden University

2013-2014

2nd semester

Instructor: Dr F.G. Naerebout

f.g.naerebout@hum.leidenuniv.nl

slide3

1 Epigraphy = study of inscriptions = intaglio lettering in a hard nonorganic surface (carved, engraved, struck, stamped, cast…)

2 But in actual practice we have to be aware of the fuzzy edges of the discipline: some intaglio texts are excluded, some non-intaglio texts are included

3 Whether a text falls within the realm of epigraphy is decided on the basis of its exterior characteristics: the carrier and the particular writing process involved. Epigraphy is not concerned with a particular kind of texts, as far as their contents is concerned (even if in practice some textual genres make up most of our inscriptional evidence)

4 There are many different epigraphies

slide4

5 Inscriptions are a source of the utmost importance: they have the ‘immediacy’ of the archival sources of later periods; they cover subjects neglected in the literary sources; they provide new evidence

6 Epigraphy is a discipline in its own right – of a highly technical nature

7 Epigraphy is a discipline with a long history – whatever start date you choose, there are centuries of previous scholarship

8 Bringing the inscriptional evidence together has been at the heart of the epigraphic endeavour since the 16th century – there exist many overlapping publications

slide5

9 The non-epigrapher (historian, classicist, archaeologist...) who wants to use epigraphic sources

    • has to find his way through the jungle of publications  bibliography; concordance (NB: Trismegistos); SEG; AE; BE; EBGR
    • has to find his way in the corpora
    • has to be able to judge the editorial/interpretative interventions of the epigrapher
  • Editorial sigla: The Leiden System
  • The ideal edition: ID, title, image, date, measurements & description of the carrier, provenance, bibliography, transcribed text with abbreviations expanded and lacunae filled (if possible), translation, comments
slide6

12 Two basic heuristic procedures: trace a text departing from a reference; establish the presence (or lack) of epigraphic evidence departing from a particular question

  • 13 Critical use of the evidence requires one to establish the editorial history of a text
  • 14 How to find as yet unknown epigraphic material:
    • a) by provenance
    • b) by date
    • c) by subject (collections arranged according to subject; subject indices in any epigraphic collection; any publication on a subject making use of epigraphic sources; Greek or Latin vocabulary)  Typology
    • d) by some specific characteristic: carrier and writing, language…
slide7

15 QUIZ

16 PAPER: choose a subject and a question  find epigraphic evidence  publish a small corpus (mettre en série!!) paying attention to publication history and editorial correctness. Provide full details  analyse the epigraphic evidence and discuss in how far that evidence can contribute to the answering of your question (be aware of the pros and cons of the material in your selection)  you may suggest some hypothesis, but you may also conclude that more (different) evidence is needed. As long as you have seriously discussed the potential of the inscriptional evidence.