1 / 27

AmeriCorps State and National Evaluation Requirements

AmeriCorps State and National Evaluation Requirements. August 16, 2013. Learning Objectives. Increased understanding of broader federal policy context Increased understanding of AmeriCorps State and National evaluation requirements. Federal Policy Context. Code of Federal Regulations.

levi
Download Presentation

AmeriCorps State and National Evaluation Requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AmeriCorps State and NationalEvaluation Requirements August 16, 2013

  2. Learning Objectives • Increased understanding of broader federal policy context • Increased understanding of AmeriCorps State and National evaluation requirements

  3. Federal Policy Context

  4. Code of Federal Regulations The Code of Federal Regulations, or CFR, is the collection of all administrative rules and regulations from the various departments and agencies of the federal government. It is organized by titles, chapters, and parts that cover specific regulatory areas

  5. Code of Federal Regulations • http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr • Select Agency List from left navigation bar • Scroll down to CNCS, select 45 CFR Chapters XII, XXV • Scroll down to XXV, select 2500-2599 • Select 2522 • Select Subpart E – Evaluation Requirements

  6. Code of Federal Regulations Primary Focus of Today’s Webinar: Evaluating Programs: Requirements and Procedures (§§.700 -.740) CNCS finalized these regulations July 8, 2005

  7. Definition of Evaluation …evaluation uses scientifically-based research methods to assess the effectiveness of programs by comparing the observed program outcomes with what would have happened in the absence of the program. §2522.700

  8. Definition of Performance Measurement Performance measurement is the process of systematically and regularly collecting and monitoring data related to the direction of observed changes in communities, participants (members), or end beneficiaries receiving your program’s services. It is intended to provide an indication of your program’s operations and performance. §2522.700

  9. Evaluation RequirementsNational Direct & State Competitive ($500K+) …you must arrange for an independent evaluation of your program, and you must submit the evaluation with any application to the Corporation for competitive funds… § 2522.710

  10. Strengthening the Evidence BaseNational Direct & State Competitive ($500K+) • Greater investments of public resources warrant more rigorous evidence and evaluation requirements • Independent, impact evaluations designed to provide evidence of a causal relationship between program activities and participant outcomes are required

  11. Evaluation RequirementsNational Direct & State Competitive ($500K+) • Your evaluation must cover a minimum of one year but may cover longer periods. § 2522.720

  12. Evaluation RequirementsNational Direct & State Competitive (less than $500K) or Education Award Program Corporation …you must conduct an internal evaluation of your program, and you must submit the evaluation with any application to the Corporation for competitive funds… § 2522.710

  13. Strengthening the Evidence BaseNational Direct & State Competitive (less than $500K) or Education Award Program Corporation • Encourage use of experimental or quasi-experimental designs but not required • Select a study design most appropriate for developmental phase of AmeriCorps program (process, implementation, outcome or impact)

  14. Evaluation RequirementsNational Direct & State Competitive (less than $500K) or Education Award Program Corporation • Your evaluation must cover a minimum of one year but may cover longer periods. § 2522.720

  15. Evaluation RequirementsState Commission …you must establish and enforce evaluation requirements for your State formula subgrantees, as you deem appropriate. § 2522.710

  16. Evaluation RequirementsState Formula Grantees If you are a State formula grantee, you must conduct an evaluation, as your State commission requires. § 2522.720

  17. Evaluation Requirements • The Corporation may, in its discretion, supersede these requirements with an alternative evaluation approach, including one conducted by the Corporation at the national level. • Grantees must cooperate fully with all Corporation evaluation activities. § 2522.710

  18. Evaluation RequirementsWhat is due when? • If you are an existing grantee re-competing for AmeriCorps funds for the first time, you must submit an evaluation plan… as part of your application for funding. • If you again compete for AmeriCorps funding after a second three-year grant cycle, you must submit the completed evaluation with your application for funding. § 2522.730

  19. CNCS “Cheat Sheet”

  20. CNCS Priorities • Strengthening the evidence base for national service using scientifically-based research methods • Supporting grantee efforts to build the evidence base of their AmeriCorps programs

  21. Strengthening the Evidence Base “In order to maximize the impact of the public investment in national service, CNCS will fund programs that can demonstrate community impact and solve community problems using an evidence-based or evidence-informed approach.” (2013 ACSN NOFO, page 1) “An evidence-based approach is one where the intervention is based on research or backed by statistically significant evaluation findings. “(2012 ACSN NOFO, page 19)

  22. Building Evidence of Effectiveness Evidence Based Attain strong evidence of positive program outcomes Evidence Informed Obtain evidence of positive program outcomes Assess program’s outcomes Ensure effective implementation Identify a strong program design

  23. Supporting Grantees • Grantees that have not completed the evaluation requirements in the proper timeframe are strongly encouraged to provide any evaluation findings available and provide an evaluation plan for the next grant period that would fulfill the requirements • Evaluations that show null or negative findings will not automatically lead to an unacceptable assessment of your program. CNCS expects such findings to be used for program improvements.

  24. Supporting Grantees: Summer 2013 • Disseminate Evaluation FAQs • Conduct Webinars: • Evaluation Capacity Building • CNCS Evaluation Requirements and FAQs • Create central location for evaluation materials on website

  25. Supporting Grantees: Fall 2013 • Grantee Symposium, Performance Measurement & Evaluation Track • Performance Measurement Pre-Conference Workshop • Developing evaluation plans and reports • Evaluation 101 • Initiate individualized technical assistance • 1:1 coaching to help finalize evaluation plans, use performance monitoring and evaluation for program improvement, and develop evaluation reports

  26. Supporting Grantees: 2013 - 2014 • Individualized technical assistance • Evaluation Core Curriculum (webinars, online courses, downloadable resources) • Developing evaluation plans and reports • Evaluation 101 • Logic models • How to report evaluation findings • How to manage an external evaluation • Budgeting for evaluation

  27. Questions and Answers We welcome questions at this time. Thank you.

More Related