1 / 31

EHS Compliance Educational Seminar for TBR Colleges and Universities

EHS Compliance Educational Seminar for TBR Colleges and Universities. April 16, 2009 Nashville, Tennessee Presented by UT CIS. EHS Jeopardy…. Answer: Fines, penalties and jail time. Question : ?????. Did you know….

lefty
Download Presentation

EHS Compliance Educational Seminar for TBR Colleges and Universities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EHS Compliance Educational SeminarforTBR Colleges and Universities April 16, 2009 Nashville, Tennessee Presented by UT CIS

  2. EHS Jeopardy… • Answer: Fines, penalties and jail time. • Question: ?????

  3. Did you know… • EPA is holding educational institutions to the same standards as industry • Subject to the same environmental laws/regulations and penalties for non-compliance • Colleges and Universities were a low inspection priority in the past…times are changing!

  4. Did you know… • EPA identified high rate of non-compliance with colleges and universities • Primary problem areas: • Hazardous Waste Management • Water Pollution (Clean Water Act and Storm Water Pollution Prevention) • Fines and Penalties issued have ranged from $20K to over $1M

  5. Fines and Penalties… • Administrative • Civil & Criminal • Fines/penalties are additive to the cost of coming into compliance • Assessed per violation -- each day of non-compliance is separate violation • Other adverse consequences • Public relations, loss of government grants, contracts, permits, etc.

  6. Who’s Liable? • Corporation/College/University or Other Institution • Executives/Administrators/Managers • EHS coordinator • Other individuals • All of the above

  7. Who’s Liable? • Answer: All of the Above • “Natural” persons (Individuals) and “Juridical” persons (corporations, governmental entities and other institutions) can be held liable for violations.

  8. Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine • Corporate officers can be held criminally liable for acts committed by their subordinates • Prosecutions allowed when statute involves public health and welfare

  9. Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine • More aggressively used in environmental arena • Courts have held that environmental statutes are public health and welfare statues. • Can be used when public health/safety at stake • Proof of knowledge required under public welfare legislation is minimal – only have to show that a corporate officer “had, by reason of his position, responsibility and authority either to prevent… or promptly to correct the violation…and failed to do so...”

  10. Enforcement Actions • Enforcement actions on the rise – even with limited government resources. • Increase in criminal enforcements for environmental fractions: • More charges against individuals versus corporations. • Increasingly for failure to properly comply with procedural aspects of environmental laws.

  11. EPA Enforcement Actions • Criminal Prosecutions • Huntsman Chemical Company • Environmental Manager and Plant Manager indicted: fraudulent claims – air emissions • Koch Petroleum Group • V.P., Refinery Manager, Corporate Counsel, Plant Manager and Environmental Engineer indicted: conspiracy to conceal non-compliance

  12. EPA Enforcement Actions • Criminal Prosecutions • Intertek Testing Services Environmental Labs • 13 employees indicted – from V.P. all the way down to laboratory employees • Fraudulent claims – sample analysis

  13. EPA Enforcement Actions • Fines and Penalties • University of Hawaii • Paid $1.8 million in civil penalties for violating federal law – poorly managing lab waste • University of New Hampshire • Will pay a fine of $49,000 for RCRA violations and will spend at least $147,000 on a Supplemental Environmental Project

  14. EPA Enforcement Actions • Fines and Penalties • Yale University • $69,000 for RCRA violations • $279,000 committed to campus environmental projects • University of Georgia • $2.62 million cleanup of a hazardous waste landfill that had polluted ground water

  15. OSHA Enforcement Actions • Fines and Penalties • Imperial Sugar - $8,777,500 (initial) • 13 killed and 40 injured in explosion • BP Oil Company - $21,361,500 (final) • 15 killed, 107 injured - Texas Plant explosion • Safway Services Inc. - fines totaling $166,500 • Construction site fatality – 3 willful citations issued by TOSHA

  16. OSHA Enforcement Actions • Criminal Prosecutions • Lemaster Steel Erectors - Employee fell to death. Safety Director and Regional Manager plead guilty to violating federal fall protection regulations – sentenced to 6 months in prison and 3 years probation, plus fines. Site foreman sentenced to 4 months in prison and 3 years probation, plus fines. • Owner of plumbing firm pled guilty to criminal charges of willfully violating OSHA trenching safety standards – two employees killed – 6 months in jail and 3 years probation, plus restitution to victims’ families.

  17. How do you minimize the potential for fines and penalties? • Implementing an effective EHS compliance program is the best defense. • Program should evaluate the daily functions, identify problem areas and actively work to rectify problems. • Functional program and top to bottom involvement is essential for any organization operating in a regulated industry.

  18. Define campus areas with EHS aspects and impacts: Laboratories Art Departments Physical Plants/boiler rooms & emergency generators Chemical storage rooms/storage tanks Maintenance Facilities/paint booths New Construction Automotive Fleets Compliance Program Action Items

  19. Program Action Items…. • Determine aspects/impacts in each area: • Chemical use/storage/exposure • Waste generation & disposal • Wastewater discharges • Refrigerant issues • Asbestos, lead paint, air emissions • Equipment/machinery use • Noise

  20. Program Action Items…. • Evaluate compliance with each aspect/impact identified. • Identify compliance gaps and required steps to close the gaps.

  21. Sample FormDocumenting Aspects, Gaps & Action Items

  22. Program Action Items…. • Once identified, work diligently to close compliance gaps. • Must make progress and get things done!

  23. Getting things done… • Administrative involvement is crucial • Must allocate resources – including $$$ • Compliance is a cost center – not a profit center. • However, consider the cost of non-compliance: fines, penalties and the risk of criminal prosecution, including jail time.

  24. Getting things done… • Share the wealth • EHS coordinator can’t do it alone • Form a team -- at least one person from areas with safety/environmental aspects/impacts and other key areas/functions • Define team roles, responsibilities, goals and objectives • Provide team with information, training and follow-up

  25. Getting things done… • Create compliance roadmap • Checklist and mock audits can be used to get started -- great tools for compliance gap analysis • Benchmark with a campus that has an established program • Develop and document standard operating procedures for compliance issues • Have a good recordkeeping system

  26. Getting things done… • Prioritize • Decide on what must get done • Use a “rating system” to rank items on the “to do” list • Consider compliance, risk, financial, etc. • Document list • Forward to team members • Include timeline and responsibilities

  27. How to prioritize…. • Eliminate the hazard • Address non-compliance • Fix the easy first, then target big ticket items • Be purposeful and plan ahead • Proactive versus reactive

  28. Sample RANKING Worksheet (Typically used for EMS Systems) Assign Value 0 to 5 5 = High 1 = Low 0 = Not applicable

  29. What’s Next…. • Continue with compliance programs • Administration support is vital • Additional Training • Next topic: Hazardous Waste notification/reporting - preparing and submitting the appropriate forms • Other topics to come • Needs/suggestions – contact EH&S Regional Executives

  30. Questions?

More Related