1 / 15

Developing EULAR recommendations

Developing EULAR recommendations. EULAR Standing Committee of Clinical Affairs Dr. Daniel Aletaha Prof. Désirée van der Heijde. Typical methods for developing EULAR recommendations. Task force members Convenor Methodologist Fellow Group of experts. Establishing a task force.

lefty
Download Presentation

Developing EULAR recommendations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing EULAR recommendations EULAR Standing Committee of Clinical Affairs Dr. Daniel Aletaha Prof. Désirée van der Heijde

  2. Typical methods for developing EULAR recommendations • Task force members • Convenor • Methodologist • Fellow • Group ofexperts Establishing a task force First task force meeting Evidencephase Consensus phase Final product

  3. Typical methods for seveloping EULAR recommendations Establishing a task force Two principalmethodological options 1. Data analysis 2. Literaturesearch First task force meeting Evidencephase Consensus phase Final product

  4. EULAR terminologyfor committee projects Criteria documents

  5. EULAR terminologyfor committee projects • (Guidelines) • Recommendations • Points to consider Criteria documents Guidance documents

  6. EULAR terminologyfor committee projects • Classification / diagnosticcriteria • Outcomescriteria (e.g. remissioncriteria, diseaseactivitytools etc.) • Management recommendations (diagnosticandtherapeutic) • Recommendations for conducting scientific research (e.g. reporting clinical trials) Criteria documents Guidance documents

  7. Process of Application Applicant Full proposal

  8. Process of Application Applicant • Main criteria for proposal: • Convenor from a EULAR country • Multinationality • Patient involvement • Relevance to EULAR objectives • Adequate budget (€55,000 or €35,000 updates) Full proposal Review/evaluation by standing committee chairmen

  9. Process of Application Applicant Funding decision executive committee(March/September) Full proposal Recommendation to executive committee by committee chair Funding evaluation by committee chair Changesrequested Review/evaluation by standing committee chairmen

  10. EULAR SOP‘s forRecommendation Projects Dougados M et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2004.

  11. The role of patients in EULAR projects Patients should be involved in all phases of the project All project applications must have a separate lay summary At least two patients have to be involved in the active process

  12. The role of patients in EULAR projects de Wit M et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2010.

More Related