1 / 25

WMU Facilities Plan Update: Improvements for Sustainable Infrastructure

This presentation from October 14, 2009, by Palmer Engineering Company and Hazen & Sawyer provides insights into the update of the Facilities Plan for Clark County Fiscal Court. It outlines the importance of a Facilities Plan, the need for updates, existing facilities, environmental considerations, population and flow projections, alternatives analysis, and the involvement of various environmental agencies. The presentation covers the condition of existing facilities, population and flow projections, alternatives considered, recommended solutions, and projected costs for key improvement projects. It emphasizes the significance of the Facilities Plan in ensuring sustainable and compliant infrastructure developments for the future.

leslie-hurst
Download Presentation

WMU Facilities Plan Update: Improvements for Sustainable Infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Facilities Plan Update Clark County Fiscal Court Presentation October 14, 2009 Palmer Engineering Company / Hazen & Sawyer / CDP

  2. What is a Facilities Plan? • Required by the Federal and State Government • 401 KAR 5:006 • The Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1313 • The Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1288 • Requirements • 401 KAR 5:006

  3. Facilities Plan Requirements • Facilities Plan Boundary • Existing Facilities • Population Projections (20 Yrs) • Flow Projections (20 Yrs) • Environmental Considerations • Alternatives Analysis • Schedule

  4. Why Does WMU Need a Facilities Plan Update? • Required when: (401 KAR 5:006) • Major changes to the Facilities • 20 Years since previous Facilities Plan • Current Facilities Plan: 1972 / 1973 • Consent Decree

  5. Facilities Plan Approval Process • Draft Plan • Clearinghouse Comments • Resubmit • Local Agency Approval • Public Hearing • Final Approval

  6. Environmental Agency Involvement • U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife • Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife • Kentucky Heritage Council • Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission • Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection • State Clearinghouse

  7. WMU Existing Facilities • Includes: • 150 miles of gravity sanitary sewer • 15 Miles of Force Main • 17 Pump Stations • 1 WWTP • 7.2 MGD (Average) • 24 MGD (Peak) • 1 Class A Bio-solids facility

  8. Existing Facilities Condition • Aging Infrastructure (I/I) • 27 Recurring Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) • Licking River Watershed – 14 • Kentucky River Watershed – 13 • Pump Station SSO Locations – 5 • Manhole SSO Locations – 21 • SC-WWTP SSO Locations – 1 • Watersheds • 2 River • 14 Sub-watersheds • Licking River - 8 • Kentucky River - 6

  9. Population Projections • Census Data • University of Louisville Data Center • Comprehensive Plan • WMU Database

  10. Flow Projections • Customer Data • Flow Monitoring • WWTP Flow Data

  11. 20 Year Flow Projections Avg. Day Peak Day • Licking River 7.2 MGD 24.0 MGD • Kentucky River 2.0 MGD 10.0 MGD

  12. Alternatives Considered • Single Treatment Plant • River Watershed Treatment Plants (2)

  13. Alternatives Evaluated • Capacity Requirements • Environmental Considerations • Constructability • Implementability • Cost • Capital / O&M / Present Worth • Recommended Alternative • River Watershed Treatment Plants (2)

  14. Discharge Alternatives • Deep Branch Discharge • Kentucky River Discharge Recommended Discharge Alternative • Kentucky River Discharge

  15. Schedule / Costs Project Year Costs • LHC Improvements 2013 $37,000,000 • Maryland Avenue, Wabash, & 2012 $1,500,000 Smith Manor PS 3. Bel-Air & Westside PS 2013 $900,000 4. East Interceptor Improvements 2021 $1,950,000 (Madison / Washington / Flanagan Ave.) 5. Hood Creek Int. / PS / FM TBD $5,800,000 • Hancock Creek Int. / PS / FM TBD $8,800,000 • West Interceptor TBD $7,700,000

  16. Summary • Required Element • Sets Direction • Consent Decree Compliance • Position for the Future

More Related