1 / 23

Consideration of Price Caps Reduction

Consideration of Price Caps Reduction. Meeting of the Board of Governors of the California ISO. By David Parquet Vice President Enron North America Corp. June 28, 2000. California Is Facing an Energy Supply Crisis that a Precipitous Reduction in Price Caps Will only Heighten.

les
Download Presentation

Consideration of Price Caps Reduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Consideration of Price Caps Reduction Meeting of the Board of Governors of the California ISO By David Parquet Vice President Enron North America Corp. June 28, 2000

  2. California Is Facing an Energy Supply Crisis that a Precipitous Reduction in Price Caps Will only Heighten. • The supply shortage is real; California desperately needs new generation. • California has not added any significant new generation since the 1980’s. • The existing thermal generation fleet is aging: 61%  30 years • Demand has exploded with the economic boom, especially in San Francisco Bay Area. • California competes vigorously with the rest of the growing West for increasingly scarce supplies. 2

  3. 3

  4. 4

  5. WSCC Loads (GW) California is not an island and cannot develop a self-contained solution. 5

  6. Pacific Northwest 2000 Hydro Production Relative to 1999 2,000 1,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG -1,000 -2,000 Estimated Difference, MWa -3,000 Estimated -4,000 -5,000 -6,000 -7,000 Month 6

  7. 7

  8. A Price Cap Reduction Will only Increase the Pressure on Reliability of California Electric System • Investment in power plants will go elsewhere, taking jobs, economic and reliability benefits. • Suppliers will sell outside California where markets are more predictable and prices are higher. • Keeping the lights on will get tougher. • Because of the interdependent linkages in California’s electric market, cannot change one aspect of structure without impacting all others. • Uncertainty in the marketplace is the surest way to dry up the growing forward markets. 8

  9. Linkages in California’s Electric Markets ISO A/S A/S Capacity $ Capacity $ MWh MWh Ex Post Price Ex Post Price Load Generation 9

  10. Linkages in California’s Electric Markets ISO A/S A/S Capacity $ Capacity $ MWh MWh Ex Post Price Ex Post Price D.A. PX Index PX Day Ahead Load D.A. PX Index Generation MWh MWh 10

  11. Linkages in California’s Electric Markets ISO A/S A/S Capacity $ Capacity $ MWh MWh Ex Post Price Ex Post Price D.A. PX Index PX Day Ahead Load D.A. PX Index Generation MWh MWh Fixed Price Fixed Price MWh PX Block Forward MWh 11

  12. Linkages in California’s Electric Markets ISO A/S A/S Capacity $ Capacity $ MWh MWh Ex Post Price Ex Post Price D.A. PX Index PX Day Ahead Load D.A. PX Index Generation MWh MWh Fixed Price Fixed Price MWh PX Block Forward MWh Negotiated Price Negotiated Price MWh MWh Non CAISO MARKET 12

  13. Gross Underscheduling of Load Is a Real Problem • CTC payments can theoretically be increased by underscheduling demand in the PX Day ahead markets • However, underscheduling demand increases prices and reduces reliability for everyone • nearly 30% of ISO load showed up in real time on June 14, 2000 • ISO dealt with situation with only 100 MW of blackouts--a remarkable achievement • Underschedulers are victims of their own actions and strategies • Assertions to the contrary notwithstanding, there have been significant opportunities to hedge forward prices • ~ 1800 MW in entire PX block forward for SP15 in June, 2000 • Only ~800 MW for SCE out of 2,200 MW authorized • Clear market signals to hedge 13

  14. Gross Underscheduling of Load Is a Real Problem If all power scheduled in PX Day Ahead market, except for small imbalances, market should be in equilibrium: PX DA, PX HA, ISO Ex Post 14

  15. Gross Underscheduling of Load Is a Real Problem In actual fact, there is an incentive to underschedule, but consequence is pressure on real time reliability as Ex Post load grows. 15

  16. Gross Underscheduling of Load Is a Real Problem But when there is massive underscheduling in a tight supply market, the ISO may have to take drastic action. Increasing load to Ex Post 16

  17. GrossUnderscheduling of Load Is a Real Problem And, when load is growing faster than forecasts, the consequences are amplified. Increasing load to Ex Post 17

  18. Gross Underscheduling of Load Is a Real Problem If price caps are reduced to $250/MWh in a scarce supply market, ISO may not be able to maintain reliability due to magnitude of Ex Post load. 18

  19. Recommendations • Do not reduce price caps from $750/MWh to $250/MWh. • Determine the root causes of the problem. - Market power abuse: supply and/or demand? - Market structure? - Load growth? - Resource scarcity? - Remove price caps? Parity with PX caps? • Develop alternative solutions: market and other. - Structural market changes - Facilitate new resources/ease congestion: generation, transmission - Demand side: bidding, real time prices 19

  20. 20

  21. 21

  22. 22

More Related