1 / 33

Kannapolis City Schools

This report highlights the assessment results and school accountability measures for Kannapolis City Schools in the 2009-10 academic year. It covers various aspects such as EOC retests, ABC Recognition, EOG tests, subgroup performance, and AYP progress. The report also looks ahead to the 2010-11 academic year, mentioning changes in accountability models, initiatives for college readiness, and efforts to enhance SAT participation and scores.

leigh-woodard
Download Presentation

Kannapolis City Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kannapolis City Schools 2009-10 Student Assessment And School Accountability Report

  2. New for 2009-10 • EOC retests were included in AYP and ABC performance. • Students did not take the Physics or Chemistry EOCs

  3. ABC Recognition Categories

  4. KCS ABC Recognition

  5. Grades 3 – 4 Reading

  6. Grades 5 - 6 Reading

  7. Grades 7 - 8 Reading

  8. Grades 3 – 8 Reading

  9. Grades 3 - 4 Math

  10. Grades 5 - 6 Math

  11. Grades 7 – 8 Math

  12. Grades 3 – 8 Math

  13. KCS EOC Performance

  14. Writing

  15. Adequate Yearly Progress • 10 Subgroups for EOG Reading Test • 10 Subgroups for EOG Math Test • 10 Subgroups for 10th grade Reading and Writing • 10 Subgroups for 10th grade Math • 10 Subgroups for Reading 95% tested rule • 10 Subgroups for Math 95% tested rule • 1 Attendance for 3 – 8 or 1 graduation rate

  16. Adequate Yearly Progress Subgroups must have 40 students who have been in membership for at least 140 days to be considered. • School as a whole • American Indian • Asian • Black • Hispanic • Multi-racial • White • Limited English Proficient • Students with Disabilities • Economically Disadvantaged

  17. Revised AYP Goals

  18. Grade 3 Reading Subgroups

  19. Grade 4 Reading Subgroups

  20. Grade 5 Reading Subgroups

  21. Grade 6 Reading Subgroups

  22. Grade 7 Reading Subgroups

  23. Grade 8 Reading Subgroups

  24. Grade 3 Math Subgroups

  25. Grade 4 Math Subgroups

  26. Grade 5 Math Subgroups

  27. Grade 6 Math Subgroups

  28. Grade 7 Math Subgroups

  29. Grade 8 Math Subgroups

  30. 2009-2010 Summary • All schools are Schools of Progress. • Shady Brook has exited from school improvement. • KIS has exited from school improvement in reading and is one year out in math. • All schools met growth or high growth. • Even though it is not officially reported, KCS met high growth as a district.

  31. Looking Forward to 2010-2011 • No state level student accountability Gateways or EXIT Standards • No Geometry EOC • Race to the Top • New Accountability Model?

  32. Looking Forward to 2010-2011 • New Accountability Model will include measure for college and career readiness. • SAT, ACT or something else • ALB is working on initiatives to increase SAT participation and scores. • 61 0f 115 school districts had higher 2010 CR + M scores, but only 29 of those have comparable demographics.

More Related