1 / 37

IceCube Neutrino Telescope and the GZK n detection

TAUP2003. IceCube Neutrino Telescope and the GZK n detection. Shigeru Yoshida, Chiba University. The IceCube Collaboration. Institutions: 11 US, 9 European institutions and 1 Japanese institution ; ≈150 people Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware, USA BUGH Wuppertal, Germany

leann
Download Presentation

IceCube Neutrino Telescope and the GZK n detection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TAUP2003 IceCube Neutrino Telescope and the GZK n detection Shigeru Yoshida, Chiba University

  2. The IceCube Collaboration Institutions: 11 US, 9 European institutions and1 Japanese institution; ≈150 people • Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware, USA • BUGH Wuppertal, Germany • Dept. of Physics, Chiba University, JAPAN • Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium • CTSPS, Clark-Atlanta University, Atlanta USA • DESY-Zeuthen, Zeuthen, Germany • Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, USA • Dept. of Technology, Kalmar University, Kalmar, Sweden • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA • Department of Physics, Southern University and A\&M College, Baton Rouge, LA, USA • Dept. of Physics, UC Berkeley, USA • Institute of Physics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany • Department of Physics, University of Maryland, USA • University of Mons-Hainaut, Mons, Belgium • Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA • Dept. of Astronomy, Dept. of Physics, SSEC, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA • Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, River Falls, USA • Division of High Energy Physics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden • Fysikum, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden • University of Alabama, USA • Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium

  3. South Pole Dark sector Skiway AMANDA Dome IceCube

  4. IceTop AMANDA South Pole Skiway 1400 m 2400 m IceCube • 80 Strings • 4800 PMT • Instrumented volume: 1 km3 (1 Gt) • IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of all flavors at energies from 107 eV (SN) to 1020 eV

  5. Design parameters: Time resolution:≤ 5 nsec (system level) Dynamic range: 200 photoelectrons/15 nsec (Integrated dynamic range: > 2000 photoelectrons) (1.p.e. /10ns ~ 160mA 10^7G ~8mV 50 W) 4V saturation500p.e. Digitization depth: 4 µsec. Noise rate in situ: ≤500 Hz Tube trig.rate by muons 20Hz DAQ design: Digital Optical Module- PMT pulses are digitized in the Ice DOM 33 cm

  6. ATWD 300MHz 14 bits. 3 different gains (x15 x3 x0.5) Capture inter. 426nsec 10 bits FADC for long duration pulse. Capture Waveform information (MC) E=10 PeV String 5 String 4 String 3 String 1 String 2 Events / 10 nsec 0 - 4 µsec

  7. Selection criteria (@ -40 °C) Noise < 300 Hz (SN, bandwidth) Gain > 5E7 at 2kV (nom. 1E7 + margin) P/V > 2.0 (Charge res.; in-situ gain calibration) Notes: Only Hamamatsu PMT meets excellent low noise rates! Tested three flavors of R7081. Photomultiplier:HamamatsuR7081-02 (10”, 10-stage, 1E+08 gain)

  8. N

  9. Digital Optical Module (DOM) Main Board Test Card

  10. SPE Discriminator Scan – PMT Pulses Input (71DB)

  11. The big reel for the hotwater drill

  12. Energy Spectrum Diffuse Search Blue: after downgoing muon rejection Red: after cut on Nhit to get ultimate sensitivity

  13. Effective area of IceCube Aeff / km2 cos  Effective area vs. zenith angle after rejection of background from downgoing atmospheric muons • Effective area vs. muon energy • - after trigger • - after rejection of atm  • after cuts to get the ultimate • sensitivity for point sources • (optimized for 2 benchmark spectra)

  14. TAUP 2003 In three years operation… • E2dNn/dE ~10-8 GeV/cm2 s sr (diffuse) • E2dNn/dE ~7x10-9 GeV/cm2 s (Point source) • 200 bursts in coincidence (GRBs – WB flux) For 5s detection

  15. Construction: 11/2004-01/2009 Grid North 100 m AMANDA South Pole SPASE-2 Dome Skiway Next season: Buildup of the Drill and IceTop prototypes

  16. TAUP 2003 Project status • Approved by U.S. the National Science Board • Startup funding is allocated. 100 DOMs are produced and being tested this year. • Assembling of the drill/IceTop prototypes is carried out at the pole this season. • Full Construction start in 04/05; takes 6 years to complete. • Then 16 strings per season, increased rate may be possible.

  17. TAUP 2003 GZK EHEn detection • What is the GZK mechanism? • EHE n/m/t Propagation in the Earth • Expected intensities at the IceCube depth • Atmospheric m – background • Event rate

  18. UHE (EeV or even higher) Neutrino Events Arriving Extremely Horizontally • Needs Detailed Estimation • Limited Solid Angle Window (srNA)-1 ~ 600 (s/10-32cm2) -1(r/2.6g cm-3) -1 [km] Involving the interactions generating electromagnetic/hadron cascades mN mX e+e- TAUP 2003

  19. Products ne nm nt m t p e/g ne Weak Weak nm Weak Weak nt Weak Weak Incoming e/g Cascades Decay Weak Pair/decay Bremss Decay m Pair Pair PhotoNucl. DecayPair Decay Pair Bremss Decay Decay Weak t Pair PhotoNucl. p Cascades

  20. TAUP 2003

  21. ± π + e - e 1.4km 1km Ice γ ν lepton 1km Rock ν Upward ν

  22. Muon(Neutrinos) from nm nt Nadir Angle TAUP 2003

  23. Suppression By t decay Tau(Neutrinos) from nm nt TAUP 2003

  24. GZK Neutrino Production 0.6 x 10-27 cm2 2.725 K 411 photons / cm3 π ν + + γ μ + ν e p γ p n E = 10 20 eV Conventional Mechanism of EHE neutrinos!! E 0.8 x 10 20 eV ~

  25. Yoshida and Teshima 1993 Yoshida, Dai, Jui, Sommers 1997 TAUP 2003

  26. Upward-going TAUP 2003

  27. Downward going!! TAUP 2003

  28. ν Downward lepton γ γ ± π + + e e - - e e 1.4km 1km Ice γ ν lepton 1km Rock ν Upward

  29. 11000m 2800 m 1400 m Down-going events dominates… Up Down TAUP 2003

  30. Intensity of EHE m and t [cm-2 sec-1] TAUP 2003

  31. Atmospheric Muons! • Major Backgrounds but so steap spectrum!

  32. Atmospheric m is strongly attenuated… Up Down TAUP 2003

  33. Flux as a function of energy deposit in km3 • dE/dX~bE DE~DXbE

  34. Atmospheric m is strongly attenuated… Up Down TAUP 2003

  35. Intensity of EHE m and t [cm-2 sec-1] TAUP 2003

  36. How EHE events look like Eµ=10 TeV ≈ 90 hits Eµ=6 PeV ≈ 1000 hits The typical light cylinder generated by a muon of 100 GeV is 20 m, 1PeV 400 m, 1EeV it is about 600 to 700 m.

  37. t/mappeared in 10 PeV- EeV are our prime target on GZK n detection. 1/100-1/500 of primary n intensity! Downwardt and m make main contributions in PeV -EeV Energy Estimation would be a key for the bg reduction Because atmospheric m spectrum ~ E3.7 TAUP 2003 Summary GZK n is DETECTABLE by IceCube 0.2-40 events/year (BG 0.05 events/year)

More Related