1 / 8

ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort

ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort. Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010. ILC DR Working Group goals. Goals of the LC DR Working Group are:

leona
Download Presentation

ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010

  2. ILC DR Working Group goals Goals of the LC DR Working Group are: • To give a recommendation on the feasibility of a shorter damping ring by comparing the electron cloud build-up and instability for the 6.4km and 3.2km rings with a 6 ns bunch spacing by March 2010, then • Following the CesrTA program, working to give our recommendation on e- cloud mitigations and evaluate the electron cloud in the shorter 3.2 km ring with a 3 ns bunch spacing (on hold: pending decision on 3 ns) • Furthermore starting later in 2010, to fully integrate the CesrTA results into the Damping Ring design.

  3. ILC DR Working Group - Deliverables Recommendation for the reduction of the ILC Positron Damping Ring Circumference By March 2010 • Recommendation for the baseline and alternate solutions for the electron cloud mitigation in various regions of the ILC Positron Damping Ring. Following CesrTA program

  4. Build Up Input Parameters for ECLOUD ilc-DR 6.4 Km, 6 ns bunch spacing*. *https://wiki.lepp.cornell.edu/ilc/pub/Public/DampingRings/WebHome/DampingRingsFillPatterns.xls

  5. e-cloud “distribution” - 6km ring SEY=0.9 SEY=1.2 SEY=1.4 Snapshot of the cloud distribution in dipole “just before” the passage of the last bunch for: R=25%, =90% Theo Demma, LNF

  6. ILC DR instability simulations • CMAD a tracking and e-cloud beam instability parallel code (M.P. SLAC) • Taking MAD(X) optics file at input, thus tracking the beam in a real lattice and applying the interaction beam-electron cloud over the whole ring • New simulations: finding higher threshold in DCO4 then in previous DCO2 lattice (in DCO2 we set at input 10% beam jitter that lowered threshold..) DC04 lattice: 6.4 km ring DSB3 lattice: 3.2 km ring AVERAGE RING DENSITY (M. Pivi, SLAC)

  7. ILC DR instability simulations • CMAD a tracking and e-cloud beam instability parallel code (M.P. SLAC) • Taking MAD(X) optics file at input, thus tracking the beam in a real lattice and applying the interaction beam-electron cloud over the whole ring • New simulations: finding higher threshold in DCO4 then in previous DCO2 lattice (in DCO2 we set at input 10% beam jitter that lowered threshold..) DC04 lattice: 6.4 km ring DSB3 lattice: 3.2 km ring DENSITY IN MAGNETS (M. Pivi, SLAC)

  8. Summary WG collaboration: running new campaign of build-up and beam instability simulations for latest DCO4 and DSB3 lattices Build-up simulations: preliminary, SEY=1.2 appears to be a safe value for the 6.4km DR Given the same current and bunch distance we expect similar or even higher instability threshold for the shorter ring Instability simulations. Found strong dependence on beam jitter in ILC DR: 10% sy beam offset can lower instability threshold by factor ~2 On track for March recommendation. Still needed: build-up simulations in wigglers (and quadrupoles)

More Related