1 / 18

International Workshop: Istanbul – Twente – Sarajevo GROUP 2 Mees Beeker Sibel Kirca

International Workshop: Istanbul – Twente – Sarajevo GROUP 2 Mees Beeker Sibel Kirca Serdar Köro ğlu Aida Kulenovi ć Mirjan Mehmedinovi ć Tjark van de Merwe Burcu Ölez. THREE CONCEPTS developed concepts: Plain & Easy. THREE CONCEPTS 1. Plain & Easy. 01. 02. 03.

lelia
Download Presentation

International Workshop: Istanbul – Twente – Sarajevo GROUP 2 Mees Beeker Sibel Kirca

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. International Workshop: Istanbul – Twente – Sarajevo GROUP 2 Mees Beeker Sibel Kirca Serdar Köroğlu Aida Kulenović Mirjan Mehmedinović Tjark van de Merwe Burcu Ölez

  2. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy THREE CONCEPTS 1. Plain & Easy 01 02 03 Plain and simple market stallEasy to install, maintain, disassemble and useVery light and permeable pavilion 01 Construction and floor plan 02 Possible usage of pavilion 03 Pavilion in its environment, connected

  3. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed THREE CONCEPTS 2. Open & Closed 01 02 03 Patterns from the areaMoveable façadesExtendable area 01 Extending pavilion 02 Pavilion in its environment 03 Possibility for façade material

  4. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic THREE CONCEPTS 3. Static & Dynamic 01 02 03 04 All functionalities are in the core Easily extendable 01Unit mass 02Outer shell 03 Structure 04 The core

  5. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison KEY CRITERIA COMPARISATION Score indecisive… Static & Dynamic has most potential

  6. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE CONTEXT OF SITE orientation / approach / accessibility routing / zoning / relation to adjacent buildings / scale/proportion 01 02 03 Maximum capacity of the trams is estimated at 12000 visitors/hrFour axes in areaDesign will be permeable to discourage people to stay to long in entrance area 01 amount of people entering the park 02 analyses of the park 03 demand for permeability in the new design

  7. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE CONTEXT OF SITE orientation / approach / accessibility routing / zoning / relation to adjacent buildings / scale/proportion 02 03 01 Functions of pavilions will be divided to maintain and boost the flow of people towards the desired area.The minimum street width at maximum capacity is 10 m.Configuration of pavilions will help steering visitors to desired areas. 01Arrangement of functions to the area 02Possible arrangement of pavilions 03Key to simbols/lines of picture two

  8. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT BUILDING CONCEPT Scenario 1 fast food restaurant, scenario 2 restaurant with seating; Scenario 3 tea room; Scenario 4 shop; 5 exhibition space, scenario 01 02 03 04 01 All functionalities are in the core Easily extendable 01Unit mass 02Outer shell 03 Structure 04 The core

  9. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 SCENARIOS Scenario 1 fast food restaurant, scenario 2 restaurant with seating; Scenario 3 tee room; Scenario 4 shop; 5 exhibition space, scenario 01 02 03

  10. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 SCENARIOS Scenario 1 fast food restaurant, scenario 2 restaurant with seating; Scenario 3 tee room; Scenario 4 shop; 5 exhibition space, scenario Text

  11. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 • 3D digital / physical models 3D DIGITAL / PHYSICAL MODELS 02 03 01Building level 02Articulated level 03Urban level

  12. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 • 3D digital / physical models • CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION 01 02 03 Text 01Possibility of stretching the pavilion 02Concept of closed and opened wall 03Concept of closed and opened pavilion

  13. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 • 3D digital / physical models • CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION • CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION

  14. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 • 3D digital / physical models • CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION • CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION • KEY CRITERIA • Multi functionality & Transformability KEY CRITERIA – MULTI FUNCTIONALITY & TRANSFORMABILITY Building: restaurant, bookshop System: core Component: combine floor & roof 01 01Multifunctional components

  15. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 • 3D digital / physical models • CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION • CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION • KEY CRITERIA • Multi functionality & Transformability KEY CRITERIA – MULTI FUNCTIONALITY & TRANSFORMABILITY Building: restaurant, bookshop System: core Component: combine floor & roof 01 01Multifunctional components

  16. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 • 3D digital / physical models • CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION • CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION • KEY CRITERIA • Multi functionality & Transformability • Sustainability KEY CRITERIA – SUSTAINABILITY 01 02 03 • Design for Disassembly • Seperated garbage collecting by tenants and visitors • Using solar energy for lighting 01Functional Levels – Duffy and Brand 02Recycling bins, seperated garbage 03Solar panels, possibly installed at central area

  17. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 • 3D digital / physical models • CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION • CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION • KEY CRITERIA • Multi functionality & Transformability • Sustainability • Comfort & health KEY CRITERIA – COMFORT & HEALTH 01 02 Sub-criteria 01Phase Changing Material for roof by Alderman, Robert J. 02 Design to realize hygiene

  18. THREE CONCEPTS • developed concepts: • Plain & Easy • Open & Closed • Static & Dynamic • key criteria comparison • CONTEXT OF SITE • BUILDING CONCEPT • scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 • 3D digital / physical models • CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION • CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION • KEY CRITERIA • Multi functionality & Transformability • Sustainability • Comfort & health • QUESTIONS? Questions?

More Related