1 / 17

Navigating the Publishing Process: An Introduction to Submission, Review, and Publication

Navigating the Publishing Process: An Introduction to Submission, Review, and Publication. Part One: Submission. Topics:. Framing the project Key features of a good paper Selecting a journal Submission The review process When to contact the editor. Topics:.

lerch
Download Presentation

Navigating the Publishing Process: An Introduction to Submission, Review, and Publication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Navigating the Publishing Process: An Introduction to Submission, Review, and Publication

  2. Part One: Submission

  3. Topics: • Framing the project • Key features of a good paper • Selecting a journal • Submission • The review process • When to contact the editor

  4. Topics: • Framing the project • Key features of a good paper • Selecting a journal • Submission • The review process • When to contact the editor But first . . .

  5. TO ASK QUESTIONS!

  6. Framing: 5 key questions • What do you have to say? • Who’s going to be interested? • How does it build on what we already know? • How significant is your message? • How sure are you of the findings?

  7. Answers should indicate: • Manuscript length • Scope • Writing style • Type of journal

  8. What I look for in a manuscript • Early overview • Clear, compelling statement of purpose • Conceptual grounding • Intro that clarifies / connects key constructs • Hypotheses / research Q’s that are clear, meaningful, answerable, interrelated, flow logically from introduction

  9. What I look for in a manuscript • Appropriate sample -- full details • Procedures / measures – enough info for replicability / trust • Systematic, sensible analyses • Tables / figures that speed comprehension • Low – fat, no – bull Discussion (key findings)

  10. What I look for in a manuscript • Directives for research and practice • Awareness of limitations

  11. 5 little things that bug me • Silly typos • “Little is known” as justification • Over – referencing • Cryptic tables / figures (SPSS / SAS) • “Star Trek” Discussions

  12. Selecting the right journal • Consult colleagues • Consider your citations • Read the journal’s articles / TOC • Look for mission statement • Review editorial board, associate editors • Communicate with editor

  13. A good cover letter . . . • is short • Indicates purpose / significance • highlights special features • explains relevance to readership • notes special circumstances • suggests reviewers???

  14. Agree Assoc Ed review No Disagree Letter to author Editor screening Assign Action Ed. Find reviewers Reviews returned Maybe

  15. When should / can I contact the editor? • No acknowledgment • Two weeks past editor – specified decision date • Three months past submission

  16. End of Part One. Comments?

More Related